Cargando…
The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review
Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed using implants or expanders. Adjunctive materials such as acellular dermal matrix and synthetic meshes are used to support the implant or expander. A paucity of large studies exist on the use of synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007384 |
_version_ | 1783611777310785536 |
---|---|
author | Faulkner, Heather R. Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren McLeod, Matthew Wright, Eric Hulsen, John Austen, William G. |
author_facet | Faulkner, Heather R. Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren McLeod, Matthew Wright, Eric Hulsen, John Austen, William G. |
author_sort | Faulkner, Heather R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed using implants or expanders. Adjunctive materials such as acellular dermal matrix and synthetic meshes are used to support the implant or expander. A paucity of large studies exist on the use of synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients over the past 7 years who had implant reconstruction with synthetic absorbable mesh at the Massachusetts General Hospital was performed. Data were collected on demographic and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (376 mastectomies) were treated with direct-to-implant subpectoral reconstruction with absorbable mesh from 2011 to 2017. The infection rate was 2.1 percent. The rate of capsular contracture was 4.8 percent. Patients who had radiation therapy either preoperatively or postoperatively had a higher rate of complications, including capsular contracture. Cost savings for using mesh instead of acellular dermal matrix surpassed $1.2 million. CONCLUSION: Synthetic absorbable mesh is a safe alternative to acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction and provides stable results along with significant cost savings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7676463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76764632020-11-23 The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review Faulkner, Heather R. Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren McLeod, Matthew Wright, Eric Hulsen, John Austen, William G. Plast Reconstr Surg Breast: Original Articles Breast reconstruction is most frequently performed using implants or expanders. Adjunctive materials such as acellular dermal matrix and synthetic meshes are used to support the implant or expander. A paucity of large studies exist on the use of synthetic mesh for breast reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients over the past 7 years who had implant reconstruction with synthetic absorbable mesh at the Massachusetts General Hospital was performed. Data were collected on demographic and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients (376 mastectomies) were treated with direct-to-implant subpectoral reconstruction with absorbable mesh from 2011 to 2017. The infection rate was 2.1 percent. The rate of capsular contracture was 4.8 percent. Patients who had radiation therapy either preoperatively or postoperatively had a higher rate of complications, including capsular contracture. Cost savings for using mesh instead of acellular dermal matrix surpassed $1.2 million. CONCLUSION: Synthetic absorbable mesh is a safe alternative to acellular dermal matrix in prosthetic breast reconstruction and provides stable results along with significant cost savings. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-20 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7676463/ /pubmed/33234950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007384 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Breast: Original Articles Faulkner, Heather R. Shikowitz-Behr, Lauren McLeod, Matthew Wright, Eric Hulsen, John Austen, William G. The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review |
title | The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review |
title_full | The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review |
title_fullStr | The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review |
title_short | The Use of Absorbable Mesh in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A 7-Year Review |
title_sort | use of absorbable mesh in implant-based breast reconstruction: a 7-year review |
topic | Breast: Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33234950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT faulknerheatherr theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT shikowitzbehrlauren theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT mcleodmatthew theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT wrighteric theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT hulsenjohn theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT austenwilliamg theuseofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT faulknerheatherr useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT shikowitzbehrlauren useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT mcleodmatthew useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT wrighteric useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT hulsenjohn useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview AT austenwilliamg useofabsorbablemeshinimplantbasedbreastreconstructiona7yearreview |