Cargando…
The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the kinematics and kinetics of sprint running and countermovement jump performance between the ages of 8–9, and 11–12 years old boys in order to understand the developmental plateau in performance. METHODS: 18 physically active boys (Age: 10.1 ± 1.6),...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.547075 |
_version_ | 1783611867073085440 |
---|---|
author | Wdowski, Maximilian M. Noon, Mark Mundy, Peter D. Gittoes, Marianne J. R. Duncan, Michael J. |
author_facet | Wdowski, Maximilian M. Noon, Mark Mundy, Peter D. Gittoes, Marianne J. R. Duncan, Michael J. |
author_sort | Wdowski, Maximilian M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the kinematics and kinetics of sprint running and countermovement jump performance between the ages of 8–9, and 11–12 years old boys in order to understand the developmental plateau in performance. METHODS: 18 physically active boys (Age: 10.1 ± 1.6), in an under 9 years old (U9) and an under 12 years old (U12) group performed 15 m sprints and countermovement jumps. A 3D motion analysis system (200 Hz), synchronized with four force platforms (1,000 Hz), was used to collect kinematic and kinetic data during the first stance phase of the sprint run and the countermovement jump. RESULTS: The U12 group had a significantly greater height (U9: 1.364 ± 0.064 m; U12: 1.548 ± 0.046 mm), larger mass (U9: 30.9 ± 3.5 kg; U12: 43.9 ± 5.0 kg), superior sprint performance over 0–5 m (U9: 1.31 ± 0.007 s; U12: 1.23 ± 0.009 s) and 0–15 m (U9: 3.20 ± 0.17 s; U12: 3.01 ± 0.20 s), and increased jump height (U9: 0.17 ± 0.06 m; U12: 0.24 ± 0.10 m) than the under nine group. During the first stance phase of the sprint the U12 group had a significantly greater vertical (U9: 0.22 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.25 ± 0.03 BW.s) and horizontal impulse (U9: 0.07 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.09 ± 0.03 BW.s) than the U9 group. When performing a countermovement jump the U12 group had a significantly greater mean average eccentric force (U9: 407.3 ± 55.0 N; U12: 542.2 ± 65.1 N) and mean average concentric force (U9: 495.8 ± 41.3 N; U12: 684.0 ± 62.1 N). Joint kinematics for the countermovement jump were significantly different between age groups for the ankle range of motion (U9: 80.6 ± 17.4°; U12: 64.1 ± 9°) and knee minimum joint angle (U9: −5.7 ± 3.9°; U12: 0.0 ± 4.4°). Conclusion: The study demonstrates for the first time that the development of physically active boys between the ages of 8–9 to 11–12 years increased the ground reaction forces and impulses during sprint running and countermovement jumps, but that sprint running technique had not developed during this period. Furthermore, countermovement jump technique was still emerging at the age of 8–9 years old. Practitioners need to implement on-going fine-grained sprint running and CMJ technique sessions to ensure that the increased force producing capabilities that come with age are appropriately utilized. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7676893 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76768932020-11-27 The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys Wdowski, Maximilian M. Noon, Mark Mundy, Peter D. Gittoes, Marianne J. R. Duncan, Michael J. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the kinematics and kinetics of sprint running and countermovement jump performance between the ages of 8–9, and 11–12 years old boys in order to understand the developmental plateau in performance. METHODS: 18 physically active boys (Age: 10.1 ± 1.6), in an under 9 years old (U9) and an under 12 years old (U12) group performed 15 m sprints and countermovement jumps. A 3D motion analysis system (200 Hz), synchronized with four force platforms (1,000 Hz), was used to collect kinematic and kinetic data during the first stance phase of the sprint run and the countermovement jump. RESULTS: The U12 group had a significantly greater height (U9: 1.364 ± 0.064 m; U12: 1.548 ± 0.046 mm), larger mass (U9: 30.9 ± 3.5 kg; U12: 43.9 ± 5.0 kg), superior sprint performance over 0–5 m (U9: 1.31 ± 0.007 s; U12: 1.23 ± 0.009 s) and 0–15 m (U9: 3.20 ± 0.17 s; U12: 3.01 ± 0.20 s), and increased jump height (U9: 0.17 ± 0.06 m; U12: 0.24 ± 0.10 m) than the under nine group. During the first stance phase of the sprint the U12 group had a significantly greater vertical (U9: 0.22 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.25 ± 0.03 BW.s) and horizontal impulse (U9: 0.07 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.09 ± 0.03 BW.s) than the U9 group. When performing a countermovement jump the U12 group had a significantly greater mean average eccentric force (U9: 407.3 ± 55.0 N; U12: 542.2 ± 65.1 N) and mean average concentric force (U9: 495.8 ± 41.3 N; U12: 684.0 ± 62.1 N). Joint kinematics for the countermovement jump were significantly different between age groups for the ankle range of motion (U9: 80.6 ± 17.4°; U12: 64.1 ± 9°) and knee minimum joint angle (U9: −5.7 ± 3.9°; U12: 0.0 ± 4.4°). Conclusion: The study demonstrates for the first time that the development of physically active boys between the ages of 8–9 to 11–12 years increased the ground reaction forces and impulses during sprint running and countermovement jumps, but that sprint running technique had not developed during this period. Furthermore, countermovement jump technique was still emerging at the age of 8–9 years old. Practitioners need to implement on-going fine-grained sprint running and CMJ technique sessions to ensure that the increased force producing capabilities that come with age are appropriately utilized. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7676893/ /pubmed/33251191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.547075 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wdowski, Noon, Mundy, Gittoes and Duncan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Wdowski, Maximilian M. Noon, Mark Mundy, Peter D. Gittoes, Marianne J. R. Duncan, Michael J. The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys |
title | The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys |
title_full | The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys |
title_fullStr | The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys |
title_full_unstemmed | The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys |
title_short | The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys |
title_sort | kinematic and kinetic development of sprinting and countermovement jump performance in boys |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.547075 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wdowskimaximilianm thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT noonmark thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT mundypeterd thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT gittoesmariannejr thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT duncanmichaelj thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT wdowskimaximilianm kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT noonmark kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT mundypeterd kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT gittoesmariannejr kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys AT duncanmichaelj kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys |