Cargando…
High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses
There is good evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for reducing chronic back and leg pain (CBLP). SENZA randomized controlled trial showed high-frequency (10 kHz) stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) is clinically superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Undertake cost-consequence...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000866 |
_version_ | 1783611003145027584 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Rod S. Bentley, Anthony Campbell, Bruce Murphy, Kieran |
author_facet | Taylor, Rod S. Bentley, Anthony Campbell, Bruce Murphy, Kieran |
author_sort | Taylor, Rod S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is good evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for reducing chronic back and leg pain (CBLP). SENZA randomized controlled trial showed high-frequency (10 kHz) stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) is clinically superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Undertake cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness analysis of 10 kHz-SCS compared with LF-SCS. METHODS: A probabilistic decision tree and Markov decision analytic model was used to synthesize data on CBLP outcomes and costs over a 15-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service perspective using data from the SENZA randomized controlled trial and other publications. Results are expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in 2016 Pounds Sterling. RESULTS: 10 kHz-SCS is cost-saving and cost-effective compared with LF-SCS, with mean cost-savings of £7170 (95% confidence interval: £6767-£7573) and £3552 (95% confidence interval: £3313-£3792) per patient compared with nonrechargeable and rechargeable LF-SCS devices, respectively. 10 kHz-SCS has a 95% likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY. Our findings were robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong economic case for choosing 10 kHz-SCS over LF-SCS for CBLP. Furthermore, 10 kHz-SCS has clinical advantages not captured in our analysis, including shorter, and more predictable procedure times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7671822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76718222020-11-23 High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses Taylor, Rod S. Bentley, Anthony Campbell, Bruce Murphy, Kieran Clin J Pain Original Articles There is good evidence that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective for reducing chronic back and leg pain (CBLP). SENZA randomized controlled trial showed high-frequency (10 kHz) stimulation (10 kHz-SCS) is clinically superior to traditional low-frequency SCS (LF-SCS). Undertake cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness analysis of 10 kHz-SCS compared with LF-SCS. METHODS: A probabilistic decision tree and Markov decision analytic model was used to synthesize data on CBLP outcomes and costs over a 15-year time horizon from a UK National Health Service perspective using data from the SENZA randomized controlled trial and other publications. Results are expressed as incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in 2016 Pounds Sterling. RESULTS: 10 kHz-SCS is cost-saving and cost-effective compared with LF-SCS, with mean cost-savings of £7170 (95% confidence interval: £6767-£7573) and £3552 (95% confidence interval: £3313-£3792) per patient compared with nonrechargeable and rechargeable LF-SCS devices, respectively. 10 kHz-SCS has a 95% likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY. Our findings were robust across a wide range of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong economic case for choosing 10 kHz-SCS over LF-SCS for CBLP. Furthermore, 10 kHz-SCS has clinical advantages not captured in our analysis, including shorter, and more predictable procedure times. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11 2020-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7671822/ /pubmed/32769414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000866 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Taylor, Rod S. Bentley, Anthony Campbell, Bruce Murphy, Kieran High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses |
title | High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses |
title_full | High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses |
title_fullStr | High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses |
title_short | High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Cost-consequence and Cost-effectiveness Analyses |
title_sort | high-frequency 10 khz spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain: cost-consequence and cost-effectiveness analyses |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32769414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000000866 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorrods highfrequency10khzspinalcordstimulationforchronicbackandlegpaincostconsequenceandcosteffectivenessanalyses AT bentleyanthony highfrequency10khzspinalcordstimulationforchronicbackandlegpaincostconsequenceandcosteffectivenessanalyses AT campbellbruce highfrequency10khzspinalcordstimulationforchronicbackandlegpaincostconsequenceandcosteffectivenessanalyses AT murphykieran highfrequency10khzspinalcordstimulationforchronicbackandlegpaincostconsequenceandcosteffectivenessanalyses |