Cargando…

Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task

In psycholinguistics and clinical linguistics, the Sentence Repetition Task (SRT) is known to be a valuable tool to screen general language abilities in both spoken and signed languages. This task enables users to reliably and quickly assess linguistic abilities at different levels of linguistic ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bogliotti, Caroline, Aksen, Hatice, Isel, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236729
_version_ 1783610951342227456
author Bogliotti, Caroline
Aksen, Hatice
Isel, Frédéric
author_facet Bogliotti, Caroline
Aksen, Hatice
Isel, Frédéric
author_sort Bogliotti, Caroline
collection PubMed
description In psycholinguistics and clinical linguistics, the Sentence Repetition Task (SRT) is known to be a valuable tool to screen general language abilities in both spoken and signed languages. This task enables users to reliably and quickly assess linguistic abilities at different levels of linguistic analysis such as phonology, morphology, lexicon, and syntax. To evaluate sign language proficiency in deaf children using French Sign Language (LSF), we designed a new SRT comprising 20 LSF sentences. The task was administered to a cohort of 62 children– 34 native signers (6;09–12 years) and 28 non-native signers (6;08–12;08 years)–in order to study their general linguistic development as a function of age of sign language acquisition (AOA) and chronological age (CA). Previously, a group of 10 adult native signers was also evaluated with this task. As expected, our results showed a significant effect of AOA, indicating that the native signers repeated more signs and were more accurate than non-native signers. A similar pattern of results was found for CA. Furthermore, native signers made fewer phonological errors (i.e., handshape, movement, and location) than non-native signers. Finally, as shown in previous sign language studies, handshape and movement proved to be the most difficult parameters to master regardless of AOA and CA. Taken together, our findings support the assumption that AOA is a crucial factor in the development of phonological skills regardless of language modality (spoken vs. signed). This study thus constitutes a first step toward a theoretical description of the developmental trajectory in LSF, a hitherto understudied language.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7671551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76715512020-11-19 Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task Bogliotti, Caroline Aksen, Hatice Isel, Frédéric PLoS One Research Article In psycholinguistics and clinical linguistics, the Sentence Repetition Task (SRT) is known to be a valuable tool to screen general language abilities in both spoken and signed languages. This task enables users to reliably and quickly assess linguistic abilities at different levels of linguistic analysis such as phonology, morphology, lexicon, and syntax. To evaluate sign language proficiency in deaf children using French Sign Language (LSF), we designed a new SRT comprising 20 LSF sentences. The task was administered to a cohort of 62 children– 34 native signers (6;09–12 years) and 28 non-native signers (6;08–12;08 years)–in order to study their general linguistic development as a function of age of sign language acquisition (AOA) and chronological age (CA). Previously, a group of 10 adult native signers was also evaluated with this task. As expected, our results showed a significant effect of AOA, indicating that the native signers repeated more signs and were more accurate than non-native signers. A similar pattern of results was found for CA. Furthermore, native signers made fewer phonological errors (i.e., handshape, movement, and location) than non-native signers. Finally, as shown in previous sign language studies, handshape and movement proved to be the most difficult parameters to master regardless of AOA and CA. Taken together, our findings support the assumption that AOA is a crucial factor in the development of phonological skills regardless of language modality (spoken vs. signed). This study thus constitutes a first step toward a theoretical description of the developmental trajectory in LSF, a hitherto understudied language. Public Library of Science 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7671551/ /pubmed/33201887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236729 Text en © 2020 Bogliotti et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bogliotti, Caroline
Aksen, Hatice
Isel, Frédéric
Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
title Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
title_full Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
title_fullStr Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
title_full_unstemmed Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
title_short Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
title_sort language experience in lsf development: behavioral evidence from a sentence repetition task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201887
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236729
work_keys_str_mv AT bogliotticaroline languageexperienceinlsfdevelopmentbehavioralevidencefromasentencerepetitiontask
AT aksenhatice languageexperienceinlsfdevelopmentbehavioralevidencefromasentencerepetitiontask
AT iselfrederic languageexperienceinlsfdevelopmentbehavioralevidencefromasentencerepetitiontask