Cargando…

Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic physicians typically apply a cast to immobilize a body part that has been injured. There have been no significant structural changes or advances in synthetic casts since the development of the modern cast. The Opencast(®) is a recently developed type of cast that allows ventil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Min, Byung Cho, Yoon, Ji Soo, Chung, Chin Youb, Park, Moon Seok, Sung, Ki Hyuk, Lee, Kyoung Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269215
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.492
_version_ 1783611208230764544
author Min, Byung Cho
Yoon, Ji Soo
Chung, Chin Youb
Park, Moon Seok
Sung, Ki Hyuk
Lee, Kyoung Min
author_facet Min, Byung Cho
Yoon, Ji Soo
Chung, Chin Youb
Park, Moon Seok
Sung, Ki Hyuk
Lee, Kyoung Min
author_sort Min, Byung Cho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Orthopedic physicians typically apply a cast to immobilize a body part that has been injured. There have been no significant structural changes or advances in synthetic casts since the development of the modern cast. The Opencast(®) is a recently developed type of cast that allows ventilation and direct visual inspection of the skin to avoid cast-related complications. Although this novel cast appears to have more benefits than the conventional synthetic cast, its clinical efficacy and advantages have not been established. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of the newly developed Opencast(®) based on patients’ perspectives in those with ankle inversion injury. METHODS: A specifically designed questionnaire consisting of 19 items was used to compare patients’ opinions and concerns of the Opencast(®) and the conventional synthetic cast. The items were focused on subjective patient satisfaction, discomfort, and adverse effects while wearing the cast. Patients with an ankle inversion injury diagnosed as a high-grade ankle sprain were enrolled. The subjects were randomized and instructed to fill the questionnaire after wearing a synthetic cast or an Opencast(®) for 2 wk. They were then required to fill the questionnaire again, after switching to the alternative type of cast for 2 more weeks. RESULTS: A total of 22 subjects participated in the study. The synthetic cast appeared to be more rigid and stable than the Opencast(®), but there was no significant difference in the amount of pain relief. The likelihood of adverse effects when wearing the synthetic cast was significantly higher. Patient satisfaction tended to be rated higher after wearing the Opencast(®). Opencast(®) showed more subjective vulnerability than the synthetic cast, but there was no significant difference in the redo rate. Patients were more anxious about removal of the synthetic cast than of the Opencast(®). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the Opencast(®) could replace the conventional synthetic cast as it offers increased patient satisfaction, which would in turn increase compliance to treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7672803
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76728032020-12-01 Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains Min, Byung Cho Yoon, Ji Soo Chung, Chin Youb Park, Moon Seok Sung, Ki Hyuk Lee, Kyoung Min World J Orthop Randomized Controlled Trial BACKGROUND: Orthopedic physicians typically apply a cast to immobilize a body part that has been injured. There have been no significant structural changes or advances in synthetic casts since the development of the modern cast. The Opencast(®) is a recently developed type of cast that allows ventilation and direct visual inspection of the skin to avoid cast-related complications. Although this novel cast appears to have more benefits than the conventional synthetic cast, its clinical efficacy and advantages have not been established. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy and advantages of the newly developed Opencast(®) based on patients’ perspectives in those with ankle inversion injury. METHODS: A specifically designed questionnaire consisting of 19 items was used to compare patients’ opinions and concerns of the Opencast(®) and the conventional synthetic cast. The items were focused on subjective patient satisfaction, discomfort, and adverse effects while wearing the cast. Patients with an ankle inversion injury diagnosed as a high-grade ankle sprain were enrolled. The subjects were randomized and instructed to fill the questionnaire after wearing a synthetic cast or an Opencast(®) for 2 wk. They were then required to fill the questionnaire again, after switching to the alternative type of cast for 2 more weeks. RESULTS: A total of 22 subjects participated in the study. The synthetic cast appeared to be more rigid and stable than the Opencast(®), but there was no significant difference in the amount of pain relief. The likelihood of adverse effects when wearing the synthetic cast was significantly higher. Patient satisfaction tended to be rated higher after wearing the Opencast(®). Opencast(®) showed more subjective vulnerability than the synthetic cast, but there was no significant difference in the redo rate. Patients were more anxious about removal of the synthetic cast than of the Opencast(®). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the Opencast(®) could replace the conventional synthetic cast as it offers increased patient satisfaction, which would in turn increase compliance to treatment. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7672803/ /pubmed/33269215 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.492 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Randomized Controlled Trial
Min, Byung Cho
Yoon, Ji Soo
Chung, Chin Youb
Park, Moon Seok
Sung, Ki Hyuk
Lee, Kyoung Min
Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
title Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
title_full Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
title_fullStr Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
title_short Patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
title_sort patients’ perspectives on the conventional synthetic cast vs a newly developed open cast for ankle sprains
topic Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672803/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33269215
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.492
work_keys_str_mv AT minbyungcho patientsperspectivesontheconventionalsyntheticcastvsanewlydevelopedopencastforanklesprains
AT yoonjisoo patientsperspectivesontheconventionalsyntheticcastvsanewlydevelopedopencastforanklesprains
AT chungchinyoub patientsperspectivesontheconventionalsyntheticcastvsanewlydevelopedopencastforanklesprains
AT parkmoonseok patientsperspectivesontheconventionalsyntheticcastvsanewlydevelopedopencastforanklesprains
AT sungkihyuk patientsperspectivesontheconventionalsyntheticcastvsanewlydevelopedopencastforanklesprains
AT leekyoungmin patientsperspectivesontheconventionalsyntheticcastvsanewlydevelopedopencastforanklesprains