Cargando…
Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study
BACKGROUND: Haemoadsorption has been described as an effective way to control increased pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators (“cytokine storm”) in septic shock patients. No prospective or randomised clinical study has yet confirmed these results. However, no study has yet prospectively specifically...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00772-7 |
_version_ | 1783611074200731648 |
---|---|
author | Schittek, Gregor A. Zoidl, Philipp Eichinger, Michael Orlob, Simon Simonis, Holger Rief, Martin Metnitz, Philipp Fellinger, Tobias Soukup, Jens |
author_facet | Schittek, Gregor A. Zoidl, Philipp Eichinger, Michael Orlob, Simon Simonis, Holger Rief, Martin Metnitz, Philipp Fellinger, Tobias Soukup, Jens |
author_sort | Schittek, Gregor A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Haemoadsorption has been described as an effective way to control increased pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators (“cytokine storm”) in septic shock patients. No prospective or randomised clinical study has yet confirmed these results. However, no study has yet prospectively specifically investigated patients in severe septic shock with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). Therefore, we aimed to examine whether haemoadsorption could influence intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality in these patients. Furthermore, we examined the influence of haemoadsorption on length of stay in the ICU and therapeutic support. METHODS: Retrospective control group and prospective intervention group design in a tertiary hospital in central Europe (Germany). Intervention was the implementation of haemoadsorption for patients in septic shock with SA-AKI. 76 patients were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Severity of illness as depicted by APACHE II was higher in patients treated with haemoadsorption. Risk-adjusted ICU mortality rates (O/E ratios) did not differ significantly between the groups (0.80 vs. 0.83). We observed in patients treated with haemoadsorption a shorter LOS and shorter therapeutic support such as catecholamine dependency and duration of RRT. However, in multivariate analysis (logistic regression for mortality, competing risk for LOS), we found no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of haemoadsorption for patients in septic shock with acute renal failure did not lead to a reduction in ICU or hospital mortality rates. Despite univariate analysis delivering some evidence for a shorter duration of ICU-related treatments in the haemoadsorption group, these results did not remain significant in multivariate analysis. Trial registration CytoSorb(®) registry https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02312024. December 9, 2014. Database: https://www.cytosorb-registry.org/ (registration for content acquisition is necessary) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7672170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76721702020-11-18 Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study Schittek, Gregor A. Zoidl, Philipp Eichinger, Michael Orlob, Simon Simonis, Holger Rief, Martin Metnitz, Philipp Fellinger, Tobias Soukup, Jens Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Haemoadsorption has been described as an effective way to control increased pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators (“cytokine storm”) in septic shock patients. No prospective or randomised clinical study has yet confirmed these results. However, no study has yet prospectively specifically investigated patients in severe septic shock with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI). Therefore, we aimed to examine whether haemoadsorption could influence intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality in these patients. Furthermore, we examined the influence of haemoadsorption on length of stay in the ICU and therapeutic support. METHODS: Retrospective control group and prospective intervention group design in a tertiary hospital in central Europe (Germany). Intervention was the implementation of haemoadsorption for patients in septic shock with SA-AKI. 76 patients were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Severity of illness as depicted by APACHE II was higher in patients treated with haemoadsorption. Risk-adjusted ICU mortality rates (O/E ratios) did not differ significantly between the groups (0.80 vs. 0.83). We observed in patients treated with haemoadsorption a shorter LOS and shorter therapeutic support such as catecholamine dependency and duration of RRT. However, in multivariate analysis (logistic regression for mortality, competing risk for LOS), we found no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of haemoadsorption for patients in septic shock with acute renal failure did not lead to a reduction in ICU or hospital mortality rates. Despite univariate analysis delivering some evidence for a shorter duration of ICU-related treatments in the haemoadsorption group, these results did not remain significant in multivariate analysis. Trial registration CytoSorb(®) registry https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02312024. December 9, 2014. Database: https://www.cytosorb-registry.org/ (registration for content acquisition is necessary) Springer International Publishing 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7672170/ /pubmed/33206229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00772-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Schittek, Gregor A. Zoidl, Philipp Eichinger, Michael Orlob, Simon Simonis, Holger Rief, Martin Metnitz, Philipp Fellinger, Tobias Soukup, Jens Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
title | Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
title_full | Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
title_short | Adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
title_sort | adsorption therapy in critically ill with septic shock and acute kidney injury: a retrospective and prospective cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00772-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schittekgregora adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT zoidlphilipp adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT eichingermichael adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT orlobsimon adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT simonisholger adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT riefmartin adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT metnitzphilipp adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT fellingertobias adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy AT soukupjens adsorptiontherapyincriticallyillwithsepticshockandacutekidneyinjuryaretrospectiveandprospectivecohortstudy |