Cargando…

Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept

BACKGROUND: The Ganz’ periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) consists of four technically challenging osteotomies (OT), namely, supraacetabular (saOT), pubic (pOT), ischial (iOT), and retroacetabular OT (raOT). PURPOSE: We performed a proof of concept study to test (1) the feasibility of augmented reality (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiarostami, Pascal, Dennler, Cyrill, Roner, Simon, Sutter, Reto, Fürnstahl, Philipp, Farshad, Mazda, Rahm, Stefan, Zingg, Patrick O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02066-x
_version_ 1783611237906513920
author Kiarostami, Pascal
Dennler, Cyrill
Roner, Simon
Sutter, Reto
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Farshad, Mazda
Rahm, Stefan
Zingg, Patrick O.
author_facet Kiarostami, Pascal
Dennler, Cyrill
Roner, Simon
Sutter, Reto
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Farshad, Mazda
Rahm, Stefan
Zingg, Patrick O.
author_sort Kiarostami, Pascal
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Ganz’ periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) consists of four technically challenging osteotomies (OT), namely, supraacetabular (saOT), pubic (pOT), ischial (iOT), and retroacetabular OT (raOT). PURPOSE: We performed a proof of concept study to test (1) the feasibility of augmented reality (AR) guidance for PAO, (2) precision of the OTs guided by AR compared to the freehand technique performed by an experienced PAO surgeon, and (3) the effect of AR on performance depending on experience. METHODS: A 3D preoperative plan of a PAO was created from segmented computed tomography (CT) data of an anatomic plastic pelvis model (PPM). The plan was then embedded in a software application for an AR head-mounted device. Soft tissue coverage was imitated using foam rubber. The 3D plan was then registered onto the PPM using an anatomical landmark registration. Two surgeons (one experienced and one novice PAO surgeon) each performed 15 freehand (FH) and 15 AR-guided PAOs. The starting point distances and angulation between the planned and executed OT planes for the FH and the AR-guided PAOs were compared in post-intervention CTs. RESULTS: AR guidance did not affect the performance of the expert surgeon in terms of the mean differences between the planned and executed starting points, but the raOT angle was more accurate as compared to FH PAO (p = 0.0027). AR guidance increased the accuracy of the performance of the novice surgeon for iOT (p = 0.03). An intraarticular osteotomy performed by the novice surgeon with the FH technique could be observed only once. CONCLUSION: AR guidance of osteotomies for PAOs is feasible and seems to increase accuracy. The effect is more accentuated for less-experienced surgeons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is the first proof of concept study documenting the feasibility of AR guidance for PAO. Based on these findings, further studies are essential for elaborating on the potential merits of AR guidance to increase the accuracy of complex surgical procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7672946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76729462020-11-19 Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept Kiarostami, Pascal Dennler, Cyrill Roner, Simon Sutter, Reto Fürnstahl, Philipp Farshad, Mazda Rahm, Stefan Zingg, Patrick O. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Ganz’ periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) consists of four technically challenging osteotomies (OT), namely, supraacetabular (saOT), pubic (pOT), ischial (iOT), and retroacetabular OT (raOT). PURPOSE: We performed a proof of concept study to test (1) the feasibility of augmented reality (AR) guidance for PAO, (2) precision of the OTs guided by AR compared to the freehand technique performed by an experienced PAO surgeon, and (3) the effect of AR on performance depending on experience. METHODS: A 3D preoperative plan of a PAO was created from segmented computed tomography (CT) data of an anatomic plastic pelvis model (PPM). The plan was then embedded in a software application for an AR head-mounted device. Soft tissue coverage was imitated using foam rubber. The 3D plan was then registered onto the PPM using an anatomical landmark registration. Two surgeons (one experienced and one novice PAO surgeon) each performed 15 freehand (FH) and 15 AR-guided PAOs. The starting point distances and angulation between the planned and executed OT planes for the FH and the AR-guided PAOs were compared in post-intervention CTs. RESULTS: AR guidance did not affect the performance of the expert surgeon in terms of the mean differences between the planned and executed starting points, but the raOT angle was more accurate as compared to FH PAO (p = 0.0027). AR guidance increased the accuracy of the performance of the novice surgeon for iOT (p = 0.03). An intraarticular osteotomy performed by the novice surgeon with the FH technique could be observed only once. CONCLUSION: AR guidance of osteotomies for PAOs is feasible and seems to increase accuracy. The effect is more accentuated for less-experienced surgeons. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is the first proof of concept study documenting the feasibility of AR guidance for PAO. Based on these findings, further studies are essential for elaborating on the potential merits of AR guidance to increase the accuracy of complex surgical procedures. BioMed Central 2020-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7672946/ /pubmed/33203429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02066-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kiarostami, Pascal
Dennler, Cyrill
Roner, Simon
Sutter, Reto
Fürnstahl, Philipp
Farshad, Mazda
Rahm, Stefan
Zingg, Patrick O.
Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
title Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
title_full Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
title_fullStr Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
title_full_unstemmed Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
title_short Augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
title_sort augmented reality-guided periacetabular osteotomy—proof of concept
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7672946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33203429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02066-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kiarostamipascal augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT dennlercyrill augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT ronersimon augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT sutterreto augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT furnstahlphilipp augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT farshadmazda augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT rahmstefan augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept
AT zinggpatricko augmentedrealityguidedperiacetabularosteotomyproofofconcept