Cargando…
Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs?
BACKGROUND: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2 |
_version_ | 1783611074903277568 |
---|---|
author | Moodley, Keymanthri Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya Soldaat, Leza Kleinsmidt, Anita Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Kling, Sharon |
author_facet | Moodley, Keymanthri Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya Soldaat, Leza Kleinsmidt, Anita Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Kling, Sharon |
author_sort | Moodley, Keymanthri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal CECs in Africa to raise awareness of and to encourage the establishment of CECs or Clinical Ethics Consultation Services (CESs) on the continent. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken using an online questionnaire via SunSurveys to survey healthcare professionals and bioethicists in Africa. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and Fischer's exact test was applied to determine associations. Texts from the open-ended questions were thematically analysed. RESULTS: In total 109 participants from 37 African countries completed the survey in December 2019. A significant association was found between participants’ bioethics qualification or training and involvement in clinical ethics (p = 0.005). All participants were familiar with Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and initially conflated RECs with CECs. When CECs were explained in detail, approximately 85.3% reported that they had no formal CECs in their institutions. The constraints to developing CECs included lack of training, limited resources, and lack of awareness of CECs. However, the majority of participants (81.7%) were interested in establishing CECs. Participants listed assistance required in establishing CECs including funding, resources, capacity building and collaboration with other known CECs. The results do not reflect CECs established since the onset of COVID-19 in Africa. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a first look into CECs in Africa and found very few formal CECs on the continent indicating an urgent need for the establishment of CECs or CESs in Africa. While the majority of healthcare professionals and bioethicists are aware of ethical dilemmas in healthcare, the concept of formal CECs is foreign. This study served to raise awareness of CECs. Research ethics and RECs overshadow CECs in Africa because international funders from the global north support capacity development in research ethics and establish RECs to approve the research they fund in Africa. Raising awareness via educational opportunities, research and conferences about CECs and their role in improving the quality of health care in Africa is sorely needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7672173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76721732020-11-18 Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? Moodley, Keymanthri Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya Soldaat, Leza Kleinsmidt, Anita Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Kling, Sharon BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical Ethics Committees (CECs) are well established at healthcare institutions in resource-rich countries. However, there is limited information on established CECs in resource poor countries, especially in Africa. This study aimed to establish baseline data regarding existing formal CECs in Africa to raise awareness of and to encourage the establishment of CECs or Clinical Ethics Consultation Services (CESs) on the continent. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken using an online questionnaire via SunSurveys to survey healthcare professionals and bioethicists in Africa. Data were subjected to descriptive analysis and Fischer's exact test was applied to determine associations. Texts from the open-ended questions were thematically analysed. RESULTS: In total 109 participants from 37 African countries completed the survey in December 2019. A significant association was found between participants’ bioethics qualification or training and involvement in clinical ethics (p = 0.005). All participants were familiar with Research Ethics Committees (RECs), and initially conflated RECs with CECs. When CECs were explained in detail, approximately 85.3% reported that they had no formal CECs in their institutions. The constraints to developing CECs included lack of training, limited resources, and lack of awareness of CECs. However, the majority of participants (81.7%) were interested in establishing CECs. Participants listed assistance required in establishing CECs including funding, resources, capacity building and collaboration with other known CECs. The results do not reflect CECs established since the onset of COVID-19 in Africa. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a first look into CECs in Africa and found very few formal CECs on the continent indicating an urgent need for the establishment of CECs or CESs in Africa. While the majority of healthcare professionals and bioethicists are aware of ethical dilemmas in healthcare, the concept of formal CECs is foreign. This study served to raise awareness of CECs. Research ethics and RECs overshadow CECs in Africa because international funders from the global north support capacity development in research ethics and establish RECs to approve the research they fund in Africa. Raising awareness via educational opportunities, research and conferences about CECs and their role in improving the quality of health care in Africa is sorely needed. BioMed Central 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7672173/ /pubmed/33208150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moodley, Keymanthri Kabanda, Siti Mukaumbya Soldaat, Leza Kleinsmidt, Anita Obasa, Adetayo Emmanuel Kling, Sharon Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? |
title | Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? |
title_full | Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? |
title_fullStr | Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? |
title_short | Clinical Ethics Committees in Africa: lost in the shadow of RECs/IRBs? |
title_sort | clinical ethics committees in africa: lost in the shadow of recs/irbs? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00559-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moodleykeymanthri clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs AT kabandasitimukaumbya clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs AT soldaatleza clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs AT kleinsmidtanita clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs AT obasaadetayoemmanuel clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs AT klingsharon clinicalethicscommitteesinafricalostintheshadowofrecsirbs |