Cargando…

Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?

BACKGROUND: Routine histopathological examination (RHPE) of all gallbladder specimens is required to detect the presence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or any other pathology. The work aims to study the incidence and the clinical significance of detecting unusual gallbladder findings upon the RHPE o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasan, Abdulkarim, Nafie, Khalid, Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef, Ismail, Amal, Monazea, Khaled, Baheeg, Mohamad, Rady, Kamal, Elhawary, Reda, Ibrahim, Adel A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.019
_version_ 1783611913268101120
author Hasan, Abdulkarim
Nafie, Khalid
Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef
Ismail, Amal
Monazea, Khaled
Baheeg, Mohamad
Rady, Kamal
Elhawary, Reda
Ibrahim, Adel A.
author_facet Hasan, Abdulkarim
Nafie, Khalid
Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef
Ismail, Amal
Monazea, Khaled
Baheeg, Mohamad
Rady, Kamal
Elhawary, Reda
Ibrahim, Adel A.
author_sort Hasan, Abdulkarim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine histopathological examination (RHPE) of all gallbladder specimens is required to detect the presence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or any other pathology. The work aims to study the incidence and the clinical significance of detecting unusual gallbladder findings upon the RHPE of the referred cholecystectomy specimens to a histopathology laboratory section at a referral hospital in Saudi Arabia during one year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2019 to May 2020, all histopathology reports of 444 consecutive gallbladder specimens after elective and emergency cholecystectomies were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups; usual findings and unusual findings which were reviewed blindly by two other pathology consultants. Frequencies, descriptive statistics, normality test, and correlations were run. The Interrater reliability between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was assessed statistically by kappa test. RESULTS: The results of histopathological examination of these gallbladder specimens showed that chronic cholecystitis was found in 296 out of 444 total cases (66.7%), acute cholecystitis in 52 cases (11.7%), and other associated usual findings in 85 cases (19%). Three cases (0.7%) of incidental carcinomas and other three cases (0.7%) of dysplasia. Eosinophilic carcinomas were detected in two cases (0.45%), gallbladder complete septum was found in one case, and one case of Phrygian cap anomaly. All patients with gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed incidentally during the histopathological examination. CONCLUSIONS: RHPE of cholecystectomy materials are required to confirm the final diagnosis and document any other pathology. Failure to detect incidental occult carcinoma may be catastrophic, given the poor prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76771122020-11-27 Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant? Hasan, Abdulkarim Nafie, Khalid Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef Ismail, Amal Monazea, Khaled Baheeg, Mohamad Rady, Kamal Elhawary, Reda Ibrahim, Adel A. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Cross-sectional Study BACKGROUND: Routine histopathological examination (RHPE) of all gallbladder specimens is required to detect the presence of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) or any other pathology. The work aims to study the incidence and the clinical significance of detecting unusual gallbladder findings upon the RHPE of the referred cholecystectomy specimens to a histopathology laboratory section at a referral hospital in Saudi Arabia during one year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 2019 to May 2020, all histopathology reports of 444 consecutive gallbladder specimens after elective and emergency cholecystectomies were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups; usual findings and unusual findings which were reviewed blindly by two other pathology consultants. Frequencies, descriptive statistics, normality test, and correlations were run. The Interrater reliability between clinical and histopathological diagnosis was assessed statistically by kappa test. RESULTS: The results of histopathological examination of these gallbladder specimens showed that chronic cholecystitis was found in 296 out of 444 total cases (66.7%), acute cholecystitis in 52 cases (11.7%), and other associated usual findings in 85 cases (19%). Three cases (0.7%) of incidental carcinomas and other three cases (0.7%) of dysplasia. Eosinophilic carcinomas were detected in two cases (0.45%), gallbladder complete septum was found in one case, and one case of Phrygian cap anomaly. All patients with gallbladder carcinoma were diagnosed incidentally during the histopathological examination. CONCLUSIONS: RHPE of cholecystectomy materials are required to confirm the final diagnosis and document any other pathology. Failure to detect incidental occult carcinoma may be catastrophic, given the poor prognosis. Elsevier 2020-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7677112/ /pubmed/33251000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.019 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Cross-sectional Study
Hasan, Abdulkarim
Nafie, Khalid
Aldossary, Mohammed Yousef
Ismail, Amal
Monazea, Khaled
Baheeg, Mohamad
Rady, Kamal
Elhawary, Reda
Ibrahim, Adel A.
Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
title Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
title_full Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
title_fullStr Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
title_full_unstemmed Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
title_short Unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: How big and how significant?
title_sort unexpected histopathology results following routine examination of cholecystectomy specimens: how big and how significant?
topic Cross-sectional Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33251000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.019
work_keys_str_mv AT hasanabdulkarim unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT nafiekhalid unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT aldossarymohammedyousef unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT ismailamal unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT monazeakhaled unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT baheegmohamad unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT radykamal unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT elhawaryreda unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant
AT ibrahimadela unexpectedhistopathologyresultsfollowingroutineexaminationofcholecystectomyspecimenshowbigandhowsignificant