Cargando…

Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds

The influence of delayed auditory feedback on action evaluation and execution of real-life action-induced sounds apart from language and music is still poorly understood. Here, we examined how a temporal delay impacted the behavioral evaluation and neural representation of hurdling and tap-dancing a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heins, Nina, Trempler, Ima, Zentgraf, Karen, Raab, Markus, Schubotz, Ricarda I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33250704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573970
_version_ 1783611552975290368
author Heins, Nina
Trempler, Ima
Zentgraf, Karen
Raab, Markus
Schubotz, Ricarda I.
author_facet Heins, Nina
Trempler, Ima
Zentgraf, Karen
Raab, Markus
Schubotz, Ricarda I.
author_sort Heins, Nina
collection PubMed
description The influence of delayed auditory feedback on action evaluation and execution of real-life action-induced sounds apart from language and music is still poorly understood. Here, we examined how a temporal delay impacted the behavioral evaluation and neural representation of hurdling and tap-dancing actions in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, postulating that effects of delay diverge between the two, as we create action-induced sounds intentionally in tap dancing, but incidentally in hurdling. Based on previous findings, we expected that conditions differ regarding the engagement of the supplementary motor area (SMA), posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), and primary auditory cortex (A1). Participants were videotaped during a 9-week training of hurdling and tap dancing; in the fMRI scanner, they were presented with point-light videos of their own training videos, including the original or the slightly delayed sound, and had to evaluate how well they performed on each single trial. For the undelayed conditions, we replicated A1 attenuation and enhanced pSTG and SMA engagement for tap dancing (intentionally generated sounds) vs. hurdling (incidentally generated sounds). Delayed auditory feedback did not negatively influence behavioral rating scores in general. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response transiently increased and then adapted to repeated presentation of point-light videos with delayed sound in pSTG. This region also showed a significantly stronger correlation with the SMA under delayed feedback. Notably, SMA activation increased more for delayed feedback in the tap-dancing condition, covarying with higher rating scores. Findings suggest that action evaluation is more strongly based on top–down predictions from SMA when sounds of intentional action are distorted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7674666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76746662020-11-26 Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds Heins, Nina Trempler, Ima Zentgraf, Karen Raab, Markus Schubotz, Ricarda I. Front Neurosci Neuroscience The influence of delayed auditory feedback on action evaluation and execution of real-life action-induced sounds apart from language and music is still poorly understood. Here, we examined how a temporal delay impacted the behavioral evaluation and neural representation of hurdling and tap-dancing actions in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment, postulating that effects of delay diverge between the two, as we create action-induced sounds intentionally in tap dancing, but incidentally in hurdling. Based on previous findings, we expected that conditions differ regarding the engagement of the supplementary motor area (SMA), posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), and primary auditory cortex (A1). Participants were videotaped during a 9-week training of hurdling and tap dancing; in the fMRI scanner, they were presented with point-light videos of their own training videos, including the original or the slightly delayed sound, and had to evaluate how well they performed on each single trial. For the undelayed conditions, we replicated A1 attenuation and enhanced pSTG and SMA engagement for tap dancing (intentionally generated sounds) vs. hurdling (incidentally generated sounds). Delayed auditory feedback did not negatively influence behavioral rating scores in general. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response transiently increased and then adapted to repeated presentation of point-light videos with delayed sound in pSTG. This region also showed a significantly stronger correlation with the SMA under delayed feedback. Notably, SMA activation increased more for delayed feedback in the tap-dancing condition, covarying with higher rating scores. Findings suggest that action evaluation is more strongly based on top–down predictions from SMA when sounds of intentional action are distorted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7674666/ /pubmed/33250704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573970 Text en Copyright © 2020 Heins, Trempler, Zentgraf, Raab and Schubotz. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Heins, Nina
Trempler, Ima
Zentgraf, Karen
Raab, Markus
Schubotz, Ricarda I.
Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds
title Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds
title_full Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds
title_fullStr Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds
title_full_unstemmed Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds
title_short Too Late! Influence of Temporal Delay on the Neural Processing of One’s Own Incidental and Intentional Action-Induced Sounds
title_sort too late! influence of temporal delay on the neural processing of one’s own incidental and intentional action-induced sounds
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33250704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.573970
work_keys_str_mv AT heinsnina toolateinfluenceoftemporaldelayontheneuralprocessingofonesownincidentalandintentionalactioninducedsounds
AT tremplerima toolateinfluenceoftemporaldelayontheneuralprocessingofonesownincidentalandintentionalactioninducedsounds
AT zentgrafkaren toolateinfluenceoftemporaldelayontheneuralprocessingofonesownincidentalandintentionalactioninducedsounds
AT raabmarkus toolateinfluenceoftemporaldelayontheneuralprocessingofonesownincidentalandintentionalactioninducedsounds
AT schubotzricardai toolateinfluenceoftemporaldelayontheneuralprocessingofonesownincidentalandintentionalactioninducedsounds