Cargando…
Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
BACKGROUND: In the Twin Birth Study, women at 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x |
_version_ | 1783611233670266880 |
---|---|
author | Dougan, C Gotha, L Melamed, N Aviram, A Asztalos, EV Anabusi, S Willan, AR Barrett, JFR Mei-Dan, E |
author_facet | Dougan, C Gotha, L Melamed, N Aviram, A Asztalos, EV Anabusi, S Willan, AR Barrett, JFR Mei-Dan, E |
author_sort | Dougan, C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the Twin Birth Study, women at 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode of delivery groups. We aimed to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes of twin gestations without spontaneous onset of labor, who underwent induction of labor or pre-labor cesarean section as the intervention of induction may affect outcomes. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study we compared those who had an induction of labor with those who had a pre-labor cesarean section. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: NCT00187369. RESULTS: Of the 2804 women included in the Twin Birth Study, a total of 1347 (48%) women required a delivery before a spontaneous onset of labor occurred: 568 (42%) in the planned vaginal delivery arm and 779 (58%) in the planned cesarean arm. Induction of labor was attempted in 409 (30%), and 938 (70%) had a pre-labor cesarean section. The rate of intrapartum cesarean section in the induction of labor group was 41.3%. The rate of the primary outcome was comparable between the pre-labor cesarean section group and induction of labor group (1.65% vs. 1.97%; p = 0.61; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.43–1.62). The maternal composite outcome was found to be lower with pre-labor cesarean section compared to induction of labor (7.25% vs. 11.25%; p = 0.01; OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41–0.91). CONCLUSION: In women with twin gestation between 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, induction of labor and pre-labor cesarean section have similar neonatal outcomes. Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with favorable maternal outcomes which differs from the overall Twin Birth Study results. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who are faced with the decision of interventional delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7672925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76729252020-11-19 Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study Dougan, C Gotha, L Melamed, N Aviram, A Asztalos, EV Anabusi, S Willan, AR Barrett, JFR Mei-Dan, E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In the Twin Birth Study, women at 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode of delivery groups. We aimed to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes of twin gestations without spontaneous onset of labor, who underwent induction of labor or pre-labor cesarean section as the intervention of induction may affect outcomes. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study we compared those who had an induction of labor with those who had a pre-labor cesarean section. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: NCT00187369. RESULTS: Of the 2804 women included in the Twin Birth Study, a total of 1347 (48%) women required a delivery before a spontaneous onset of labor occurred: 568 (42%) in the planned vaginal delivery arm and 779 (58%) in the planned cesarean arm. Induction of labor was attempted in 409 (30%), and 938 (70%) had a pre-labor cesarean section. The rate of intrapartum cesarean section in the induction of labor group was 41.3%. The rate of the primary outcome was comparable between the pre-labor cesarean section group and induction of labor group (1.65% vs. 1.97%; p = 0.61; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.43–1.62). The maternal composite outcome was found to be lower with pre-labor cesarean section compared to induction of labor (7.25% vs. 11.25%; p = 0.01; OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41–0.91). CONCLUSION: In women with twin gestation between 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, induction of labor and pre-labor cesarean section have similar neonatal outcomes. Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with favorable maternal outcomes which differs from the overall Twin Birth Study results. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who are faced with the decision of interventional delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x. BioMed Central 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7672925/ /pubmed/33203367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dougan, C Gotha, L Melamed, N Aviram, A Asztalos, EV Anabusi, S Willan, AR Barrett, JFR Mei-Dan, E Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
title | Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
title_full | Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
title_fullStr | Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
title_full_unstemmed | Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
title_short | Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
title_sort | cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT douganc cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT gothal cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT melamedn cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT avirama cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT asztalosev cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT anabusis cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT willanar cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT barrettjfr cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy AT meidane cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy |