Cargando…

Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is influenced by myriad individual, societal and environmental factors that are not typically reflected in current interventions. Socio-ecological conditions evolve and require ongoing monitoring in terms of assessing their influence on child health. The aim of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Donnell, Shane, Doyle, Gerardine, O’Malley, Grace, Browne, Sarah, O’Connor, James, Mars, Monica, Kechadi, M-Tahar M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09814-y
_version_ 1783610789653905408
author O’Donnell, Shane
Doyle, Gerardine
O’Malley, Grace
Browne, Sarah
O’Connor, James
Mars, Monica
Kechadi, M-Tahar M.
author_facet O’Donnell, Shane
Doyle, Gerardine
O’Malley, Grace
Browne, Sarah
O’Connor, James
Mars, Monica
Kechadi, M-Tahar M.
author_sort O’Donnell, Shane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is influenced by myriad individual, societal and environmental factors that are not typically reflected in current interventions. Socio-ecological conditions evolve and require ongoing monitoring in terms of assessing their influence on child health. The aim of this study was to identify and prioritise indicators deemed relevant by public health authorities for monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions. METHOD: A three-round Delphi Panel composed of experts from regions across Europe, with a remit in childhood obesity intervention, were asked to identify indicators that were a priority in their efforts to address childhood obesity in their respective jurisdictions. In Round 1, 16 panellists answered a series of open-ended questions to identify the most relevant indicators concerning the evaluation and subsequent monitoring of interventions addressing childhood obesity, focusing on three main domains: built environments, dietary environments, and health inequalities. In Rounds 2 and 3, panellists rated the importance of each of the identified indicators within these domains, and the responses were then analysed quantitatively. RESULTS: Twenty-seven expert panellists were invited to participate in the study. Of these, 16/27 completed round 1 (5 9% response rate), 14/16 completed round 2 (87.5% response rate), and 8/14 completed the third and final round (57% response rate). Consensus (defined as > 70% agreement) was reached on a total of 45 of the 87 indicators (49%) across three primary domains (built and dietary environments and health inequalities), with 100% consensus reached for 5 of these indicators (6%). CONCLUSION: Forty-five potential indicators were identified, pertaining primarily to the dietary environment, built environment and health inequalities. These results have important implications more widely for evaluating interventions aimed at childhood obesity reduction and prevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7670696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76706962020-11-18 Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study O’Donnell, Shane Doyle, Gerardine O’Malley, Grace Browne, Sarah O’Connor, James Mars, Monica Kechadi, M-Tahar M. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is influenced by myriad individual, societal and environmental factors that are not typically reflected in current interventions. Socio-ecological conditions evolve and require ongoing monitoring in terms of assessing their influence on child health. The aim of this study was to identify and prioritise indicators deemed relevant by public health authorities for monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions. METHOD: A three-round Delphi Panel composed of experts from regions across Europe, with a remit in childhood obesity intervention, were asked to identify indicators that were a priority in their efforts to address childhood obesity in their respective jurisdictions. In Round 1, 16 panellists answered a series of open-ended questions to identify the most relevant indicators concerning the evaluation and subsequent monitoring of interventions addressing childhood obesity, focusing on three main domains: built environments, dietary environments, and health inequalities. In Rounds 2 and 3, panellists rated the importance of each of the identified indicators within these domains, and the responses were then analysed quantitatively. RESULTS: Twenty-seven expert panellists were invited to participate in the study. Of these, 16/27 completed round 1 (5 9% response rate), 14/16 completed round 2 (87.5% response rate), and 8/14 completed the third and final round (57% response rate). Consensus (defined as > 70% agreement) was reached on a total of 45 of the 87 indicators (49%) across three primary domains (built and dietary environments and health inequalities), with 100% consensus reached for 5 of these indicators (6%). CONCLUSION: Forty-five potential indicators were identified, pertaining primarily to the dietary environment, built environment and health inequalities. These results have important implications more widely for evaluating interventions aimed at childhood obesity reduction and prevention. BioMed Central 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7670696/ /pubmed/33203390 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09814-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
O’Donnell, Shane
Doyle, Gerardine
O’Malley, Grace
Browne, Sarah
O’Connor, James
Mars, Monica
Kechadi, M-Tahar M.
Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
title Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
title_full Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
title_fullStr Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
title_full_unstemmed Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
title_short Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study
title_sort establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a delphi panel study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203390
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09814-y
work_keys_str_mv AT odonnellshane establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy
AT doylegerardine establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy
AT omalleygrace establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy
AT brownesarah establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy
AT oconnorjames establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy
AT marsmonica establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy
AT kechadimtaharm establishingconsensusonkeypublichealthindicatorsforthemonitoringandevaluatingchildhoodobesityinterventionsadelphipanelstudy