Cargando…
Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes
BACKGROUND: Accurately predicting patient outcomes in Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could aid patient management and allocation of healthcare resources. There are a variety of methods which can be used to develop prognostic models, ranging from logistic regression and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01316-6 |
_version_ | 1783611766258794496 |
---|---|
author | Abdulaal, Ahmed Patel, Aatish Charani, Esmita Denny, Sarah Alqahtani, Saleh A. Davies, Gary W. Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke S. P. |
author_facet | Abdulaal, Ahmed Patel, Aatish Charani, Esmita Denny, Sarah Alqahtani, Saleh A. Davies, Gary W. Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke S. P. |
author_sort | Abdulaal, Ahmed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Accurately predicting patient outcomes in Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could aid patient management and allocation of healthcare resources. There are a variety of methods which can be used to develop prognostic models, ranging from logistic regression and survival analysis to more complex machine learning algorithms and deep learning. Despite several models having been created for SARS-CoV-2, most of these have been found to be highly susceptible to bias. We aimed to develop and compare two separate predictive models for death during admission with SARS-CoV-2. METHOD: Between March 1 and April 24, 2020, 398 patients were identified with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in a London teaching hospital. Data from electronic health records were extracted and used to create two predictive models using: (1) a Cox regression model and (2) an artificial neural network (ANN). Model performance profiles were assessed by validation, discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS: Both the Cox regression and ANN models achieved high accuracy (83.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 73.8–91.1 and 90.0%, 95% CI 81.2–95.6, respectively). The area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) for the ANN (92.6%, 95% CI 91.1–94.1) was significantly greater than that of the Cox regression model (86.9%, 95% CI 85.7–88.2), p = 0.0136. Both models achieved acceptable calibration with Brier scores of 0.13 and 0.11 for the Cox model and ANN, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate an ANN which is non-inferior to a Cox regression model but with potential for further development such that it can learn as new data becomes available. Deep learning techniques are particularly suited to complex datasets with non-linear solutions, which make them appropriate for use in conditions with a paucity of prior knowledge. Accurate prognostic models for SARS-CoV-2 can provide benefits at the patient, departmental and organisational level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7676403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76764032020-11-19 Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes Abdulaal, Ahmed Patel, Aatish Charani, Esmita Denny, Sarah Alqahtani, Saleh A. Davies, Gary W. Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke S. P. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Accurately predicting patient outcomes in Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) could aid patient management and allocation of healthcare resources. There are a variety of methods which can be used to develop prognostic models, ranging from logistic regression and survival analysis to more complex machine learning algorithms and deep learning. Despite several models having been created for SARS-CoV-2, most of these have been found to be highly susceptible to bias. We aimed to develop and compare two separate predictive models for death during admission with SARS-CoV-2. METHOD: Between March 1 and April 24, 2020, 398 patients were identified with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 in a London teaching hospital. Data from electronic health records were extracted and used to create two predictive models using: (1) a Cox regression model and (2) an artificial neural network (ANN). Model performance profiles were assessed by validation, discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS: Both the Cox regression and ANN models achieved high accuracy (83.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 73.8–91.1 and 90.0%, 95% CI 81.2–95.6, respectively). The area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC) for the ANN (92.6%, 95% CI 91.1–94.1) was significantly greater than that of the Cox regression model (86.9%, 95% CI 85.7–88.2), p = 0.0136. Both models achieved acceptable calibration with Brier scores of 0.13 and 0.11 for the Cox model and ANN, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate an ANN which is non-inferior to a Cox regression model but with potential for further development such that it can learn as new data becomes available. Deep learning techniques are particularly suited to complex datasets with non-linear solutions, which make them appropriate for use in conditions with a paucity of prior knowledge. Accurate prognostic models for SARS-CoV-2 can provide benefits at the patient, departmental and organisational level. BioMed Central 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7676403/ /pubmed/33213435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01316-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abdulaal, Ahmed Patel, Aatish Charani, Esmita Denny, Sarah Alqahtani, Saleh A. Davies, Gary W. Mughal, Nabeela Moore, Luke S. P. Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes |
title | Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes |
title_full | Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes |
title_short | Comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for SARS-CoV-2 outcomes |
title_sort | comparison of deep learning with regression analysis in creating predictive models for sars-cov-2 outcomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01316-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdulaalahmed comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT patelaatish comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT charaniesmita comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT dennysarah comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT alqahtanisaleha comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT daviesgaryw comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT mughalnabeela comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes AT moorelukesp comparisonofdeeplearningwithregressionanalysisincreatingpredictivemodelsforsarscov2outcomes |