Cargando…

Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre

INTRODUCTION: Public health surveillance together with good sanitary decisions is essential for the proper management of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Colombian departments based on the quality of the data and to build the national ranking. MATERIALS AND METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurtado-Ortiz, Alexandra, Moreno-Montoya, José, Prieto-Alvarado, Franklyn E., Idrovo, Álvaro J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Nacional de Salud 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152196
http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5812
_version_ 1783611853783433216
author Hurtado-Ortiz, Alexandra
Moreno-Montoya, José
Prieto-Alvarado, Franklyn E.
Idrovo, Álvaro J.
author_facet Hurtado-Ortiz, Alexandra
Moreno-Montoya, José
Prieto-Alvarado, Franklyn E.
Idrovo, Álvaro J.
author_sort Hurtado-Ortiz, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Public health surveillance together with good sanitary decisions is essential for the proper management of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Colombian departments based on the quality of the data and to build the national ranking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the accumulated cases published between March 6 and September 1, 2020, by the Instituto Nacional de Salud. To achieve comparability, the analyses considered the day the first case was diagnosed as the first analysis date for each department. The fulfillment of Benford's law was assessed with p-values in the log-likelihood ratio or chi-square tests. The analysis was completed with the lethality observed in each department and then the performance ranking was established. RESULTS: Bogotá and Valle del Cauca had optimal public health surveillance performance all along. The data suggest that Antioquia, Nariño, and Tolima had good containment and adequate public health surveillance after the economic opening beginning on June 1, 2020. CONCLUSION: We obtained the ranking of the departments regarding the quality of public health surveillance data. The best five departments can be case studies to identify the elements associated with good performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7676826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Instituto Nacional de Salud
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76768262020-11-20 Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre Hurtado-Ortiz, Alexandra Moreno-Montoya, José Prieto-Alvarado, Franklyn E. Idrovo, Álvaro J. Biomedica Artículo Original INTRODUCTION: Public health surveillance together with good sanitary decisions is essential for the proper management of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of Colombian departments based on the quality of the data and to build the national ranking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the accumulated cases published between March 6 and September 1, 2020, by the Instituto Nacional de Salud. To achieve comparability, the analyses considered the day the first case was diagnosed as the first analysis date for each department. The fulfillment of Benford's law was assessed with p-values in the log-likelihood ratio or chi-square tests. The analysis was completed with the lethality observed in each department and then the performance ranking was established. RESULTS: Bogotá and Valle del Cauca had optimal public health surveillance performance all along. The data suggest that Antioquia, Nariño, and Tolima had good containment and adequate public health surveillance after the economic opening beginning on June 1, 2020. CONCLUSION: We obtained the ranking of the departments regarding the quality of public health surveillance data. The best five departments can be case studies to identify the elements associated with good performance. Instituto Nacional de Salud 2020-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7676826/ /pubmed/33152196 http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5812 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons
spellingShingle Artículo Original
Hurtado-Ortiz, Alexandra
Moreno-Montoya, José
Prieto-Alvarado, Franklyn E.
Idrovo, Álvaro J.
Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre
title Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre
title_full Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre
title_fullStr Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre
title_full_unstemmed Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre
title_short Evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de COVID-19 en Colombia: primer semestre
title_sort evaluación comparativa de la vigilancia en salud pública de covid-19 en colombia: primer semestre
topic Artículo Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33152196
http://dx.doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.5812
work_keys_str_mv AT hurtadoortizalexandra evaluacioncomparativadelavigilanciaensaludpublicadecovid19encolombiaprimersemestre
AT morenomontoyajose evaluacioncomparativadelavigilanciaensaludpublicadecovid19encolombiaprimersemestre
AT prietoalvaradofranklyne evaluacioncomparativadelavigilanciaensaludpublicadecovid19encolombiaprimersemestre
AT idrovoalvaroj evaluacioncomparativadelavigilanciaensaludpublicadecovid19encolombiaprimersemestre