Cargando…
Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
BACKGROUND: Due to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001 |
_version_ | 1783611623125024768 |
---|---|
author | Grigg, Sam E. Zampiron, Andrea Akbaridoust, Farzan Chandran, Dileep Holmes, Natasha E. Johnson, Paul D.R. Marusic, Ivan Jones, Daryl |
author_facet | Grigg, Sam E. Zampiron, Andrea Akbaridoust, Farzan Chandran, Dileep Holmes, Natasha E. Johnson, Paul D.R. Marusic, Ivan Jones, Daryl |
author_sort | Grigg, Sam E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards. METHODS: Surgical mask prototypes were manufactured from two thickness grades of commercial sterilisation wrap. Safety was assessed in the context of regulatory standards. As it was not previously reported, we developed and performed differential pressure and synthetic blood penetration resistance experiments in accordance with official methodology. RESULTS: Bacterial filtration efficiency was comparable between sterilisation wrap and commercial surgical masks. Both prototypes met regulatory standards for synthetic blood resistance, whilst only our thinner mask fulfilled acceptable differential pressure (‘breathability’) thresholds. CONCLUSION: Acceptable barrier and breathability properties can be achieved with surgical masks produced from sterilisation wrap. Therefore, this may be a reasonable method to supplement stock if required. Unless there are shortages mandating alternatives, health-care workers should always use approved personal protective equipment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7674969 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76749692020-11-19 Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? Grigg, Sam E. Zampiron, Andrea Akbaridoust, Farzan Chandran, Dileep Holmes, Natasha E. Johnson, Paul D.R. Marusic, Ivan Jones, Daryl Infect Dis Health Research Paper BACKGROUND: Due to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards. METHODS: Surgical mask prototypes were manufactured from two thickness grades of commercial sterilisation wrap. Safety was assessed in the context of regulatory standards. As it was not previously reported, we developed and performed differential pressure and synthetic blood penetration resistance experiments in accordance with official methodology. RESULTS: Bacterial filtration efficiency was comparable between sterilisation wrap and commercial surgical masks. Both prototypes met regulatory standards for synthetic blood resistance, whilst only our thinner mask fulfilled acceptable differential pressure (‘breathability’) thresholds. CONCLUSION: Acceptable barrier and breathability properties can be achieved with surgical masks produced from sterilisation wrap. Therefore, this may be a reasonable method to supplement stock if required. Unless there are shortages mandating alternatives, health-care workers should always use approved personal protective equipment. Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-05 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7674969/ /pubmed/33221298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001 Text en © 2020 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Grigg, Sam E. Zampiron, Andrea Akbaridoust, Farzan Chandran, Dileep Holmes, Natasha E. Johnson, Paul D.R. Marusic, Ivan Jones, Daryl Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
title | Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
title_full | Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
title_fullStr | Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
title_short | Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
title_sort | are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674969/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griggsame aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT zampironandrea aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT akbaridoustfarzan aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT chandrandileep aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT holmesnatashae aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT johnsonpauldr aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT marusicivan aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe AT jonesdaryl aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe |