Cargando…

Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality

PURPOSE: Mixed reality (MR) is being evaluated as a visual tool for surgical navigation. Current literature presents unclear results on intraoperative accuracy using the Microsoft HoloLens 1(®). This study aims to assess the impact of the surgeon’s sightline in an inside-out marker-based MR navigati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luzon, Javier A., Stimec, Bojan V., Bakka, Arne O., Edwin, Bjørn, Ignjatovic, Dejan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02263-3
_version_ 1783611032398200832
author Luzon, Javier A.
Stimec, Bojan V.
Bakka, Arne O.
Edwin, Bjørn
Ignjatovic, Dejan
author_facet Luzon, Javier A.
Stimec, Bojan V.
Bakka, Arne O.
Edwin, Bjørn
Ignjatovic, Dejan
author_sort Luzon, Javier A.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Mixed reality (MR) is being evaluated as a visual tool for surgical navigation. Current literature presents unclear results on intraoperative accuracy using the Microsoft HoloLens 1(®). This study aims to assess the impact of the surgeon’s sightline in an inside-out marker-based MR navigation system for open surgery. METHODS: Surgeons at Akershus University Hospital tested this system. A custom-made phantom was used, containing 18 wire target crosses within its inner walls. A CT scan was obtained in order to segment all wire targets into a single 3D-model (hologram). An in-house software application (CTrue), developed for the Microsoft HoloLens 1, uploaded 3D-models and automatically registered the 3D-model with the phantom. Based on the surgeon’s sightline while registering and targeting (free sightline /F/or a strictly perpendicular sightline /P/), 4 scenarios were developed (FF-PF-FP-PP). Target error distance (TED) was obtained in three different working axes-(XYZ). RESULTS: Six surgeons (5 males, age 29–62) were enrolled. A total of 864 measurements were collected in 4 scenarios, twice. Scenario PP showed the smallest TED in XYZ-axes mean = 2.98 mm ± SD 1.33; 2.28 mm ± SD 1.45; 2.78 mm ± SD 1.91, respectively. Scenario FF showed the largest TED in XYZ-axes with mean = 10.03 mm ± SD 3.19; 6.36 mm ± SD 3.36; 16.11 mm ± SD 8.91, respectively. Multiple comparison tests, grouped in scenarios and axes, showed that the majority of scenario comparisons had significantly different TED values (p < 0.05). Y-axis always presented the smallest TED regardless of scenario tested. CONCLUSION: A strictly perpendicular working sightline in relation to the 3D-model achieves the best accuracy results. Shortcomings in this technology, as an intraoperative visual cue, can be overcome by sightline correction. Incidentally, this is the preferred working angle for open surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7671978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76719782020-11-20 Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality Luzon, Javier A. Stimec, Bojan V. Bakka, Arne O. Edwin, Bjørn Ignjatovic, Dejan Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Mixed reality (MR) is being evaluated as a visual tool for surgical navigation. Current literature presents unclear results on intraoperative accuracy using the Microsoft HoloLens 1(®). This study aims to assess the impact of the surgeon’s sightline in an inside-out marker-based MR navigation system for open surgery. METHODS: Surgeons at Akershus University Hospital tested this system. A custom-made phantom was used, containing 18 wire target crosses within its inner walls. A CT scan was obtained in order to segment all wire targets into a single 3D-model (hologram). An in-house software application (CTrue), developed for the Microsoft HoloLens 1, uploaded 3D-models and automatically registered the 3D-model with the phantom. Based on the surgeon’s sightline while registering and targeting (free sightline /F/or a strictly perpendicular sightline /P/), 4 scenarios were developed (FF-PF-FP-PP). Target error distance (TED) was obtained in three different working axes-(XYZ). RESULTS: Six surgeons (5 males, age 29–62) were enrolled. A total of 864 measurements were collected in 4 scenarios, twice. Scenario PP showed the smallest TED in XYZ-axes mean = 2.98 mm ± SD 1.33; 2.28 mm ± SD 1.45; 2.78 mm ± SD 1.91, respectively. Scenario FF showed the largest TED in XYZ-axes with mean = 10.03 mm ± SD 3.19; 6.36 mm ± SD 3.36; 16.11 mm ± SD 8.91, respectively. Multiple comparison tests, grouped in scenarios and axes, showed that the majority of scenario comparisons had significantly different TED values (p < 0.05). Y-axis always presented the smallest TED regardless of scenario tested. CONCLUSION: A strictly perpendicular working sightline in relation to the 3D-model achieves the best accuracy results. Shortcomings in this technology, as an intraoperative visual cue, can be overcome by sightline correction. Incidentally, this is the preferred working angle for open surgery. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7671978/ /pubmed/32984934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02263-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Luzon, Javier A.
Stimec, Bojan V.
Bakka, Arne O.
Edwin, Bjørn
Ignjatovic, Dejan
Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
title Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
title_full Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
title_fullStr Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
title_full_unstemmed Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
title_short Value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
title_sort value of the surgeon’s sightline on hologram registration and targeting in mixed reality
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7671978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32984934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02263-3
work_keys_str_mv AT luzonjaviera valueofthesurgeonssightlineonhologramregistrationandtargetinginmixedreality
AT stimecbojanv valueofthesurgeonssightlineonhologramregistrationandtargetinginmixedreality
AT bakkaarneo valueofthesurgeonssightlineonhologramregistrationandtargetinginmixedreality
AT edwinbjørn valueofthesurgeonssightlineonhologramregistrationandtargetinginmixedreality
AT ignjatovicdejan valueofthesurgeonssightlineonhologramregistrationandtargetinginmixedreality