Cargando…
Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort
BACKGROUND: Deep grey matter (DGM) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its relation to cognitive and clinical decline requires accurate measurements. MS pathology may deteriorate the performance of automated segmentation methods. Accuracy of DGM segmentation methods is compared between MS and con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32621103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1 |
_version_ | 1783611530514792448 |
---|---|
author | de Sitter, Alexandra Verhoeven, Tom Burggraaff, Jessica Liu, Yaou Simoes, Jorge Ruggieri, Serena Palotai, Miklos Brouwer, Iman Versteeg, Adriaan Wottschel, Viktor Ropele, Stefan Rocca, Mara A. Gasperini, Claudio Gallo, Antonio Yiannakas, Marios C. Rovira, Alex Enzinger, Christian Filippi, Massimo De Stefano, Nicola Kappos, Ludwig Frederiksen, Jette L. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Guttmann, Charles R. G. Vrenken, Hugo |
author_facet | de Sitter, Alexandra Verhoeven, Tom Burggraaff, Jessica Liu, Yaou Simoes, Jorge Ruggieri, Serena Palotai, Miklos Brouwer, Iman Versteeg, Adriaan Wottschel, Viktor Ropele, Stefan Rocca, Mara A. Gasperini, Claudio Gallo, Antonio Yiannakas, Marios C. Rovira, Alex Enzinger, Christian Filippi, Massimo De Stefano, Nicola Kappos, Ludwig Frederiksen, Jette L. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Guttmann, Charles R. G. Vrenken, Hugo |
author_sort | de Sitter, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Deep grey matter (DGM) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its relation to cognitive and clinical decline requires accurate measurements. MS pathology may deteriorate the performance of automated segmentation methods. Accuracy of DGM segmentation methods is compared between MS and controls, and the relation of performance with lesions and atrophy is studied. METHODS: On images of 21 MS subjects and 11 controls, three raters manually outlined caudate nucleus, putamen and thalamus; outlines were combined by majority voting. FSL-FIRST, FreeSurfer, Geodesic Information Flow and volBrain were evaluated. Performance was evaluated volumetrically (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)) and spatially (Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)). Spearman's correlations of DSC with global and local lesion volume, structure of interest volume (ROIV), and normalized brain volume (NBV) were assessed. RESULTS: ICC with manual volumes was mostly good and spatial agreement was high. MS exhibited significantly lower DSC than controls for thalamus and putamen. For some combinations of structure and method, DSC correlated negatively with lesion volume or positively with NBV or ROIV. Lesion-filling did not substantially change segmentations. CONCLUSIONS: Automated methods have impaired performance in patients. Performance generally deteriorated with higher lesion volume and lower NBV and ROIV, suggesting that these may contribute to the impaired performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7674567 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76745672020-11-30 Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort de Sitter, Alexandra Verhoeven, Tom Burggraaff, Jessica Liu, Yaou Simoes, Jorge Ruggieri, Serena Palotai, Miklos Brouwer, Iman Versteeg, Adriaan Wottschel, Viktor Ropele, Stefan Rocca, Mara A. Gasperini, Claudio Gallo, Antonio Yiannakas, Marios C. Rovira, Alex Enzinger, Christian Filippi, Massimo De Stefano, Nicola Kappos, Ludwig Frederiksen, Jette L. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Guttmann, Charles R. G. Vrenken, Hugo J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Deep grey matter (DGM) atrophy in multiple sclerosis (MS) and its relation to cognitive and clinical decline requires accurate measurements. MS pathology may deteriorate the performance of automated segmentation methods. Accuracy of DGM segmentation methods is compared between MS and controls, and the relation of performance with lesions and atrophy is studied. METHODS: On images of 21 MS subjects and 11 controls, three raters manually outlined caudate nucleus, putamen and thalamus; outlines were combined by majority voting. FSL-FIRST, FreeSurfer, Geodesic Information Flow and volBrain were evaluated. Performance was evaluated volumetrically (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC)) and spatially (Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)). Spearman's correlations of DSC with global and local lesion volume, structure of interest volume (ROIV), and normalized brain volume (NBV) were assessed. RESULTS: ICC with manual volumes was mostly good and spatial agreement was high. MS exhibited significantly lower DSC than controls for thalamus and putamen. For some combinations of structure and method, DSC correlated negatively with lesion volume or positively with NBV or ROIV. Lesion-filling did not substantially change segmentations. CONCLUSIONS: Automated methods have impaired performance in patients. Performance generally deteriorated with higher lesion volume and lower NBV and ROIV, suggesting that these may contribute to the impaired performance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7674567/ /pubmed/32621103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Communication de Sitter, Alexandra Verhoeven, Tom Burggraaff, Jessica Liu, Yaou Simoes, Jorge Ruggieri, Serena Palotai, Miklos Brouwer, Iman Versteeg, Adriaan Wottschel, Viktor Ropele, Stefan Rocca, Mara A. Gasperini, Claudio Gallo, Antonio Yiannakas, Marios C. Rovira, Alex Enzinger, Christian Filippi, Massimo De Stefano, Nicola Kappos, Ludwig Frederiksen, Jette L. Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. Barkhof, Frederik Guttmann, Charles R. G. Vrenken, Hugo Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
title | Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
title_full | Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
title_fullStr | Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
title_short | Reduced accuracy of MRI deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
title_sort | reduced accuracy of mri deep grey matter segmentation in multiple sclerosis: an evaluation of four automated methods against manual reference segmentations in a multi-center cohort |
topic | Original Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674567/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32621103 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10023-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desitteralexandra reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT verhoeventom reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT burggraaffjessica reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT liuyaou reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT simoesjorge reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT ruggieriserena reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT palotaimiklos reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT brouweriman reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT versteegadriaan reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT wottschelviktor reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT ropelestefan reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT roccamaraa reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT gasperiniclaudio reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT galloantonio reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT yiannakasmariosc reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT roviraalex reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT enzingerchristian reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT filippimassimo reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT destefanonicola reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT kapposludwig reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT frederiksenjettel reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT uitdehaagbernardmj reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT barkhoffrederik reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT guttmanncharlesrg reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT vrenkenhugo reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort AT reducedaccuracyofmrideepgreymattersegmentationinmultiplesclerosisanevaluationoffourautomatedmethodsagainstmanualreferencesegmentationsinamulticentercohort |