Cargando…

Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid

BACKGROUND: Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients’ information processing and use of au...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yılmaz, Nida Gizem, Van Weert, Julia C. M., Peters, Ellen, Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I., Becker, Annemarie, Senan, Suresh, Dickhoff, Chris, Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M., Damman, Olga C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20960436
_version_ 1783611689664512000
author Yılmaz, Nida Gizem
Van Weert, Julia C. M.
Peters, Ellen
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Becker, Annemarie
Senan, Suresh
Dickhoff, Chris
Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M.
Damman, Olga C.
author_facet Yılmaz, Nida Gizem
Van Weert, Julia C. M.
Peters, Ellen
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Becker, Annemarie
Senan, Suresh
Dickhoff, Chris
Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M.
Damman, Olga C.
author_sort Yılmaz, Nida Gizem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients’ information processing and use of audiovisual and narrative information of an early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer treatment decision aid explaining surgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We further investigated differences between older and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a 2 (modality: textual v. audiovisual) × 2 (narration style: factual v. narrative) online experiment among cancer patients and survivors (N = 305; M(age) = 62.42, SD = 11.68 y). Age was included as a potential modifier: younger (<65 y) versus older (≥65 y) age. We assessed 1) perceived cognitive load, 2) satisfaction with information, 3) comprehension, 4) information recall, and 5) decisional conflict. Analysis of variance was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Irrespective of patient age, audiovisual information (compared with textual information) led to lower perceived cognitive load, higher satisfaction with information, and lower decisional conflict (subscale Effective Decision). Narrative information (compared with factual information) led to reduced decisional conflict (subscale Uncertainty) but only in younger patients. Combining audiovisual information with factual information also resulted in lower perceived cognitive load in younger patients as compared with older patients. LIMITATIONS: Patients who actually face the decision, especially older patients, might be more motivated to process our decision-aid information than the present study participants who responded to a hypothetical situation online. CONCLUSIONS: Providing participants with audiovisual information, irrespective of their age, improved their processing and use of information in a decision aid. Narratives did not clearly benefit information processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7675778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76757782020-12-03 Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid Yılmaz, Nida Gizem Van Weert, Julia C. M. Peters, Ellen Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I. Becker, Annemarie Senan, Suresh Dickhoff, Chris Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M. Damman, Olga C. Med Decis Making Original Articles BACKGROUND: Risk information in patient decision aids (PDAs) is often difficult for older patients to process. Providing audiovisual and narrative information may enhance the understanding and use of health-related information. We studied the effects on patients’ information processing and use of audiovisual and narrative information of an early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer treatment decision aid explaining surgery and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. We further investigated differences between older and younger patients. METHODS: We conducted a 2 (modality: textual v. audiovisual) × 2 (narration style: factual v. narrative) online experiment among cancer patients and survivors (N = 305; M(age) = 62.42, SD = 11.68 y). Age was included as a potential modifier: younger (<65 y) versus older (≥65 y) age. We assessed 1) perceived cognitive load, 2) satisfaction with information, 3) comprehension, 4) information recall, and 5) decisional conflict. Analysis of variance was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Irrespective of patient age, audiovisual information (compared with textual information) led to lower perceived cognitive load, higher satisfaction with information, and lower decisional conflict (subscale Effective Decision). Narrative information (compared with factual information) led to reduced decisional conflict (subscale Uncertainty) but only in younger patients. Combining audiovisual information with factual information also resulted in lower perceived cognitive load in younger patients as compared with older patients. LIMITATIONS: Patients who actually face the decision, especially older patients, might be more motivated to process our decision-aid information than the present study participants who responded to a hypothetical situation online. CONCLUSIONS: Providing participants with audiovisual information, irrespective of their age, improved their processing and use of information in a decision aid. Narratives did not clearly benefit information processing. SAGE Publications 2020-10-20 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7675778/ /pubmed/33078684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20960436 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yılmaz, Nida Gizem
Van Weert, Julia C. M.
Peters, Ellen
Lissenberg-Witte, Birgit I.
Becker, Annemarie
Senan, Suresh
Dickhoff, Chris
Timmermans, Daniëlle R. M.
Damman, Olga C.
Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
title Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
title_full Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
title_fullStr Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
title_full_unstemmed Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
title_short Testing the Effects of Modality and Narration Style on Patients’ Information Use in a Lung Cancer Treatment Decision Aid
title_sort testing the effects of modality and narration style on patients’ information use in a lung cancer treatment decision aid
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33078684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X20960436
work_keys_str_mv AT yılmaznidagizem testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT vanweertjuliacm testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT petersellen testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT lissenbergwittebirgiti testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT beckerannemarie testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT senansuresh testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT dickhoffchris testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT timmermansdaniellerm testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid
AT dammanolgac testingtheeffectsofmodalityandnarrationstyleonpatientsinformationuseinalungcancertreatmentdecisionaid