Cargando…

The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the kinematics and kinetics of sprint running and countermovement jump performance between the ages of 8–9, and 11–12 years old boys in order to understand the developmental plateau in performance. METHODS: 18 physically active boys (Age: 10.1 ± 1.6),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wdowski, Maximilian M., Noon, Mark, Mundy, Peter D., Gittoes, Marianne J. R., Duncan, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.547075
_version_ 1783611867073085440
author Wdowski, Maximilian M.
Noon, Mark
Mundy, Peter D.
Gittoes, Marianne J. R.
Duncan, Michael J.
author_facet Wdowski, Maximilian M.
Noon, Mark
Mundy, Peter D.
Gittoes, Marianne J. R.
Duncan, Michael J.
author_sort Wdowski, Maximilian M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the kinematics and kinetics of sprint running and countermovement jump performance between the ages of 8–9, and 11–12 years old boys in order to understand the developmental plateau in performance. METHODS: 18 physically active boys (Age: 10.1 ± 1.6), in an under 9 years old (U9) and an under 12 years old (U12) group performed 15 m sprints and countermovement jumps. A 3D motion analysis system (200 Hz), synchronized with four force platforms (1,000 Hz), was used to collect kinematic and kinetic data during the first stance phase of the sprint run and the countermovement jump. RESULTS: The U12 group had a significantly greater height (U9: 1.364 ± 0.064 m; U12: 1.548 ± 0.046 mm), larger mass (U9: 30.9 ± 3.5 kg; U12: 43.9 ± 5.0 kg), superior sprint performance over 0–5 m (U9: 1.31 ± 0.007 s; U12: 1.23 ± 0.009 s) and 0–15 m (U9: 3.20 ± 0.17 s; U12: 3.01 ± 0.20 s), and increased jump height (U9: 0.17 ± 0.06 m; U12: 0.24 ± 0.10 m) than the under nine group. During the first stance phase of the sprint the U12 group had a significantly greater vertical (U9: 0.22 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.25 ± 0.03 BW.s) and horizontal impulse (U9: 0.07 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.09 ± 0.03 BW.s) than the U9 group. When performing a countermovement jump the U12 group had a significantly greater mean average eccentric force (U9: 407.3 ± 55.0 N; U12: 542.2 ± 65.1 N) and mean average concentric force (U9: 495.8 ± 41.3 N; U12: 684.0 ± 62.1 N). Joint kinematics for the countermovement jump were significantly different between age groups for the ankle range of motion (U9: 80.6 ± 17.4°; U12: 64.1 ± 9°) and knee minimum joint angle (U9: −5.7 ± 3.9°; U12: 0.0 ± 4.4°). Conclusion: The study demonstrates for the first time that the development of physically active boys between the ages of 8–9 to 11–12 years increased the ground reaction forces and impulses during sprint running and countermovement jumps, but that sprint running technique had not developed during this period. Furthermore, countermovement jump technique was still emerging at the age of 8–9 years old. Practitioners need to implement on-going fine-grained sprint running and CMJ technique sessions to ensure that the increased force producing capabilities that come with age are appropriately utilized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7676893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76768932020-11-27 The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys Wdowski, Maximilian M. Noon, Mark Mundy, Peter D. Gittoes, Marianne J. R. Duncan, Michael J. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the kinematics and kinetics of sprint running and countermovement jump performance between the ages of 8–9, and 11–12 years old boys in order to understand the developmental plateau in performance. METHODS: 18 physically active boys (Age: 10.1 ± 1.6), in an under 9 years old (U9) and an under 12 years old (U12) group performed 15 m sprints and countermovement jumps. A 3D motion analysis system (200 Hz), synchronized with four force platforms (1,000 Hz), was used to collect kinematic and kinetic data during the first stance phase of the sprint run and the countermovement jump. RESULTS: The U12 group had a significantly greater height (U9: 1.364 ± 0.064 m; U12: 1.548 ± 0.046 mm), larger mass (U9: 30.9 ± 3.5 kg; U12: 43.9 ± 5.0 kg), superior sprint performance over 0–5 m (U9: 1.31 ± 0.007 s; U12: 1.23 ± 0.009 s) and 0–15 m (U9: 3.20 ± 0.17 s; U12: 3.01 ± 0.20 s), and increased jump height (U9: 0.17 ± 0.06 m; U12: 0.24 ± 0.10 m) than the under nine group. During the first stance phase of the sprint the U12 group had a significantly greater vertical (U9: 0.22 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.25 ± 0.03 BW.s) and horizontal impulse (U9: 0.07 ± 0.02 BW/s; U12: 0.09 ± 0.03 BW.s) than the U9 group. When performing a countermovement jump the U12 group had a significantly greater mean average eccentric force (U9: 407.3 ± 55.0 N; U12: 542.2 ± 65.1 N) and mean average concentric force (U9: 495.8 ± 41.3 N; U12: 684.0 ± 62.1 N). Joint kinematics for the countermovement jump were significantly different between age groups for the ankle range of motion (U9: 80.6 ± 17.4°; U12: 64.1 ± 9°) and knee minimum joint angle (U9: −5.7 ± 3.9°; U12: 0.0 ± 4.4°). Conclusion: The study demonstrates for the first time that the development of physically active boys between the ages of 8–9 to 11–12 years increased the ground reaction forces and impulses during sprint running and countermovement jumps, but that sprint running technique had not developed during this period. Furthermore, countermovement jump technique was still emerging at the age of 8–9 years old. Practitioners need to implement on-going fine-grained sprint running and CMJ technique sessions to ensure that the increased force producing capabilities that come with age are appropriately utilized. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7676893/ /pubmed/33251191 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.547075 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wdowski, Noon, Mundy, Gittoes and Duncan. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Wdowski, Maximilian M.
Noon, Mark
Mundy, Peter D.
Gittoes, Marianne J. R.
Duncan, Michael J.
The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
title The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
title_full The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
title_fullStr The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
title_full_unstemmed The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
title_short The Kinematic and Kinetic Development of Sprinting and Countermovement Jump Performance in Boys
title_sort kinematic and kinetic development of sprinting and countermovement jump performance in boys
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251191
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.547075
work_keys_str_mv AT wdowskimaximilianm thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT noonmark thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT mundypeterd thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT gittoesmariannejr thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT duncanmichaelj thekinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT wdowskimaximilianm kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT noonmark kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT mundypeterd kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT gittoesmariannejr kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys
AT duncanmichaelj kinematicandkineticdevelopmentofsprintingandcountermovementjumpperformanceinboys