Cargando…

Randomized controlled study on the effects of triple therapy including vonoprazan or rabeprazole for the second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Inhibition of gastric acid secretion is important for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Vonoprazan (VPZ) is a strong, long-lasting inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. Studies that examined the effectiveness of VPZ-based triple therapy in second-line treatment have been performed....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hojo, Mariko, Asaoka, Daisuke, Takeda, Tsutomu, Shimada, Yuji, Matsumoto, Kenshi, Matsumoto, Kohei, Yatagai, Noboru, Akazawa, Yoichi, Ueda, Kumiko, Ueyama, Hiroya, Nagahara, Akihito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756284820966247
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND AIM: Inhibition of gastric acid secretion is important for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. Vonoprazan (VPZ) is a strong, long-lasting inhibitor of gastric acid secretion. Studies that examined the effectiveness of VPZ-based triple therapy in second-line treatment have been performed. However, there have been no randomized controlled studies to compare the effect between VPZ-based triple therapy and proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy in second-line treatment, and it is not known which is more effective between VPZ-based and PPI-based therapies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of second-line triple therapies including VPZ or rabeprazole (RPZ) as the PPI. METHODS: Eligible patients with H. pylori infection who failed first-line triple therapy were assigned randomly to the VPZ [VPZ40 mg/day, amoxicillin (AMPC) 1500 mg/day, metronidazole (MNZ) 500 mg/day] or RPZ (RPZ20 mg/day, AMPC1500 mg/day, MNZ500 mg/day) group. A (13)C-urea breath test result of less than 2.5% was considered as successful eradication. RESULTS: In total, 46 and 41 patients were analyzed as intention to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP), respectively. Eradication rates in the VPZ and RPZ groups were 73.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.6–89.8%] and 82.6% (95% CI 61.2–95.0%) based on ITT analysis, respectively (p = 0.72). Based on PP analysis, the eradication rates in the VPZ and RPZ groups were 89.5% (95% CI 66.9–98.7%) and 86.4% (95% CI 65.1–97.1%), respectively (p = 1.00). Two patients in the VPZ group and one in the RPZ group discontinued treatment due to side effects (p = 1.00). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between second-line therapies including VPZ or RPZ.