Cargando…

The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review

Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed using implants or expanders. Adjunctive materials such as acellular dermal matrix and synthetic meshes are used to support the implant or expander. A paucity of large studies exist on the use of synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faulkner, Heather R., Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren, McLeod, Matthew, Wright, Eric, Hulsen, John, Austen, William G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007384
_version_ 1783611777310785536
author Faulkner, Heather R.
Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren
McLeod, Matthew
Wright, Eric
Hulsen, John
Austen, William G.
author_facet Faulkner, Heather R.
Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren
McLeod, Matthew
Wright, Eric
Hulsen, John
Austen, William G.
author_sort Faulkner, Heather R.
collection PubMed
description Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed using implants or expanders. Adjunctive materials such as acellular dermal matrix and synthetic meshes are used to support the implant or expander. A paucity of large studies exist on the use of synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients over the past 7 years who had implant reconstruction with synthetic absorbable mesh at the Massachusetts General Hospital was performed. Data were collected on demographic and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (376 mastectomies) were treated with direct-to-implant subpectoral reconstruction with absorbable mesh from 2011 to 2017. The infection rate was 2.1 percent. The rate of capsular contracture was 4.8 percent. Patients who had radiation therapy either preoperatively or postoperatively had a higher rate of complications, including capsular contracture. Cost savings for using mesh instead of acellular dermal matrix surpassed $1.2 million. CONCLUSION: Synthetic absorbable mesh is a safe alternative to acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction and provides stable results along with significant cost savings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7676463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76764632020-11-23 The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review Faulkner, Heather R. Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren McLeod, Matthew Wright, Eric Hulsen, John Austen, William G. Plast Reconstr Surg Breast: Original Articles Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed using implants or expanders. Adjunctive materials such as acellular dermal matrix and synthetic meshes are used to support the implant or expander. A paucity of large studies exist on the use of synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients over the past 7 years who had implant reconstruction with synthetic absorbable mesh at the Massachusetts General Hospital was performed. Data were collected on demographic and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (376 mastectomies) were treated with direct-to-implant subpectoral reconstruction with absorbable mesh from 2011 to 2017. The infection rate was 2.1 percent. The rate of capsular contracture was 4.8 percent. Patients who had radiation therapy either preoperatively or postoperatively had a higher rate of complications, including capsular contracture. Cost savings for using mesh instead of acellular dermal matrix surpassed $1.2 million. CONCLUSION: Synthetic absorbable mesh is a safe alternative to acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction and provides stable results along with significant cost savings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-20 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7676463/ /pubmed/33234950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007384 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Breast: Original Articles
Faulkner, Heather R.
Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren
McLeod, Matthew
Wright, Eric
Hulsen, John
Austen, William G.
The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
title The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
title_full The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
title_fullStr The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
title_short The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
title_sort use of absorbable mesh in implant-based breast reconstruction: a 7-year review
topic Breast: Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007384
work_keys_str_mv AT faulknerheatherr theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT shikowitzbehrlauren theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT mcleodmatthew theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT wrighteric theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT hulsenjohn theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT austenwilliamg theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT faulknerheatherr useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT shikowitzbehrlauren useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT mcleodmatthew useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT wrighteric useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT hulsenjohn useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview
AT austenwilliamg useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview