Cargando…
Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis
BACKGROUND: With a suite of promising new RSV prophylactics on the horizon, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and new vaccines, it is likely that one or more of these will replace the current monoclonal Palivizumab programme. However, choosing the optimal intervention programme will requir...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01802-8 |
_version_ | 1783611211744542720 |
---|---|
author | Hodgson, David Pebody, Richard Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina Baguelin, Marc Atkins, Katherine E. |
author_facet | Hodgson, David Pebody, Richard Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina Baguelin, Marc Atkins, Katherine E. |
author_sort | Hodgson, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With a suite of promising new RSV prophylactics on the horizon, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and new vaccines, it is likely that one or more of these will replace the current monoclonal Palivizumab programme. However, choosing the optimal intervention programme will require balancing the costs of the programmes with the health benefits accrued. METHODS: To compare the next generation of RSV prophylactics, we integrated a novel transmission model with an economic analysis. We estimated key epidemiological parameters by calibrating the model to 7 years of historical epidemiological data using a Bayesian approach. We determined the cost-effective and affordable maximum purchase price for a comprehensive suite of intervention programmes. FINDINGS: Our transmission model suggests that maternal protection of infants is seasonal, with 38–62% of infants born with protection against RSV. Our economic analysis found that to cost-effectively and affordably replace the current monoclonal antibody Palivizumab programme with long-acting monoclonal antibodies, the purchase price per dose would have to be less than around £4350 but dropping to £200 for vaccinated heightened risk infants or £90 for all infants. A seasonal maternal vaccine would have to be priced less than £85 to be cost-effective and affordable. While vaccinating pre-school and school-age children is likely not cost-effective relative to elderly vaccination programmes, vaccinating the elderly is not likely to be affordable. Conversely, vaccinating infants at 2 months seasonally would be cost-effective and affordable if priced less than £80. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting with seasonal RSV epidemiology, maternal protection conferred to newborns is also seasonal, an assumption not previously incorporated in transmission models of RSV. For a country with seasonal RSV dynamics like England, seasonal programmes rather than year-round intervention programmes are always optimal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7672821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76728212020-11-19 Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis Hodgson, David Pebody, Richard Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina Baguelin, Marc Atkins, Katherine E. BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: With a suite of promising new RSV prophylactics on the horizon, including long-acting monoclonal antibodies and new vaccines, it is likely that one or more of these will replace the current monoclonal Palivizumab programme. However, choosing the optimal intervention programme will require balancing the costs of the programmes with the health benefits accrued. METHODS: To compare the next generation of RSV prophylactics, we integrated a novel transmission model with an economic analysis. We estimated key epidemiological parameters by calibrating the model to 7 years of historical epidemiological data using a Bayesian approach. We determined the cost-effective and affordable maximum purchase price for a comprehensive suite of intervention programmes. FINDINGS: Our transmission model suggests that maternal protection of infants is seasonal, with 38–62% of infants born with protection against RSV. Our economic analysis found that to cost-effectively and affordably replace the current monoclonal antibody Palivizumab programme with long-acting monoclonal antibodies, the purchase price per dose would have to be less than around £4350 but dropping to £200 for vaccinated heightened risk infants or £90 for all infants. A seasonal maternal vaccine would have to be priced less than £85 to be cost-effective and affordable. While vaccinating pre-school and school-age children is likely not cost-effective relative to elderly vaccination programmes, vaccinating the elderly is not likely to be affordable. Conversely, vaccinating infants at 2 months seasonally would be cost-effective and affordable if priced less than £80. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting with seasonal RSV epidemiology, maternal protection conferred to newborns is also seasonal, an assumption not previously incorporated in transmission models of RSV. For a country with seasonal RSV dynamics like England, seasonal programmes rather than year-round intervention programmes are always optimal. BioMed Central 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7672821/ /pubmed/33203423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01802-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hodgson, David Pebody, Richard Panovska-Griffiths, Jasmina Baguelin, Marc Atkins, Katherine E. Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | Evaluating the next generation of RSV intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | evaluating the next generation of rsv intervention strategies: a mathematical modelling study and cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01802-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hodgsondavid evaluatingthenextgenerationofrsvinterventionstrategiesamathematicalmodellingstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT pebodyrichard evaluatingthenextgenerationofrsvinterventionstrategiesamathematicalmodellingstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT panovskagriffithsjasmina evaluatingthenextgenerationofrsvinterventionstrategiesamathematicalmodellingstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT baguelinmarc evaluatingthenextgenerationofrsvinterventionstrategiesamathematicalmodellingstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis AT atkinskatherinee evaluatingthenextgenerationofrsvinterventionstrategiesamathematicalmodellingstudyandcosteffectivenessanalysis |