Cargando…

Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers often serve as decision makers for dependent or vulnerable individuals facing health care decisions. Decision regret is one of the most prevalent outcomes reported by informal caregivers who have made such decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine levels of decision regret and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elidor, Hélène, Adekpedjou, Rhéda, Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon, Ben Charif, Ali, Agbadjé, Titilayo Tatiana, Rheault, Nathalie, Légaré, France
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20963038
_version_ 1783611202781315072
author Elidor, Hélène
Adekpedjou, Rhéda
Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
Ben Charif, Ali
Agbadjé, Titilayo Tatiana
Rheault, Nathalie
Légaré, France
author_facet Elidor, Hélène
Adekpedjou, Rhéda
Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
Ben Charif, Ali
Agbadjé, Titilayo Tatiana
Rheault, Nathalie
Légaré, France
author_sort Elidor, Hélène
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers often serve as decision makers for dependent or vulnerable individuals facing health care decisions. Decision regret is one of the most prevalent outcomes reported by informal caregivers who have made such decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine levels of decision regret and its predictors among informal caregivers who have made health-related decisions for a loved one. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 2018. Participants were informal caregivers, and the outcome was decision regret as measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We performed a narrative synthesis and presented predictors of decision regret using a conceptual framework, dividing the predictors into decision antecedents, decision-making process, and decision outcomes. RESULTS: We included 16 of 3003 studies identified. Most studies (n = 13) reported a mean DRS score ranging from 7.0 to 32.3 out of 100 (median = 14.3). The methodological quality of studies was acceptable. We organized predictors and their estimated effects (β) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as follows: decision antecedents (e.g., caregivers’ desire to avoid the decision, OR 2.07, 95% CI [1.04–4.12], P = 0.04), decision-making process (e.g., caregivers’ perception of effective decision making, β = 0.49 [0.05, 0.93], P < 0.01), and decision outcomes (e.g., incontinence, OR = 4.4 [1.1, 18.1], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that informal caregivers’ level of decision regret is generally low but is high for some decisions. We also identified predictors of regret during different stages of the decision-making process. These findings may guide future research on improving caregivers’ experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7672779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76727792020-12-03 Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review Elidor, Hélène Adekpedjou, Rhéda Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon Ben Charif, Ali Agbadjé, Titilayo Tatiana Rheault, Nathalie Légaré, France Med Decis Making Reviews BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers often serve as decision makers for dependent or vulnerable individuals facing health care decisions. Decision regret is one of the most prevalent outcomes reported by informal caregivers who have made such decisions. OBJECTIVE: To examine levels of decision regret and its predictors among informal caregivers who have made health-related decisions for a loved one. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic search of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to November 2018. Participants were informal caregivers, and the outcome was decision regret as measured using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). REVIEW METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We performed a narrative synthesis and presented predictors of decision regret using a conceptual framework, dividing the predictors into decision antecedents, decision-making process, and decision outcomes. RESULTS: We included 16 of 3003 studies identified. Most studies (n = 13) reported a mean DRS score ranging from 7.0 to 32.3 out of 100 (median = 14.3). The methodological quality of studies was acceptable. We organized predictors and their estimated effects (β) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as follows: decision antecedents (e.g., caregivers’ desire to avoid the decision, OR 2.07, 95% CI [1.04–4.12], P = 0.04), decision-making process (e.g., caregivers’ perception of effective decision making, β = 0.49 [0.05, 0.93], P < 0.01), and decision outcomes (e.g., incontinence, OR = 4.4 [1.1, 18.1], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that informal caregivers’ level of decision regret is generally low but is high for some decisions. We also identified predictors of regret during different stages of the decision-making process. These findings may guide future research on improving caregivers’ experiences. SAGE Publications 2020-10-22 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7672779/ /pubmed/33089748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20963038 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Reviews
Elidor, Hélène
Adekpedjou, Rhéda
Zomahoun, Hervé Tchala Vignon
Ben Charif, Ali
Agbadjé, Titilayo Tatiana
Rheault, Nathalie
Légaré, France
Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
title Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
title_full Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
title_short Extent and Predictors of Decision Regret among Informal Caregivers Making Decisions for a Loved One: A Systematic Review
title_sort extent and predictors of decision regret among informal caregivers making decisions for a loved one: a systematic review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33089748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20963038
work_keys_str_mv AT elidorhelene extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview
AT adekpedjourheda extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview
AT zomahounhervetchalavignon extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview
AT bencharifali extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview
AT agbadjetitilayotatiana extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview
AT rheaultnathalie extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview
AT legarefrance extentandpredictorsofdecisionregretamonginformalcaregiversmakingdecisionsforalovedoneasystematicreview