Cargando…
Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of COVID-19, which has had a devastating international impact. Prior reports of testing have reported low sensitivities of nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reports of viral co-infections have varied from 0–20%. Therefor...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7673872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33052811 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48420 |
_version_ | 1783611403749294080 |
---|---|
author | Gopaul, Ravindra Davis, Joshua Gangai, Linda Goetz, Lianna |
author_facet | Gopaul, Ravindra Davis, Joshua Gangai, Linda Goetz, Lianna |
author_sort | Gopaul, Ravindra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of COVID-19, which has had a devastating international impact. Prior reports of testing have reported low sensitivities of nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reports of viral co-infections have varied from 0–20%. Therefore, we sought to determine the accuracy of nasopharyngeal PCR for COVID-19 and rates of viral co-infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who received viral testing between March 1, 2020–April 28, 2020. Test results of a complete viral pathogen panel and COVID-19 testing were abstracted. We compared patients with more than one COVID-19 test for diagnostic accuracy against the gold standard of chart review. RESULTS: We identified 1950 patients, of whom 1024 were tested for COVID-19. There were 221 repeat tests for COVID-19. Among patients with a repeat test, COVID-19 swabs had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 69.5–94.4%) and a specificity of 99.5% (95%CI, 97–100%) compared to a clinical and radiographic criterion reference by chart review. We found viral co-infection rates of 2.3% in patients without COVID-19 and 6.1% in patients with COVID-19. Rates of co-infection appeared to be related to base rates of infection in the community and not a specific property of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR specimens are accurate but have imperfect sensitivity. Repeat testing for high-risk patients should be considered, and presence of an alternative virus should not be used to limit testing for COVID-19 for patients where it would affect treatment or isolation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7673872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76738722020-11-24 Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Gopaul, Ravindra Davis, Joshua Gangai, Linda Goetz, Lianna West J Emerg Med Endemic Infections INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of COVID-19, which has had a devastating international impact. Prior reports of testing have reported low sensitivities of nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and reports of viral co-infections have varied from 0–20%. Therefore, we sought to determine the accuracy of nasopharyngeal PCR for COVID-19 and rates of viral co-infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who received viral testing between March 1, 2020–April 28, 2020. Test results of a complete viral pathogen panel and COVID-19 testing were abstracted. We compared patients with more than one COVID-19 test for diagnostic accuracy against the gold standard of chart review. RESULTS: We identified 1950 patients, of whom 1024 were tested for COVID-19. There were 221 repeat tests for COVID-19. Among patients with a repeat test, COVID-19 swabs had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 69.5–94.4%) and a specificity of 99.5% (95%CI, 97–100%) compared to a clinical and radiographic criterion reference by chart review. We found viral co-infection rates of 2.3% in patients without COVID-19 and 6.1% in patients with COVID-19. Rates of co-infection appeared to be related to base rates of infection in the community and not a specific property of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 nasopharyngeal PCR specimens are accurate but have imperfect sensitivity. Repeat testing for high-risk patients should be considered, and presence of an alternative virus should not be used to limit testing for COVID-19 for patients where it would affect treatment or isolation. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2020-11 2020-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7673872/ /pubmed/33052811 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48420 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Gopaul et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Endemic Infections Gopaul, Ravindra Davis, Joshua Gangai, Linda Goetz, Lianna Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
title | Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
title_full | Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
title_fullStr | Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
title_full_unstemmed | Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
title_short | Practical Diagnostic Accuracy of Nasopharyngeal Swab Testing for Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
title_sort | practical diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal swab testing for novel coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) |
topic | Endemic Infections |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7673872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33052811 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.8.48420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gopaulravindra practicaldiagnosticaccuracyofnasopharyngealswabtestingfornovelcoronavirusdisease2019covid19 AT davisjoshua practicaldiagnosticaccuracyofnasopharyngealswabtestingfornovelcoronavirusdisease2019covid19 AT gangailinda practicaldiagnosticaccuracyofnasopharyngealswabtestingfornovelcoronavirusdisease2019covid19 AT goetzlianna practicaldiagnosticaccuracyofnasopharyngealswabtestingfornovelcoronavirusdisease2019covid19 |