Cargando…

Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model

BACKGROUND: Up to 31% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) discontinue treatment with disease-modifying drug (DMD) within the first year, and of the patients who do continue, about 40% are nonadherent. Shared decision making may decrease nonadherence and discontinuation rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kremer, Ingrid E. H., Hiligsmann, Mickael, Carlson, Josh, Zimmermann, Marita, Jongen, Peter J., Evers, Silvia M. A. A., Petersohn, Svenja, Pouwels, Xavier G. L. V., Bansback, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33174513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20961091
_version_ 1783611203708256256
author Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
Carlson, Josh
Zimmermann, Marita
Jongen, Peter J.
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Petersohn, Svenja
Pouwels, Xavier G. L. V.
Bansback, Nick
author_facet Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
Carlson, Josh
Zimmermann, Marita
Jongen, Peter J.
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Petersohn, Svenja
Pouwels, Xavier G. L. V.
Bansback, Nick
author_sort Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up to 31% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) discontinue treatment with disease-modifying drug (DMD) within the first year, and of the patients who do continue, about 40% are nonadherent. Shared decision making may decrease nonadherence and discontinuation rates, but evidence in the context of RRMS is limited. Shared decision making may, however, come at additional costs. This study aimed to explore the potential cost-effectiveness of shared decision making for RRMS in comparison with usual care, from a (limited) societal perspective over a lifetime. METHODS: An exploratory economic evaluation was conducted by adapting a previously developed state transition model that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a range of DMDs for RRMS in comparison with the best supportive care. Three potential effects of shared decision making were explored: 1) a change in the initial DMD chosen, 2) a decrease in the patient’s discontinuation in using the DMD, and 3) an increase in adherence to the DMD. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of a scenario that combined the 3 effects were conducted. RESULTS: Each effect separately and the 3 effects combined resulted in higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs due to the increased utilization of DMD. A decrease in discontinuation of DMDs influenced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) most. The combined scenario resulted in an ICER of €17,875 per QALY gained. The ICER was sensitive to changes in several parameters. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that shared decision making for DMDs could potentially be cost-effective, especially if shared decision making would help to decrease treatment discontinuation. Our results, however, may depend on the assumed effects on treatment choice, persistence, and adherence, which are actually largely unknown.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7672783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76727832020-12-03 Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model Kremer, Ingrid E. H. Hiligsmann, Mickael Carlson, Josh Zimmermann, Marita Jongen, Peter J. Evers, Silvia M. A. A. Petersohn, Svenja Pouwels, Xavier G. L. V. Bansback, Nick Med Decis Making Original Articles BACKGROUND: Up to 31% of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) discontinue treatment with disease-modifying drug (DMD) within the first year, and of the patients who do continue, about 40% are nonadherent. Shared decision making may decrease nonadherence and discontinuation rates, but evidence in the context of RRMS is limited. Shared decision making may, however, come at additional costs. This study aimed to explore the potential cost-effectiveness of shared decision making for RRMS in comparison with usual care, from a (limited) societal perspective over a lifetime. METHODS: An exploratory economic evaluation was conducted by adapting a previously developed state transition model that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a range of DMDs for RRMS in comparison with the best supportive care. Three potential effects of shared decision making were explored: 1) a change in the initial DMD chosen, 2) a decrease in the patient’s discontinuation in using the DMD, and 3) an increase in adherence to the DMD. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of a scenario that combined the 3 effects were conducted. RESULTS: Each effect separately and the 3 effects combined resulted in higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs due to the increased utilization of DMD. A decrease in discontinuation of DMDs influenced the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) most. The combined scenario resulted in an ICER of €17,875 per QALY gained. The ICER was sensitive to changes in several parameters. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that shared decision making for DMDs could potentially be cost-effective, especially if shared decision making would help to decrease treatment discontinuation. Our results, however, may depend on the assumed effects on treatment choice, persistence, and adherence, which are actually largely unknown. SAGE Publications 2020-11-11 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7672783/ /pubmed/33174513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20961091 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kremer, Ingrid E. H.
Hiligsmann, Mickael
Carlson, Josh
Zimmermann, Marita
Jongen, Peter J.
Evers, Silvia M. A. A.
Petersohn, Svenja
Pouwels, Xavier G. L. V.
Bansback, Nick
Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model
title Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model
title_full Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model
title_fullStr Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model
title_short Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model
title_sort exploring the cost effectiveness of shared decision making for choosing between disease-modifying drugs for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the netherlands: a state transition model
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33174513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20961091
work_keys_str_mv AT kremeringrideh exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT hiligsmannmickael exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT carlsonjosh exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT zimmermannmarita exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT jongenpeterj exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT everssilviamaa exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT petersohnsvenja exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT pouwelsxavierglv exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel
AT bansbacknick exploringthecosteffectivenessofshareddecisionmakingforchoosingbetweendiseasemodifyingdrugsforrelapsingremittingmultiplesclerosisinthenetherlandsastatetransitionmodel