Cargando…

Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis

Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basham, Maleeha Ali, Ghumro, Hassan Ali, Syed, Muhammad Usman Shah, Saeed, Sumayyah, Pervez, Syed Annas, Farooque, Umar, Kumar, Naresh, Imtiaz, Zainab, Sajjad, Muhsana, Jamal, Aisha, Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra, Idris, Farha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33224665
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11071
_version_ 1783611880546238464
author Basham, Maleeha Ali
Ghumro, Hassan Ali
Syed, Muhammad Usman Shah
Saeed, Sumayyah
Pervez, Syed Annas
Farooque, Umar
Kumar, Naresh
Imtiaz, Zainab
Sajjad, Muhsana
Jamal, Aisha
Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra
Idris, Farha
author_facet Basham, Maleeha Ali
Ghumro, Hassan Ali
Syed, Muhammad Usman Shah
Saeed, Sumayyah
Pervez, Syed Annas
Farooque, Umar
Kumar, Naresh
Imtiaz, Zainab
Sajjad, Muhsana
Jamal, Aisha
Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra
Idris, Farha
author_sort Basham, Maleeha Ali
collection PubMed
description Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to <79%, while scores 10 and above predicted a 100% mortality rate. A mean qSOFA score of three predicted a 67% mortality rate. Univariate logistic analysis performed with odds ratio showed that the mean qSOFA score was in comparison more closely able to predict mortality, followed by mean SOFA score (p values < 0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of mortality. However, qSOFA is more closely accurate in predicting mortality than SOFA. But further analysis with larger sample size for a longer duration as well as the application of these scores in the emergency departments and general wards can prove the precision of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7676951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76769512020-11-20 Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis Basham, Maleeha Ali Ghumro, Hassan Ali Syed, Muhammad Usman Shah Saeed, Sumayyah Pervez, Syed Annas Farooque, Umar Kumar, Naresh Imtiaz, Zainab Sajjad, Muhsana Jamal, Aisha Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra Idris, Farha Cureus Anesthesiology Introduction Sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-induced hypotension not improved by adequate fluid resuscitation) are among the most common reasons for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and display high mortality rates. Different scoring systems are used to diagnose and predict the mortality of patients having sepsis. This study aims to validate the prognostic accuracy of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) in determining the mortality of both septic and non-septic patients. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in May 2018 in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Past 200 patient records, from January 2018 to April 2018, were examined, and 20 records were discarded due to insufficient data. Sufficient observational data were collected, which was used to assess the validity of the SOFA and qSOFA in determining the mortality rate of sepsis. A comparison of the two modalities was made. Results Out of the 200 patients, 180 were enrolled. Data from their entire ICU stay were used to calculate their initial, highest, and mean SOFA and qSOFA. Mean SOFA score up to nine correlated with a mortality rate of up to <79%, while scores 10 and above predicted a 100% mortality rate. A mean qSOFA score of three predicted a 67% mortality rate. Univariate logistic analysis performed with odds ratio showed that the mean qSOFA score was in comparison more closely able to predict mortality, followed by mean SOFA score (p values < 0.01). Conclusions This study concluded that both SOFA and qSOFA scores are good predictors of mortality. However, qSOFA is more closely accurate in predicting mortality than SOFA. But further analysis with larger sample size for a longer duration as well as the application of these scores in the emergency departments and general wards can prove the precision of this study. Cureus 2020-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7676951/ /pubmed/33224665 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11071 Text en Copyright © 2020, Basham et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Basham, Maleeha Ali
Ghumro, Hassan Ali
Syed, Muhammad Usman Shah
Saeed, Sumayyah
Pervez, Syed Annas
Farooque, Umar
Kumar, Naresh
Imtiaz, Zainab
Sajjad, Muhsana
Jamal, Aisha
Aslam Siddiqui, Iqra
Idris, Farha
Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
title Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
title_full Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
title_fullStr Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
title_short Validity of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in Assessing Mortality Rate in the Intensive Care Unit With or Without Sepsis
title_sort validity of sequential organ failure assessment and quick sequential organ failure assessment in assessing mortality rate in the intensive care unit with or without sepsis
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7676951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33224665
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11071
work_keys_str_mv AT bashammaleehaali validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT ghumrohassanali validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT syedmuhammadusmanshah validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT saeedsumayyah validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT pervezsyedannas validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT farooqueumar validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT kumarnaresh validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT imtiazzainab validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT sajjadmuhsana validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT jamalaisha validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT aslamsiddiquiiqra validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis
AT idrisfarha validityofsequentialorganfailureassessmentandquicksequentialorganfailureassessmentinassessingmortalityrateintheintensivecareunitwithorwithoutsepsis