Cargando…

Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study

BACKGROUND: In the Twin Birth Study, women at 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dougan, C, Gotha, L, Melamed, N, Aviram, A, Asztalos, EV, Anabusi, S, Willan, AR, Barrett, JFR, Mei-Dan, E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x
_version_ 1783611233670266880
author Dougan, C
Gotha, L
Melamed, N
Aviram, A
Asztalos, EV
Anabusi, S
Willan, AR
Barrett, JFR
Mei-Dan, E
author_facet Dougan, C
Gotha, L
Melamed, N
Aviram, A
Asztalos, EV
Anabusi, S
Willan, AR
Barrett, JFR
Mei-Dan, E
author_sort Dougan, C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the Twin Birth Study, women at 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode of delivery groups. We aimed to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes of twin gestations without spontaneous onset of labor, who underwent induction of labor or pre-labor cesarean section as the intervention of induction may affect outcomes. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study we compared those who had an induction of labor with those who had a pre-labor cesarean section. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: NCT00187369. RESULTS: Of the 2804 women included in the Twin Birth Study, a total of 1347 (48%) women required a delivery before a spontaneous onset of labor occurred: 568 (42%) in the planned vaginal delivery arm and 779 (58%) in the planned cesarean arm. Induction of labor was attempted in 409 (30%), and 938 (70%) had a pre-labor cesarean section. The rate of intrapartum cesarean section in the induction of labor group was 41.3%. The rate of the primary outcome was comparable between the pre-labor cesarean section group and induction of labor group (1.65% vs. 1.97%; p = 0.61; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.43–1.62). The maternal composite outcome was found to be lower with pre-labor cesarean section compared to induction of labor (7.25% vs. 11.25%; p = 0.01; OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41–0.91). CONCLUSION: In women with twin gestation between 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, induction of labor and pre-labor cesarean section have similar neonatal outcomes. Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with favorable maternal outcomes which differs from the overall Twin Birth Study results. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who are faced with the decision of interventional delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7672925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76729252020-11-19 Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study Dougan, C Gotha, L Melamed, N Aviram, A Asztalos, EV Anabusi, S Willan, AR Barrett, JFR Mei-Dan, E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: In the Twin Birth Study, women at 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, in whom the first twin was in cephalic presentation, were randomized to planned vaginal delivery or cesarean section. The study found no significant differences in neonatal or maternal outcomes in the two planned mode of delivery groups. We aimed to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes of twin gestations without spontaneous onset of labor, who underwent induction of labor or pre-labor cesarean section as the intervention of induction may affect outcomes. METHODS: In this secondary analysis of the Twin Birth Study we compared those who had an induction of labor with those who had a pre-labor cesarean section. The primary outcome was a composite of fetal or neonatal death or serious neonatal morbidity. Secondary outcome was a composite of maternal morbidity and mortality. Trial Registration: NCT00187369. RESULTS: Of the 2804 women included in the Twin Birth Study, a total of 1347 (48%) women required a delivery before a spontaneous onset of labor occurred: 568 (42%) in the planned vaginal delivery arm and 779 (58%) in the planned cesarean arm. Induction of labor was attempted in 409 (30%), and 938 (70%) had a pre-labor cesarean section. The rate of intrapartum cesarean section in the induction of labor group was 41.3%. The rate of the primary outcome was comparable between the pre-labor cesarean section group and induction of labor group (1.65% vs. 1.97%; p = 0.61; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.43–1.62). The maternal composite outcome was found to be lower with pre-labor cesarean section compared to induction of labor (7.25% vs. 11.25%; p = 0.01; OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.41–0.91). CONCLUSION: In women with twin gestation between 32(0/7)–38(6/7) weeks of gestation, induction of labor and pre-labor cesarean section have similar neonatal outcomes. Pre-labor cesarean section is associated with favorable maternal outcomes which differs from the overall Twin Birth Study results. These data may be used to better counsel women with twin gestation who are faced with the decision of interventional delivery. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x. BioMed Central 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7672925/ /pubmed/33203367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dougan, C
Gotha, L
Melamed, N
Aviram, A
Asztalos, EV
Anabusi, S
Willan, AR
Barrett, JFR
Mei-Dan, E
Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
title Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
title_full Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
title_fullStr Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
title_short Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
title_sort cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03369-x
work_keys_str_mv AT douganc cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT gothal cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT melamedn cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT avirama cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT asztalosev cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT anabusis cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT willanar cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT barrettjfr cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy
AT meidane cesareandeliveryorinductionoflaborinprelabortwingestationsasecondaryanalysisofthetwinbirthstudy