Cargando…

The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision

PURPOSE: The effect of duration of optotype presentation on visual acuity measures has been extensively studied under photopic conditions. However, systematic data on duration dependence of acuity values under mesopic and scotopic conditions is scarce, despite being highly relevant for many visual t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heinrich, Sven P., Blechenberg, Torben, Reichel, Christoph, Bach, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04867-6
_version_ 1783611936986890240
author Heinrich, Sven P.
Blechenberg, Torben
Reichel, Christoph
Bach, Michael
author_facet Heinrich, Sven P.
Blechenberg, Torben
Reichel, Christoph
Bach, Michael
author_sort Heinrich, Sven P.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The effect of duration of optotype presentation on visual acuity measures has been extensively studied under photopic conditions. However, systematic data on duration dependence of acuity values under mesopic and scotopic conditions is scarce, despite being highly relevant for many visual tasks including night driving, and for clinical diagnostic applications. The present study aims to address this void. METHODS: We measured Landolt C acuity under photopic (90 cd/m(2)), mesopic (0.7 cd/m(2)), and scotopic (0.009 cd/m(2)) conditions for several optotype presentation durations ranging from 0.1 to 10 s using the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test. Two age groups were tested (young, 18–29 years, and older, 61–74 years). RESULTS: As expected, under all luminance conditions, better acuity values were found for longer presentation durations. Photopic acuity in young participants decreased by about 0.25 log units from 0.1 to 10 s; mesopic vision mimicked the photopic visual behavior. Scotopic acuities depended more strongly on presentation duration (difference > 0.78 log units) than photopic values. There was no consistent pattern of correlation between luminance conditions across participants. We found a qualitative similarity between younger and older participants, despite higher variability among the latter and differences in absolute acuity: Photopic acuity difference (0.1 vs. 10 s) for the older participants was 0.19 log units, and scotopic difference was > 0.62 log units. CONCLUSION: Scotopic acuity is more susceptible to changes in stimulus duration than photopic vision, with considerable interindividual variability. The latter may reflect differences in aging and sub-clinical pathophysiological processes and might have consequences for visual performance during nocturnal activities such as driving at night. Acuity testing with briefly presented scotopic stimuli might increase the usefulness of acuity assessment for tracking of the health state of the visual system. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76772802020-11-23 The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision Heinrich, Sven P. Blechenberg, Torben Reichel, Christoph Bach, Michael Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Miscellaneous PURPOSE: The effect of duration of optotype presentation on visual acuity measures has been extensively studied under photopic conditions. However, systematic data on duration dependence of acuity values under mesopic and scotopic conditions is scarce, despite being highly relevant for many visual tasks including night driving, and for clinical diagnostic applications. The present study aims to address this void. METHODS: We measured Landolt C acuity under photopic (90 cd/m(2)), mesopic (0.7 cd/m(2)), and scotopic (0.009 cd/m(2)) conditions for several optotype presentation durations ranging from 0.1 to 10 s using the Freiburg Acuity and Contrast Test. Two age groups were tested (young, 18–29 years, and older, 61–74 years). RESULTS: As expected, under all luminance conditions, better acuity values were found for longer presentation durations. Photopic acuity in young participants decreased by about 0.25 log units from 0.1 to 10 s; mesopic vision mimicked the photopic visual behavior. Scotopic acuities depended more strongly on presentation duration (difference > 0.78 log units) than photopic values. There was no consistent pattern of correlation between luminance conditions across participants. We found a qualitative similarity between younger and older participants, despite higher variability among the latter and differences in absolute acuity: Photopic acuity difference (0.1 vs. 10 s) for the older participants was 0.19 log units, and scotopic difference was > 0.62 log units. CONCLUSION: Scotopic acuity is more susceptible to changes in stimulus duration than photopic vision, with considerable interindividual variability. The latter may reflect differences in aging and sub-clinical pathophysiological processes and might have consequences for visual performance during nocturnal activities such as driving at night. Acuity testing with briefly presented scotopic stimuli might increase the usefulness of acuity assessment for tracking of the health state of the visual system. [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7677280/ /pubmed/32803325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04867-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Miscellaneous
Heinrich, Sven P.
Blechenberg, Torben
Reichel, Christoph
Bach, Michael
The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
title The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
title_full The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
title_fullStr The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
title_full_unstemmed The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
title_short The “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
title_sort “speed” of acuity in scotopic vs. photopic vision
topic Miscellaneous
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32803325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04867-6
work_keys_str_mv AT heinrichsvenp thespeedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT blechenbergtorben thespeedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT reichelchristoph thespeedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT bachmichael thespeedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT heinrichsvenp speedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT blechenbergtorben speedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT reichelchristoph speedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision
AT bachmichael speedofacuityinscotopicvsphotopicvision