Cargando…
Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three water immersion interventions performed after active recovery compared to active recovery only on the resolution of inflammation and markers of muscle damage post-exercise. METHODS: Nine physically active men (n = 9; age 20‒35 years...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8 |
_version_ | 1783611482153418752 |
---|---|
author | Ahokas, E. K. Kyröläinen, H. Mero, A. A. Walker, S. Hanstock, H. G. Ihalainen, J. K. |
author_facet | Ahokas, E. K. Kyröläinen, H. Mero, A. A. Walker, S. Hanstock, H. G. Ihalainen, J. K. |
author_sort | Ahokas, E. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three water immersion interventions performed after active recovery compared to active recovery only on the resolution of inflammation and markers of muscle damage post-exercise. METHODS: Nine physically active men (n = 9; age 20‒35 years) performed an intensive loading protocol, including maximal jumps and sprinting on four occasions. After each trial, one of three recovery interventions (10 min duration) was used in a random order: cold-water immersion (CWI, 10 °C), thermoneutral water immersion (TWI, 24 °C), contrast water therapy (CWT, alternately 10 °C and 38 °C). All of these methods were performed after an active recovery (10 min bicycle ergometer), and were compared to active recovery only (ACT). 5 min, 1, 24, 48, and 96 h after exercise bouts, immune response and recovery were assessed through leukocyte subsets, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, myoglobin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. RESULTS: Significant changes in all blood markers occurred at post-loading (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences observed in the recovery between methods. However, retrospective analysis revealed significant trial-order effects for myoglobin and neutrophils (p < 0.01). Only lymphocytes displayed satisfactory reliability in the exercise response, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The recovery methods did not affect the resolution of inflammatory and immune responses after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise. It is notable that the biomarker responses were variable within individuals. Thus, the lack of differences between recovery methods may have been influenced by the reliability of exercise-induced biomarker responses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7674333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76743332020-11-30 Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise Ahokas, E. K. Kyröläinen, H. Mero, A. A. Walker, S. Hanstock, H. G. Ihalainen, J. K. Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of three water immersion interventions performed after active recovery compared to active recovery only on the resolution of inflammation and markers of muscle damage post-exercise. METHODS: Nine physically active men (n = 9; age 20‒35 years) performed an intensive loading protocol, including maximal jumps and sprinting on four occasions. After each trial, one of three recovery interventions (10 min duration) was used in a random order: cold-water immersion (CWI, 10 °C), thermoneutral water immersion (TWI, 24 °C), contrast water therapy (CWT, alternately 10 °C and 38 °C). All of these methods were performed after an active recovery (10 min bicycle ergometer), and were compared to active recovery only (ACT). 5 min, 1, 24, 48, and 96 h after exercise bouts, immune response and recovery were assessed through leukocyte subsets, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, myoglobin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations. RESULTS: Significant changes in all blood markers occurred at post-loading (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences observed in the recovery between methods. However, retrospective analysis revealed significant trial-order effects for myoglobin and neutrophils (p < 0.01). Only lymphocytes displayed satisfactory reliability in the exercise response, with intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The recovery methods did not affect the resolution of inflammatory and immune responses after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise. It is notable that the biomarker responses were variable within individuals. Thus, the lack of differences between recovery methods may have been influenced by the reliability of exercise-induced biomarker responses. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-09-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7674333/ /pubmed/32880050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ahokas, E. K. Kyröläinen, H. Mero, A. A. Walker, S. Hanstock, H. G. Ihalainen, J. K. Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
title | Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
title_full | Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
title_fullStr | Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
title_full_unstemmed | Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
title_short | Water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
title_sort | water immersion methods do not alter muscle damage and inflammation biomarkers after high-intensity sprinting and jumping exercise |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32880050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-020-04481-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahokasek waterimmersionmethodsdonotaltermuscledamageandinflammationbiomarkersafterhighintensitysprintingandjumpingexercise AT kyrolainenh waterimmersionmethodsdonotaltermuscledamageandinflammationbiomarkersafterhighintensitysprintingandjumpingexercise AT meroaa waterimmersionmethodsdonotaltermuscledamageandinflammationbiomarkersafterhighintensitysprintingandjumpingexercise AT walkers waterimmersionmethodsdonotaltermuscledamageandinflammationbiomarkersafterhighintensitysprintingandjumpingexercise AT hanstockhg waterimmersionmethodsdonotaltermuscledamageandinflammationbiomarkersafterhighintensitysprintingandjumpingexercise AT ihalainenjk waterimmersionmethodsdonotaltermuscledamageandinflammationbiomarkersafterhighintensitysprintingandjumpingexercise |