Cargando…
Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
BACKGROUND: Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients’ information processing and use of au...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20960436 |
_version_ | 1783611689664512000 |
---|---|
author | Yılmaz, Nida Gizem Van Weert, Julia C. M. Peters, Ellen Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Becker, Annemarie Senan, Suresh Dickhoff, Chris Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M. Damman, Olga C. |
author_facet | Yılmaz, Nida Gizem Van Weert, Julia C. M. Peters, Ellen Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Becker, Annemarie Senan, Suresh Dickhoff, Chris Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M. Damman, Olga C. |
author_sort | Yılmaz, Nida Gizem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients’ information processing and use of audiovisual and narrative information of an early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer treatment decision aid explaining surgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We further investigated differences between older and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a 2 (modality: textual v. audiovisual) × 2 (narration style: factual v. narrative) online experiment among cancer patients and survivors (N = 305; M(age) = 62.42, SD = 11.68 y). Age was included as a potential modifier: younger (<65 y) versus older (≥65 y) age. We assessed 1) perceived cognitive load, 2) satisfaction with information, 3) comprehension, 4) information recall, and 5) decisional conflict. Analysis of variance was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Irrespective of patient age, audiovisual information (compared with textual information) led to lower perceived cognitive load, higher satisfaction with information, and lower decisional conflict (subscale Effective Decision). Narrative information (compared with factual information) led to reduced decisional conflict (subscale Uncertainty) but only in younger patients. Combining audiovisual information with factual information also resulted in lower perceived cognitive load in younger patients as compared with older patients. LIMITATIONS: Patients who actually face the decision, especially older patients, might be more motivated to process our decision-aid information than the present study participants who responded to a hypothetical situation online. CONCLUSIONS: Providing participants with audiovisual information, irrespective of their age, improved their processing and use of information in a decision aid. Narratives did not clearly benefit information processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7675778 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76757782020-12-03 Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid Yılmaz, Nida Gizem Van Weert, Julia C. M. Peters, Ellen Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Becker, Annemarie Senan, Suresh Dickhoff, Chris Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M. Damman, Olga C. Med Decis Making Original Articles BACKGROUND: Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients’ information processing and use of audiovisual and narrative information of an early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer treatment decision aid explaining surgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We further investigated differences between older and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a 2 (modality: textual v. audiovisual) × 2 (narration style: factual v. narrative) online experiment among cancer patients and survivors (N = 305; M(age) = 62.42, SD = 11.68 y). Age was included as a potential modifier: younger (<65 y) versus older (≥65 y) age. We assessed 1) perceived cognitive load, 2) satisfaction with information, 3) comprehension, 4) information recall, and 5) decisional conflict. Analysis of variance was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Irrespective of patient age, audiovisual information (compared with textual information) led to lower perceived cognitive load, higher satisfaction with information, and lower decisional conflict (subscale Effective Decision). Narrative information (compared with factual information) led to reduced decisional conflict (subscale Uncertainty) but only in younger patients. Combining audiovisual information with factual information also resulted in lower perceived cognitive load in younger patients as compared with older patients. LIMITATIONS: Patients who actually face the decision, especially older patients, might be more motivated to process our decision-aid information than the present study participants who responded to a hypothetical situation online. CONCLUSIONS: Providing participants with audiovisual information, irrespective of their age, improved their processing and use of information in a decision aid. Narratives did not clearly benefit information processing. SAGE Publications 2020-10-20 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7675778/ /pubmed/33078684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20960436 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Yılmaz, Nida Gizem Van Weert, Julia C. M. Peters, Ellen Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Becker, Annemarie Senan, Suresh Dickhoff, Chris Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M. Damman, Olga C. Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid |
title | Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid |
title_full | Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid |
title_fullStr | Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid |
title_short | Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid |
title_sort | testing the effects of modality and narration style on patients’ information use in a lung cancer treatment decision aid |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675778/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20960436 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yılmaznidagizem testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT vanweertjuliacm testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT petersellen testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT lissenbergwittebirgiti testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT beckerannemarie testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT senansuresh testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT dickhoffchris testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT timmermansdaniellerm testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid AT dammanolgac testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid |