Cargando…

Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers

Digital tourniquets are widely used for the management of digital injuries in emergency departments or outpatient clinics. This study is focused on the pressure analysis of digital tourniquets on some points not covered in the existing literature. A total of thirty volunteers were enrolled in this s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyeonwoo, Joo, Yoon Ha, Yu, Na Hee, Kwon, Sung Tack, Lee, Jung Chan, Kim, Byung Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33217821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023149
_version_ 1783611800393089024
author Kim, Hyeonwoo
Joo, Yoon Ha
Yu, Na Hee
Kwon, Sung Tack
Lee, Jung Chan
Kim, Byung Jun
author_facet Kim, Hyeonwoo
Joo, Yoon Ha
Yu, Na Hee
Kwon, Sung Tack
Lee, Jung Chan
Kim, Byung Jun
author_sort Kim, Hyeonwoo
collection PubMed
description Digital tourniquets are widely used for the management of digital injuries in emergency departments or outpatient clinics. This study is focused on the pressure analysis of digital tourniquets on some points not covered in the existing literature. A total of thirty volunteers were enrolled in this study. Instantaneous surface pressure was measured at the thumbs, index fingers, and little fingers. We investigated the pressure according to the circumference of digits, tourniquet types, and measurement sites (dorsal and mid lateral volar sides) above the digital vessels. Continuous pressure was measured in artificial silicone models to determine the change of pressure over 2 hours. The average pressure measured on the mid lateral volar side of volunteers fingers were 154.3 ± 54.9 mm Hg by T-Ring(TM) and 162.6 ± 61.0 mm Hg by surgical glove. The pressure on the dorsal side were 224.7 ± 57.7 mm Hg by T-Ring(TM) and 228.8 ± 66.0 mm Hg by surgical glove, each significantly higher than the mid lateral volar side. The circumference of digits did not significantly affect the surface pressure. The pressure pattern did not change significantly over 2 hours in both tourniquet types. The surface pressure of the mid lateral volar side was significantly lower than that of the dorsal side. However, there was no significant pressure difference according to the circumference of digits. Time dependent pressure change were not significantly different between 2 tourniquets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7676577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76765772020-11-24 Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers Kim, Hyeonwoo Joo, Yoon Ha Yu, Na Hee Kwon, Sung Tack Lee, Jung Chan Kim, Byung Jun Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 Digital tourniquets are widely used for the management of digital injuries in emergency departments or outpatient clinics. This study is focused on the pressure analysis of digital tourniquets on some points not covered in the existing literature. A total of thirty volunteers were enrolled in this study. Instantaneous surface pressure was measured at the thumbs, index fingers, and little fingers. We investigated the pressure according to the circumference of digits, tourniquet types, and measurement sites (dorsal and mid lateral volar sides) above the digital vessels. Continuous pressure was measured in artificial silicone models to determine the change of pressure over 2 hours. The average pressure measured on the mid lateral volar side of volunteers fingers were 154.3 ± 54.9 mm Hg by T-Ring(TM) and 162.6 ± 61.0 mm Hg by surgical glove. The pressure on the dorsal side were 224.7 ± 57.7 mm Hg by T-Ring(TM) and 228.8 ± 66.0 mm Hg by surgical glove, each significantly higher than the mid lateral volar side. The circumference of digits did not significantly affect the surface pressure. The pressure pattern did not change significantly over 2 hours in both tourniquet types. The surface pressure of the mid lateral volar side was significantly lower than that of the dorsal side. However, there was no significant pressure difference according to the circumference of digits. Time dependent pressure change were not significantly different between 2 tourniquets. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7676577/ /pubmed/33217821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023149 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 7100
Kim, Hyeonwoo
Joo, Yoon Ha
Yu, Na Hee
Kwon, Sung Tack
Lee, Jung Chan
Kim, Byung Jun
Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
title Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
title_full Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
title_fullStr Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
title_short Validation of digital tourniquet pressures: An experimental comparison of T-Ring(TM) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
title_sort validation of digital tourniquet pressures: an experimental comparison of t-ring(tm) and conventional surgical glove in human volunteers
topic 7100
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33217821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023149
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyeonwoo validationofdigitaltourniquetpressuresanexperimentalcomparisonoftringtmandconventionalsurgicalgloveinhumanvolunteers
AT jooyoonha validationofdigitaltourniquetpressuresanexperimentalcomparisonoftringtmandconventionalsurgicalgloveinhumanvolunteers
AT yunahee validationofdigitaltourniquetpressuresanexperimentalcomparisonoftringtmandconventionalsurgicalgloveinhumanvolunteers
AT kwonsungtack validationofdigitaltourniquetpressuresanexperimentalcomparisonoftringtmandconventionalsurgicalgloveinhumanvolunteers
AT leejungchan validationofdigitaltourniquetpressuresanexperimentalcomparisonoftringtmandconventionalsurgicalgloveinhumanvolunteers
AT kimbyungjun validationofdigitaltourniquetpressuresanexperimentalcomparisonoftringtmandconventionalsurgicalgloveinhumanvolunteers