Cargando…

An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION: Over one million people in the UK identify as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning). Research has shown that this population experience differing cancer risk factors compared with non-LGBTQ+ patients and persistent inequalities in cancer care. Literature co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berner, Alison May, Hughes, Daniel Johnathan, Tharmalingam, Hannah, Baker, Tom, Heyworth, Benjamin, Banerjee, Susana, Saunders, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906
_version_ 1783611947992743936
author Berner, Alison May
Hughes, Daniel Johnathan
Tharmalingam, Hannah
Baker, Tom
Heyworth, Benjamin
Banerjee, Susana
Saunders, Daniel
author_facet Berner, Alison May
Hughes, Daniel Johnathan
Tharmalingam, Hannah
Baker, Tom
Heyworth, Benjamin
Banerjee, Susana
Saunders, Daniel
author_sort Berner, Alison May
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Over one million people in the UK identify as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning). Research has shown that this population experience differing cancer risk factors compared with non-LGBTQ+ patients and persistent inequalities in cancer care. Literature concerning the knowledge of oncologists of this group’s healthcare needs is limited; our study aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients. METHODS: A 53-question survey was delivered via a secure online platform. Questions covered respondent demographics, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours with the majority of responses on a Likert scale. Oncologists were recruited via email from professional bodies and social media promotion. Informed consent was sought and responses fully anonymised. Multifactorial ordinal logistic regression and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess for interactions between demographics and responses with Holm-Bonferroni multiple testing correction. RESULTS: 258 fully completed responses were received. Respondents had a median age of 43 years (range 28–69); 65% consultants and 35% registrars; 42% medical, and 54% clinical, oncologists. 84% felt comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but only 8% agreed that they were confident in their knowledge of specific LGBTQ+ patient healthcare needs. There were low rates of routine enquiry about sexual orientation (5%), gender identity (3%) and preferred pronouns (2%). 68% of oncologists felt LGBTQ+ healthcare needs should be a mandatory component of postgraduate training. CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that UK oncologists feel comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but may fail to identify these patients in their clinic, making it more difficult to meet LGBTQ+ healthcare needs. There is self-awareness of deficits in knowledge of LGBTQ+ healthcare and a willingness to address this through postgraduate training. Educational resources collated and developed in accordance with this study would potentially improve the confidence of oncologists in treating LGBTQ+ patients and the cancer care these patients receive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677327
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76773272020-11-30 An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer Berner, Alison May Hughes, Daniel Johnathan Tharmalingam, Hannah Baker, Tom Heyworth, Benjamin Banerjee, Susana Saunders, Daniel ESMO Open Original Research INTRODUCTION: Over one million people in the UK identify as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning). Research has shown that this population experience differing cancer risk factors compared with non-LGBTQ+ patients and persistent inequalities in cancer care. Literature concerning the knowledge of oncologists of this group’s healthcare needs is limited; our study aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients. METHODS: A 53-question survey was delivered via a secure online platform. Questions covered respondent demographics, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours with the majority of responses on a Likert scale. Oncologists were recruited via email from professional bodies and social media promotion. Informed consent was sought and responses fully anonymised. Multifactorial ordinal logistic regression and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess for interactions between demographics and responses with Holm-Bonferroni multiple testing correction. RESULTS: 258 fully completed responses were received. Respondents had a median age of 43 years (range 28–69); 65% consultants and 35% registrars; 42% medical, and 54% clinical, oncologists. 84% felt comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but only 8% agreed that they were confident in their knowledge of specific LGBTQ+ patient healthcare needs. There were low rates of routine enquiry about sexual orientation (5%), gender identity (3%) and preferred pronouns (2%). 68% of oncologists felt LGBTQ+ healthcare needs should be a mandatory component of postgraduate training. CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that UK oncologists feel comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but may fail to identify these patients in their clinic, making it more difficult to meet LGBTQ+ healthcare needs. There is self-awareness of deficits in knowledge of LGBTQ+ healthcare and a willingness to address this through postgraduate training. Educational resources collated and developed in accordance with this study would potentially improve the confidence of oncologists in treating LGBTQ+ patients and the cancer care these patients receive. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7677327/ /pubmed/33208489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Berner, Alison May
Hughes, Daniel Johnathan
Tharmalingam, Hannah
Baker, Tom
Heyworth, Benjamin
Banerjee, Susana
Saunders, Daniel
An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
title An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
title_full An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
title_fullStr An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
title_short An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
title_sort evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of uk oncologists about lgbtq+ patients with cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677327/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208489
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906
work_keys_str_mv AT berneralisonmay anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT hughesdanieljohnathan anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT tharmalingamhannah anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT bakertom anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT heyworthbenjamin anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT banerjeesusana anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT saundersdaniel anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT berneralisonmay evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT hughesdanieljohnathan evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT tharmalingamhannah evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT bakertom evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT heyworthbenjamin evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT banerjeesusana evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer
AT saundersdaniel evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer