Cargando…
Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail
BACKGROUND: The scoring rubric on the USMLE Step 1 examination will be changing to pass/fail in January 2022. This study elicits internal medicine resident perspectives on USMLE pass/fail scoring at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To assess internal medicine resident opinions regarding USMLE pass/fai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1796366 |
_version_ | 1783610982372737024 |
---|---|
author | Wallach, Sara L. Williams, Christopher Chow, Robert T. Jadhav, Nagesh Kuehl, Sapna Raj, Jaya M. Alweis, Richard |
author_facet | Wallach, Sara L. Williams, Christopher Chow, Robert T. Jadhav, Nagesh Kuehl, Sapna Raj, Jaya M. Alweis, Richard |
author_sort | Wallach, Sara L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The scoring rubric on the USMLE Step 1 examination will be changing to pass/fail in January 2022. This study elicits internal medicine resident perspectives on USMLE pass/fail scoring at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To assess internal medicine resident opinions regarding USMLE pass/fail scoring and examine how variables such as gender, scores on USMLE 1 and 2, PGY status and type of medical school are associated with these results. METHODS: In the fall of 2019, the authors surveyed current internal medicine residents via an on-line tool distributed through their program directors. Respondents indicated their Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores from five categorical ranges. Questions on medical school type, year of training year, and gender were included. The results were analyzed utilizing Pearson Chi-square testing and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 4012 residents responded, reflecting 13% of internal medicine residents currently training in the USA. Fifty-five percent of respondents disagreed/strongly disagreed with pass/fail scoring and 34% agreed/strongly agreed. Group-based differences were significant for gender, PGY level, Step 1 score, and medical school type; a higher percentage of males, those training at the PGY1 level, and graduates of international medical schools (IMGs) disagreed with pass/fail reporting. In addition, high scorers on Step 1 were more likely to disagree with pass/fail reporting than low scoring residents CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a majority of internal medicine residents, currently training in the USA prefer that USMLE numerical scoring is retained and not changed to pass/fail. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7671726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76717262020-11-23 Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail Wallach, Sara L. Williams, Christopher Chow, Robert T. Jadhav, Nagesh Kuehl, Sapna Raj, Jaya M. Alweis, Richard J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Brief Report BACKGROUND: The scoring rubric on the USMLE Step 1 examination will be changing to pass/fail in January 2022. This study elicits internal medicine resident perspectives on USMLE pass/fail scoring at the national level. OBJECTIVE: To assess internal medicine resident opinions regarding USMLE pass/fail scoring and examine how variables such as gender, scores on USMLE 1 and 2, PGY status and type of medical school are associated with these results. METHODS: In the fall of 2019, the authors surveyed current internal medicine residents via an on-line tool distributed through their program directors. Respondents indicated their Step 1 and Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores from five categorical ranges. Questions on medical school type, year of training year, and gender were included. The results were analyzed utilizing Pearson Chi-square testing and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 4012 residents responded, reflecting 13% of internal medicine residents currently training in the USA. Fifty-five percent of respondents disagreed/strongly disagreed with pass/fail scoring and 34% agreed/strongly agreed. Group-based differences were significant for gender, PGY level, Step 1 score, and medical school type; a higher percentage of males, those training at the PGY1 level, and graduates of international medical schools (IMGs) disagreed with pass/fail reporting. In addition, high scorers on Step 1 were more likely to disagree with pass/fail reporting than low scoring residents CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a majority of internal medicine residents, currently training in the USA prefer that USMLE numerical scoring is retained and not changed to pass/fail. Taylor & Francis 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7671726/ /pubmed/33235666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1796366 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Greater Baltimore Medical Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Wallach, Sara L. Williams, Christopher Chow, Robert T. Jadhav, Nagesh Kuehl, Sapna Raj, Jaya M. Alweis, Richard Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail |
title | Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail |
title_full | Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail |
title_fullStr | Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail |
title_full_unstemmed | Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail |
title_short | Internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring USMLE as pass/fail |
title_sort | internal medicine resident perspectives on scoring usmle as pass/fail |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235666 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1796366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallachsaral internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail AT williamschristopher internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail AT chowrobertt internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail AT jadhavnagesh internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail AT kuehlsapna internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail AT rajjayam internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail AT alweisrichard internalmedicineresidentperspectivesonscoringusmleaspassfail |