Cargando…

Dietary Partitioning in Two Co-occurring Caecilian Species (Geotrypetes seraphini and Herpele squalostoma) in Central Africa

Trophic interactions among fossorial vertebrates remain poorly explored in tropical ecosystems. While caecilian species can co-occur, whether and how sympatric species partition dietary or other resources are largely unknown. Based on specimens collected during field surveys in southern Cameroon, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kouete, M T, Blackburn, D C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33791585
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iob/obz035
Descripción
Sumario:Trophic interactions among fossorial vertebrates remain poorly explored in tropical ecosystems. While caecilian species can co-occur, whether and how sympatric species partition dietary or other resources are largely unknown. Based on specimens collected during field surveys in southern Cameroon, we conducted a dietary analysis of two co-occurring caecilian species, Geotrypetes seraphini and Herpele squalostoma. We find a negligible overlap in the adult diets of these two species. Earthworms dominated the diet of adult G. seraphini, whereas we found that mole crickets were the most frequent prey items in adult H. squalostoma. The dietary breadth of adult G. seraphini is smaller than that of H. squalostoma, which consumes a variety of hard-bodied prey including mole crickets, cockroaches, beetles, and crabs. Juvenile diets were similar between these species and mostly contained earthworms and ants. We did not detect significant ontogenetic dietary shifts in either species, though adults generally consumed a broader diversity of prey. As adults, G. seraphini and H. squalostoma may partition prey categories by consuming soft-bodied and hard-bodied prey, respectively. Because most caecilians are likely opportunistic predators, we expect that sympatric species partition dietary resources either by preference for different soil layers or ability to consume different prey categories.