Cargando…
Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia
BACKGROUND: Macroprolactin mostly composed of an immunoglobulin G (IgG) and a monomeric prolactin (PRL) represents the major circulating PRL form in the patients with macroprolactinemia that are usually asymptomatic and may not require treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32597541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23456 |
_version_ | 1783611724179439616 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Chao Fan, Fei Hu, Siqi Meng, Lingxin Xu, Dong Wang, Juan Chen, Lu Liu, Jingrui Dong, Ying Lu, Yifan Shen, Min Zhai, Yanhong Cao, Zheng |
author_facet | Yu, Chao Fan, Fei Hu, Siqi Meng, Lingxin Xu, Dong Wang, Juan Chen, Lu Liu, Jingrui Dong, Ying Lu, Yifan Shen, Min Zhai, Yanhong Cao, Zheng |
author_sort | Yu, Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Macroprolactin mostly composed of an immunoglobulin G (IgG) and a monomeric prolactin (PRL) represents the major circulating PRL form in the patients with macroprolactinemia that are usually asymptomatic and may not require treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of antithyroid and antinuclear antibodies, as well as the IgG subclass distributions in the patients suspected for macroprolactinemia. METHODS: From January to July in 2018, totally 317 patients with elevated PRL were subjected to the polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation assay. The patients with recovery rates of ≤60% were subjected for IgG subclass determination and autoantibody testing including thyroid peroxidase antibody (aTPO), antithyroglobulin antibody (aTG), and antinuclear antibodies (ANA). RESULTS: The higher the post‐PEG PRL recovery rates, the less typical hyperprolactinemia symptoms and the higher prevalence of autoantibodies were observed. The IgG1 and IgG3 were the predominant subclasses in the PRL‐IgG complexes according to the immunoprecipitation experiments. CONCLUSION: The patients with post‐PEG PRL recovery rates of <40% and 40%‐60% were likely to represent two distinct populations of different clinical presentations. The prevalence of autoantibodies and IgG subclasses distribution suggested their pathogenic significance in the development of macroprolactinemia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7676205 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76762052020-11-24 Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia Yu, Chao Fan, Fei Hu, Siqi Meng, Lingxin Xu, Dong Wang, Juan Chen, Lu Liu, Jingrui Dong, Ying Lu, Yifan Shen, Min Zhai, Yanhong Cao, Zheng J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Macroprolactin mostly composed of an immunoglobulin G (IgG) and a monomeric prolactin (PRL) represents the major circulating PRL form in the patients with macroprolactinemia that are usually asymptomatic and may not require treatment. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of antithyroid and antinuclear antibodies, as well as the IgG subclass distributions in the patients suspected for macroprolactinemia. METHODS: From January to July in 2018, totally 317 patients with elevated PRL were subjected to the polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation assay. The patients with recovery rates of ≤60% were subjected for IgG subclass determination and autoantibody testing including thyroid peroxidase antibody (aTPO), antithyroglobulin antibody (aTG), and antinuclear antibodies (ANA). RESULTS: The higher the post‐PEG PRL recovery rates, the less typical hyperprolactinemia symptoms and the higher prevalence of autoantibodies were observed. The IgG1 and IgG3 were the predominant subclasses in the PRL‐IgG complexes according to the immunoprecipitation experiments. CONCLUSION: The patients with post‐PEG PRL recovery rates of <40% and 40%‐60% were likely to represent two distinct populations of different clinical presentations. The prevalence of autoantibodies and IgG subclasses distribution suggested their pathogenic significance in the development of macroprolactinemia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7676205/ /pubmed/32597541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23456 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Yu, Chao Fan, Fei Hu, Siqi Meng, Lingxin Xu, Dong Wang, Juan Chen, Lu Liu, Jingrui Dong, Ying Lu, Yifan Shen, Min Zhai, Yanhong Cao, Zheng Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
title | Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
title_full | Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
title_short | Evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin G subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
title_sort | evaluation of autoantibodies and immunoglobulin g subclasses in women with suspected macroprolactinemia |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676205/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32597541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuchao evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT fanfei evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT husiqi evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT menglingxin evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT xudong evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT wangjuan evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT chenlu evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT liujingrui evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT dongying evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT luyifan evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT shenmin evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT zhaiyanhong evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia AT caozheng evaluationofautoantibodiesandimmunoglobulingsubclassesinwomenwithsuspectedmacroprolactinemia |