Cargando…
An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
INTRODUCTION: Over one million people in the UK identify as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning). Research has shown that this population experience differing cancer risk factors compared with non-LGBTQ+ patients and persistent inequalities in cancer care. Literature co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906 |
_version_ | 1783611947992743936 |
---|---|
author | Berner, Alison May Hughes, Daniel Johnathan Tharmalingam, Hannah Baker, Tom Heyworth, Benjamin Banerjee, Susana Saunders, Daniel |
author_facet | Berner, Alison May Hughes, Daniel Johnathan Tharmalingam, Hannah Baker, Tom Heyworth, Benjamin Banerjee, Susana Saunders, Daniel |
author_sort | Berner, Alison May |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Over one million people in the UK identify as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning). Research has shown that this population experience differing cancer risk factors compared with non-LGBTQ+ patients and persistent inequalities in cancer care. Literature concerning the knowledge of oncologists of this group’s healthcare needs is limited; our study aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients. METHODS: A 53-question survey was delivered via a secure online platform. Questions covered respondent demographics, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours with the majority of responses on a Likert scale. Oncologists were recruited via email from professional bodies and social media promotion. Informed consent was sought and responses fully anonymised. Multifactorial ordinal logistic regression and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess for interactions between demographics and responses with Holm-Bonferroni multiple testing correction. RESULTS: 258 fully completed responses were received. Respondents had a median age of 43 years (range 28–69); 65% consultants and 35% registrars; 42% medical, and 54% clinical, oncologists. 84% felt comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but only 8% agreed that they were confident in their knowledge of specific LGBTQ+ patient healthcare needs. There were low rates of routine enquiry about sexual orientation (5%), gender identity (3%) and preferred pronouns (2%). 68% of oncologists felt LGBTQ+ healthcare needs should be a mandatory component of postgraduate training. CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that UK oncologists feel comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but may fail to identify these patients in their clinic, making it more difficult to meet LGBTQ+ healthcare needs. There is self-awareness of deficits in knowledge of LGBTQ+ healthcare and a willingness to address this through postgraduate training. Educational resources collated and developed in accordance with this study would potentially improve the confidence of oncologists in treating LGBTQ+ patients and the cancer care these patients receive. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7677327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76773272020-11-30 An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer Berner, Alison May Hughes, Daniel Johnathan Tharmalingam, Hannah Baker, Tom Heyworth, Benjamin Banerjee, Susana Saunders, Daniel ESMO Open Original Research INTRODUCTION: Over one million people in the UK identify as LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer or questioning). Research has shown that this population experience differing cancer risk factors compared with non-LGBTQ+ patients and persistent inequalities in cancer care. Literature concerning the knowledge of oncologists of this group’s healthcare needs is limited; our study aimed to evaluate knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients. METHODS: A 53-question survey was delivered via a secure online platform. Questions covered respondent demographics, knowledge, attitudes and behaviours with the majority of responses on a Likert scale. Oncologists were recruited via email from professional bodies and social media promotion. Informed consent was sought and responses fully anonymised. Multifactorial ordinal logistic regression and Fisher’s exact test were used to assess for interactions between demographics and responses with Holm-Bonferroni multiple testing correction. RESULTS: 258 fully completed responses were received. Respondents had a median age of 43 years (range 28–69); 65% consultants and 35% registrars; 42% medical, and 54% clinical, oncologists. 84% felt comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but only 8% agreed that they were confident in their knowledge of specific LGBTQ+ patient healthcare needs. There were low rates of routine enquiry about sexual orientation (5%), gender identity (3%) and preferred pronouns (2%). 68% of oncologists felt LGBTQ+ healthcare needs should be a mandatory component of postgraduate training. CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed that UK oncologists feel comfortable treating LGBTQ+ patients but may fail to identify these patients in their clinic, making it more difficult to meet LGBTQ+ healthcare needs. There is self-awareness of deficits in knowledge of LGBTQ+ healthcare and a willingness to address this through postgraduate training. Educational resources collated and developed in accordance with this study would potentially improve the confidence of oncologists in treating LGBTQ+ patients and the cancer care these patients receive. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7677327/ /pubmed/33208489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Berner, Alison May Hughes, Daniel Johnathan Tharmalingam, Hannah Baker, Tom Heyworth, Benjamin Banerjee, Susana Saunders, Daniel An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer |
title | An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer |
title_full | An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer |
title_short | An evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of UK oncologists about LGBTQ+ patients with cancer |
title_sort | evaluation of self-perceived knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of uk oncologists about lgbtq+ patients with cancer |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208489 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT berneralisonmay anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT hughesdanieljohnathan anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT tharmalingamhannah anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT bakertom anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT heyworthbenjamin anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT banerjeesusana anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT saundersdaniel anevaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT berneralisonmay evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT hughesdanieljohnathan evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT tharmalingamhannah evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT bakertom evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT heyworthbenjamin evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT banerjeesusana evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer AT saundersdaniel evaluationofselfperceivedknowledgeattitudesandbehavioursofukoncologistsaboutlgbtqpatientswithcancer |