Cargando…

Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?

BACKGROUND: Due to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grigg, Sam E., Zampiron, Andrea, Akbaridoust, Farzan, Chandran, Dileep, Holmes, Natasha E., Johnson, Paul D.R., Marusic, Ivan, Jones, Daryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001
_version_ 1783611623125024768
author Grigg, Sam E.
Zampiron, Andrea
Akbaridoust, Farzan
Chandran, Dileep
Holmes, Natasha E.
Johnson, Paul D.R.
Marusic, Ivan
Jones, Daryl
author_facet Grigg, Sam E.
Zampiron, Andrea
Akbaridoust, Farzan
Chandran, Dileep
Holmes, Natasha E.
Johnson, Paul D.R.
Marusic, Ivan
Jones, Daryl
author_sort Grigg, Sam E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards. METHODS: Surgical mask prototypes were manufactured from two thickness grades of commercial sterilisation wrap. Safety was assessed in the context of regulatory standards. As it was not previously reported, we developed and performed differential pressure and synthetic blood penetration resistance experiments in accordance with official methodology. RESULTS: Bacterial filtration efficiency was comparable between sterilisation wrap and commercial surgical masks. Both prototypes met regulatory standards for synthetic blood resistance, whilst only our thinner mask fulfilled acceptable differential pressure (‘breathability’) thresholds. CONCLUSION: Acceptable barrier and breathability properties can be achieved with surgical masks produced from sterilisation wrap. Therefore, this may be a reasonable method to supplement stock if required. Unless there are shortages mandating alternatives, health-care workers should always use approved personal protective equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7674969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76749692020-11-19 Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe? Grigg, Sam E. Zampiron, Andrea Akbaridoust, Farzan Chandran, Dileep Holmes, Natasha E. Johnson, Paul D.R. Marusic, Ivan Jones, Daryl Infect Dis Health Research Paper BACKGROUND: Due to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards. METHODS: Surgical mask prototypes were manufactured from two thickness grades of commercial sterilisation wrap. Safety was assessed in the context of regulatory standards. As it was not previously reported, we developed and performed differential pressure and synthetic blood penetration resistance experiments in accordance with official methodology. RESULTS: Bacterial filtration efficiency was comparable between sterilisation wrap and commercial surgical masks. Both prototypes met regulatory standards for synthetic blood resistance, whilst only our thinner mask fulfilled acceptable differential pressure (‘breathability’) thresholds. CONCLUSION: Acceptable barrier and breathability properties can be achieved with surgical masks produced from sterilisation wrap. Therefore, this may be a reasonable method to supplement stock if required. Unless there are shortages mandating alternatives, health-care workers should always use approved personal protective equipment. Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2021-05 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7674969/ /pubmed/33221298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001 Text en © 2020 Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Grigg, Sam E.
Zampiron, Andrea
Akbaridoust, Farzan
Chandran, Dileep
Holmes, Natasha E.
Johnson, Paul D.R.
Marusic, Ivan
Jones, Daryl
Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
title Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
title_full Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
title_fullStr Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
title_full_unstemmed Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
title_short Are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
title_sort are surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7674969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221298
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT griggsame aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT zampironandrea aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT akbaridoustfarzan aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT chandrandileep aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT holmesnatashae aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT johnsonpauldr aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT marusicivan aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe
AT jonesdaryl aresurgicalmasksmanufacturedfromsterilisationwrapsafe