Cargando…

Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?

BACKGROUND: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moodley, Keymanthri, Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya, Soldaat, Leza, Kleinsmidt, Anita, Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel, Kling, Sharon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2
_version_ 1783611074903277568
author Moodley, Keymanthri
Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya
Soldaat, Leza
Kleinsmidt, Anita
Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel
Kling, Sharon
author_facet Moodley, Keymanthri
Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya
Soldaat, Leza
Kleinsmidt, Anita
Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel
Kling, Sharon
author_sort Moodley, Keymanthri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal CECs in Africa to raise awareness of and to encourage the establishment of CECs or Clinical Ethics Consultation Services (CESs) on the continent. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken using an online questionnaire via SunSurveys to survey healthcare professionals and bioethicists in Africa. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and Fischer's exact test was applied to determine associations. Texts from the open-ended questions were thematically analysed. RESULTS: In total 109 participants from 37 African countries completed the survey in December 2019. A significant association was found between participants’ bioethics qualification or training and involvement in clinical ethics (p = 0.005). All participants were familiar with Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and initially conflated RECs with CECs. When CECs were explained in detail, approximately 85.3% reported that they had no formal CECs in their institutions. The constraints to developing CECs included lack of training, limited resources, and lack of awareness of CECs. However, the majority of participants (81.7%) were interested in establishing CECs. Participants listed assistance required in establishing CECs including funding, resources, capacity building and collaboration with other known CECs. The results do not reflect CECs established since the onset of COVID-19 in Africa. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a first look into CECs in Africa and found very few formal CECs on the continent indicating an urgent need for the establishment of CECs or CESs in Africa. While the majority of healthcare professionals and bioethicists are aware of ethical dilemmas in healthcare, the concept of formal CECs is foreign. This study served to raise awareness of CECs. Research ethics and RECs overshadow CECs in Africa because international funders from the global north support capacity development in research ethics and establish RECs to approve the research they fund in Africa. Raising awareness via educational opportunities, research and conferences about CECs and their role in improving the quality of health care in Africa is sorely needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7672173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76721732020-11-18 Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? Moodley, Keymanthri Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya Soldaat, Leza Kleinsmidt, Anita Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Kling, Sharon BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal CECs in Africa to raise awareness of and to encourage the establishment of CECs or Clinical Ethics Consultation Services (CESs) on the continent. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken using an online questionnaire via SunSurveys to survey healthcare professionals and bioethicists in Africa. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and Fischer's exact test was applied to determine associations. Texts from the open-ended questions were thematically analysed. RESULTS: In total 109 participants from 37 African countries completed the survey in December 2019. A significant association was found between participants’ bioethics qualification or training and involvement in clinical ethics (p = 0.005). All participants were familiar with Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and initially conflated RECs with CECs. When CECs were explained in detail, approximately 85.3% reported that they had no formal CECs in their institutions. The constraints to developing CECs included lack of training, limited resources, and lack of awareness of CECs. However, the majority of participants (81.7%) were interested in establishing CECs. Participants listed assistance required in establishing CECs including funding, resources, capacity building and collaboration with other known CECs. The results do not reflect CECs established since the onset of COVID-19 in Africa. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a first look into CECs in Africa and found very few formal CECs on the continent indicating an urgent need for the establishment of CECs or CESs in Africa. While the majority of healthcare professionals and bioethicists are aware of ethical dilemmas in healthcare, the concept of formal CECs is foreign. This study served to raise awareness of CECs. Research ethics and RECs overshadow CECs in Africa because international funders from the global north support capacity development in research ethics and establish RECs to approve the research they fund in Africa. Raising awareness via educational opportunities, research and conferences about CECs and their role in improving the quality of health care in Africa is sorely needed. BioMed Central 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7672173/ /pubmed/33208150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moodley, Keymanthri
Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya
Soldaat, Leza
Kleinsmidt, Anita
Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel
Kling, Sharon
Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
title Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
title_full Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
title_fullStr Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
title_short Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
title_sort clinical ethics committees in africa: lost in the shadow of recs/irbs?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2
work_keys_str_mv AT moodleykeymanthri clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs
AT kabandasitimukaumbya clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs
AT soldaatleza clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs
AT kleinsmidtanita clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs
AT obasaadetayoemmanuel clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs
AT klingsharon clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs