Cargando…

Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the failure loads and compressive stresses among bilayered press on Y-TZP (POZ) and press on metal (POM) crowns with different core-veneer thickness. METHODS: Thirty metal and Y-TZP copings were fabricated using CAD-CAM technology with specified thicknes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vohra, Fahim, Shuwaish, Mohammed Bin, Deeb, Modhi Al, Alhamdan, Rana, Alotaibi, Naif, Abduljabbar, Tariq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235590
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2472
_version_ 1783611604240171008
author Vohra, Fahim
Shuwaish, Mohammed Bin
Deeb, Modhi Al
Alhamdan, Rana
Alotaibi, Naif
Abduljabbar, Tariq
author_facet Vohra, Fahim
Shuwaish, Mohammed Bin
Deeb, Modhi Al
Alhamdan, Rana
Alotaibi, Naif
Abduljabbar, Tariq
author_sort Vohra, Fahim
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the failure loads and compressive stresses among bilayered press on Y-TZP (POZ) and press on metal (POM) crowns with different core-veneer thickness. METHODS: Thirty metal and Y-TZP copings were fabricated using CAD-CAM technology with specified thickness. All copings were veneered with ceramic materials using hot pressing technique, with 2mm and 2.5mm thickness. The different coping veneer thickness of crowns resulted in six study groups, including, POM: Coping/ veneer thickness of 0.7/2mm (Gp1), 0.7/2.5mm (Gp 2) and 1mm/2mm (Gp 3)-POZ: 0.7/2mm (Gp A), 0.7/2.5mm (Gp B) and 1mm/2mm (Gp C). Crowns were cemented to a standard implant analog and failure loads (FL) and compressive stress (CS) was ascertained by controlled load application in a universal testing machine. Data was analysed using ANOVA and multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: The maximum FL were observed in the POM specimens with a C/V ratio of 1/2 (Group 3-1880.67± 256.78 N), however the lowest FL were exhibited by POZ crowns with 1/2 C/V ratio (Group C-611.89± 72.79 N). Mean FL and CS were significantly higher in POM compared to POZ crowns in respective groups. Increasing the coping-veneer thickness increased FL and CS among POM crowns. Increasing veneer and decreasing coping thickness improved FL and CS among POZ crowns. CONCLUSIONS: Press on metal specimen showed higher resistance to fracture than Press on Y-TZP specimens. Improved failure loads were observed in thin coping and thick veneers among Press on Y-TZP crowns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7674887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Professional Medical Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76748872020-11-23 Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings Vohra, Fahim Shuwaish, Mohammed Bin Deeb, Modhi Al Alhamdan, Rana Alotaibi, Naif Abduljabbar, Tariq Pak J Med Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess the failure loads and compressive stresses among bilayered press on Y-TZP (POZ) and press on metal (POM) crowns with different core-veneer thickness. METHODS: Thirty metal and Y-TZP copings were fabricated using CAD-CAM technology with specified thickness. All copings were veneered with ceramic materials using hot pressing technique, with 2mm and 2.5mm thickness. The different coping veneer thickness of crowns resulted in six study groups, including, POM: Coping/ veneer thickness of 0.7/2mm (Gp1), 0.7/2.5mm (Gp 2) and 1mm/2mm (Gp 3)-POZ: 0.7/2mm (Gp A), 0.7/2.5mm (Gp B) and 1mm/2mm (Gp C). Crowns were cemented to a standard implant analog and failure loads (FL) and compressive stress (CS) was ascertained by controlled load application in a universal testing machine. Data was analysed using ANOVA and multiple comparisons test. RESULTS: The maximum FL were observed in the POM specimens with a C/V ratio of 1/2 (Group 3-1880.67± 256.78 N), however the lowest FL were exhibited by POZ crowns with 1/2 C/V ratio (Group C-611.89± 72.79 N). Mean FL and CS were significantly higher in POM compared to POZ crowns in respective groups. Increasing the coping-veneer thickness increased FL and CS among POM crowns. Increasing veneer and decreasing coping thickness improved FL and CS among POZ crowns. CONCLUSIONS: Press on metal specimen showed higher resistance to fracture than Press on Y-TZP specimens. Improved failure loads were observed in thin coping and thick veneers among Press on Y-TZP crowns. Professional Medical Publications 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7674887/ /pubmed/33235590 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2472 Text en Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vohra, Fahim
Shuwaish, Mohammed Bin
Deeb, Modhi Al
Alhamdan, Rana
Alotaibi, Naif
Abduljabbar, Tariq
Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings
title Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings
title_full Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings
title_fullStr Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings
title_short Comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in Press on metal and Press on Y-TZP copings
title_sort comparison of failure loads and compressive stress in press on metal and press on y-tzp copings
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235590
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.7.2472
work_keys_str_mv AT vohrafahim comparisonoffailureloadsandcompressivestressinpressonmetalandpressonytzpcopings
AT shuwaishmohammedbin comparisonoffailureloadsandcompressivestressinpressonmetalandpressonytzpcopings
AT deebmodhial comparisonoffailureloadsandcompressivestressinpressonmetalandpressonytzpcopings
AT alhamdanrana comparisonoffailureloadsandcompressivestressinpressonmetalandpressonytzpcopings
AT alotaibinaif comparisonoffailureloadsandcompressivestressinpressonmetalandpressonytzpcopings
AT abduljabbartariq comparisonoffailureloadsandcompressivestressinpressonmetalandpressonytzpcopings