Cargando…

Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)

Privacy and confidentiality are core considerations in education, while at the same time, using and sharing data—and, more broadly, open science—is increasingly valued by editors, funding agencies, and the public. This manuscript responds to an empirical investigation of students’ perceptions of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenberg, Joshua M., Staudt Willet, K. Bret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09860-8
_version_ 1783610843857944576
author Rosenberg, Joshua M.
Staudt Willet, K. Bret
author_facet Rosenberg, Joshua M.
Staudt Willet, K. Bret
author_sort Rosenberg, Joshua M.
collection PubMed
description Privacy and confidentiality are core considerations in education, while at the same time, using and sharing data—and, more broadly, open science—is increasingly valued by editors, funding agencies, and the public. This manuscript responds to an empirical investigation of students’ perceptions of the use of their data in learning analytics systems by Ifentahler and Schumacher (Educational Technology Research and Development, 64: 923-938, 2016). We summarize their work in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shift to digital modes of teaching and learning by many teachers, using the tension between privacy and open science to frame our response. We offer informed recommendations for educational technology researchers in light of Ifentahler and Schumacher’s findings as well as strategies for navigating the tension between these important values. We conclude with a call for educational technology scholars to meet the challenge of studying learning (and disruptions to learning) in light of COVID-19 while protecting the privacy of students in ways that go beyond what Institutional Review Boards consider to be within their purview.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7670971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76709712020-11-18 Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016) Rosenberg, Joshua M. Staudt Willet, K. Bret Educ Technol Res Dev Article Privacy and confidentiality are core considerations in education, while at the same time, using and sharing data—and, more broadly, open science—is increasingly valued by editors, funding agencies, and the public. This manuscript responds to an empirical investigation of students’ perceptions of the use of their data in learning analytics systems by Ifentahler and Schumacher (Educational Technology Research and Development, 64: 923-938, 2016). We summarize their work in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shift to digital modes of teaching and learning by many teachers, using the tension between privacy and open science to frame our response. We offer informed recommendations for educational technology researchers in light of Ifentahler and Schumacher’s findings as well as strategies for navigating the tension between these important values. We conclude with a call for educational technology scholars to meet the challenge of studying learning (and disruptions to learning) in light of COVID-19 while protecting the privacy of students in ways that go beyond what Institutional Review Boards consider to be within their purview. Springer US 2020-11-17 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7670971/ /pubmed/33223778 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09860-8 Text en © Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Rosenberg, Joshua M.
Staudt Willet, K. Bret
Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)
title Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)
title_full Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)
title_fullStr Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)
title_full_unstemmed Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)
title_short Balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of COVID-19: a response to Ifenthaler & Schumacher (2016)
title_sort balancing’ privacy and open science in the context of covid-19: a response to ifenthaler & schumacher (2016)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33223778
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09860-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenbergjoshuam balancingprivacyandopenscienceinthecontextofcovid19aresponsetoifenthalerschumacher2016
AT staudtwilletkbret balancingprivacyandopenscienceinthecontextofcovid19aresponsetoifenthalerschumacher2016