Cargando…

Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study

OBJECTIVES: Due to a substantial proportion of asymptomatic and mild courses, many severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections remain unreported. Therefore, assessment of seroprevalence may detect the real burden of disease. We aimed to determine and characterize the rate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weis, Sebastian, Scherag, André, Baier, Michael, Kiehntopf, Michael, Kamradt, Thomas, Kolanos, Steffi, Ankert, Juliane, Glöckner, Stefan, Makarewicz, Oliwia, Hagel, Stefan, Bahrs, Christina, Kimmig, Aurelia, Proquitté, Hans, Guerra, Joel, Rimek, Dagmar, Löffler, Bettina, Pletz, Mathias W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.009
_version_ 1783611899583135744
author Weis, Sebastian
Scherag, André
Baier, Michael
Kiehntopf, Michael
Kamradt, Thomas
Kolanos, Steffi
Ankert, Juliane
Glöckner, Stefan
Makarewicz, Oliwia
Hagel, Stefan
Bahrs, Christina
Kimmig, Aurelia
Proquitté, Hans
Guerra, Joel
Rimek, Dagmar
Löffler, Bettina
Pletz, Mathias W.
author_facet Weis, Sebastian
Scherag, André
Baier, Michael
Kiehntopf, Michael
Kamradt, Thomas
Kolanos, Steffi
Ankert, Juliane
Glöckner, Stefan
Makarewicz, Oliwia
Hagel, Stefan
Bahrs, Christina
Kimmig, Aurelia
Proquitté, Hans
Guerra, Joel
Rimek, Dagmar
Löffler, Bettina
Pletz, Mathias W.
author_sort Weis, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Due to a substantial proportion of asymptomatic and mild courses, many severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections remain unreported. Therefore, assessment of seroprevalence may detect the real burden of disease. We aimed to determine and characterize the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the resulting seroprevalence in a defined population. The primary objective of the study was to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence using six different IgG-detecting immunoassays. Secondary objectives of the study were: (a) to determine potential risk factors for symptomatic versus asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 courses, and (b) to investigate the rate of virus RNA-persistence. METHODS: CoNAN is a population-based cohort study performed in the community Neustadt am Rennsteig, Germany, which was quarantined from 22 March to 5 April after six SARS-CoV-2 cases were detected in the village's population. The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak comprised 51 cases and 3 deaths. The CoNAN study was performed from 13 May to 22 May 2020, 6 weeks after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 626 participants (71% of the community population) for PCR and antibody testing in the study. All actual SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were negative. Fifty-two out of 620 (8.4%) participants had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in at least two different assays. There were 38 participants with previously PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those, only 19 (50%) displayed anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We also show that antibody-positive participants with symptoms compatible with a respiratory tract infection had significantly higher antibody levels then asymptomatic participants (EU-assay: median 2.9 versus 7.2 IgG-index, p 0.002; DS-assay: median 45.2 versus 143 AU/mL, p 0.002). Persisting viral replication was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our data question the relevance and reliability of IgG antibody testing to detect past SARS-CoV-2 infections 6 weeks after an outbreak. We conclude that assessing immunity for SARS-CoV-2 infection should not rely on antibody tests alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677041
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76770412020-11-20 Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study Weis, Sebastian Scherag, André Baier, Michael Kiehntopf, Michael Kamradt, Thomas Kolanos, Steffi Ankert, Juliane Glöckner, Stefan Makarewicz, Oliwia Hagel, Stefan Bahrs, Christina Kimmig, Aurelia Proquitté, Hans Guerra, Joel Rimek, Dagmar Löffler, Bettina Pletz, Mathias W. Clin Microbiol Infect Original Article OBJECTIVES: Due to a substantial proportion of asymptomatic and mild courses, many severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections remain unreported. Therefore, assessment of seroprevalence may detect the real burden of disease. We aimed to determine and characterize the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections and the resulting seroprevalence in a defined population. The primary objective of the study was to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence using six different IgG-detecting immunoassays. Secondary objectives of the study were: (a) to determine potential risk factors for symptomatic versus asymptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 courses, and (b) to investigate the rate of virus RNA-persistence. METHODS: CoNAN is a population-based cohort study performed in the community Neustadt am Rennsteig, Germany, which was quarantined from 22 March to 5 April after six SARS-CoV-2 cases were detected in the village's population. The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak comprised 51 cases and 3 deaths. The CoNAN study was performed from 13 May to 22 May 2020, 6 weeks after a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 626 participants (71% of the community population) for PCR and antibody testing in the study. All actual SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were negative. Fifty-two out of 620 (8.4%) participants had antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in at least two different assays. There were 38 participants with previously PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Of those, only 19 (50%) displayed anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We also show that antibody-positive participants with symptoms compatible with a respiratory tract infection had significantly higher antibody levels then asymptomatic participants (EU-assay: median 2.9 versus 7.2 IgG-index, p 0.002; DS-assay: median 45.2 versus 143 AU/mL, p 0.002). Persisting viral replication was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our data question the relevance and reliability of IgG antibody testing to detect past SARS-CoV-2 infections 6 weeks after an outbreak. We conclude that assessing immunity for SARS-CoV-2 infection should not rely on antibody tests alone. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2021-03 2020-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7677041/ /pubmed/33221432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.009 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Original Article
Weis, Sebastian
Scherag, André
Baier, Michael
Kiehntopf, Michael
Kamradt, Thomas
Kolanos, Steffi
Ankert, Juliane
Glöckner, Stefan
Makarewicz, Oliwia
Hagel, Stefan
Bahrs, Christina
Kimmig, Aurelia
Proquitté, Hans
Guerra, Joel
Rimek, Dagmar
Löffler, Bettina
Pletz, Mathias W.
Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study
title Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study
title_full Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study
title_fullStr Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study
title_full_unstemmed Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study
title_short Antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely PCR-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the CoNAN study
title_sort antibody response using six different serological assays in a completely pcr-tested community after a coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—the conan study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.009
work_keys_str_mv AT weissebastian antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT scheragandre antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT baiermichael antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT kiehntopfmichael antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT kamradtthomas antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT kolanossteffi antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT ankertjuliane antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT glocknerstefan antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT makarewiczoliwia antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT hagelstefan antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT bahrschristina antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT kimmigaurelia antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT proquittehans antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT guerrajoel antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT rimekdagmar antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT lofflerbettina antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT pletzmathiasw antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy
AT antibodyresponseusingsixdifferentserologicalassaysinacompletelypcrtestedcommunityafteracoronavirusdisease2019outbreaktheconanstudy