Cargando…

Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health and human rights violation which impacts approximately one in three women worldwide. Some existing evidence suggests that women with disabilities are at higher risk of IPV, but is largely limited in geographical scope to the Gl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chirwa, Esnat, Jewkes, Rachel, Van Der Heijden, Ingrid, Dunkle, Kristin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002156
_version_ 1783611948245450752
author Chirwa, Esnat
Jewkes, Rachel
Van Der Heijden, Ingrid
Dunkle, Kristin
author_facet Chirwa, Esnat
Jewkes, Rachel
Van Der Heijden, Ingrid
Dunkle, Kristin
author_sort Chirwa, Esnat
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health and human rights violation which impacts approximately one in three women worldwide. Some existing evidence suggests that women with disabilities are at higher risk of IPV, but is largely limited in geographical scope to the Global North, and comparison across settings has been hampered by inconsistent measurement of both IPV and disability. METHODS: Pooled analysis of baseline data from 8549 adult women participating in seven IPV prevention studies in five countries across Africa and Asia that used collaborative, comparative measurement strategies to assess both disability and IPV. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, women with disabilities were more likely to experience past 12-month physical IPV (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.79; 95% CI 1.49 to 2.17), sexual IPV (aOR=1.98; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.89), emotional IPV (aOR=1.84; 95% CI 1.49 to 2.27) and economic IPV (aOR=1.66; 95% CI 1.45 to 1.89), with an overall association between disability and past 12-month physical/sexual IPV of aOR=1.93 (95% CI 1.52 to 2.46). Compared to women without disability, women with moderate and severe disability showed a trend of increasing risk of IPV in the past 12 months for each of physical, sexual, emotional and economic IPV. Overall, both women with moderate disability (aOR=1.86, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.21) and women with severe disability (aOR=2.63; 95% CI 1.95 to 3.55) were significantly more likely to experience any form of IPV when compared with women without disability. CONCLUSION: Women with disabilities are at increased risk of past-year IPV compared to women without disabilities across a range of settings in the Global South, and the risk of IPV increases with increasing severity of disability. IPV prevention and response efforts in these settings must find ways to include and address the needs of women with disabilities, including increased outreach and improved accessibility of programmes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76773282020-11-30 Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes Chirwa, Esnat Jewkes, Rachel Van Der Heijden, Ingrid Dunkle, Kristin BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health and human rights violation which impacts approximately one in three women worldwide. Some existing evidence suggests that women with disabilities are at higher risk of IPV, but is largely limited in geographical scope to the Global North, and comparison across settings has been hampered by inconsistent measurement of both IPV and disability. METHODS: Pooled analysis of baseline data from 8549 adult women participating in seven IPV prevention studies in five countries across Africa and Asia that used collaborative, comparative measurement strategies to assess both disability and IPV. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, women with disabilities were more likely to experience past 12-month physical IPV (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.79; 95% CI 1.49 to 2.17), sexual IPV (aOR=1.98; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.89), emotional IPV (aOR=1.84; 95% CI 1.49 to 2.27) and economic IPV (aOR=1.66; 95% CI 1.45 to 1.89), with an overall association between disability and past 12-month physical/sexual IPV of aOR=1.93 (95% CI 1.52 to 2.46). Compared to women without disability, women with moderate and severe disability showed a trend of increasing risk of IPV in the past 12 months for each of physical, sexual, emotional and economic IPV. Overall, both women with moderate disability (aOR=1.86, 95% CI 1.57 to 2.21) and women with severe disability (aOR=2.63; 95% CI 1.95 to 3.55) were significantly more likely to experience any form of IPV when compared with women without disability. CONCLUSION: Women with disabilities are at increased risk of past-year IPV compared to women without disabilities across a range of settings in the Global South, and the risk of IPV increases with increasing severity of disability. IPV prevention and response efforts in these settings must find ways to include and address the needs of women with disabilities, including increased outreach and improved accessibility of programmes. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7677328/ /pubmed/33208311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002156 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Chirwa, Esnat
Jewkes, Rachel
Van Der Heijden, Ingrid
Dunkle, Kristin
Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
title Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
title_full Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
title_fullStr Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
title_full_unstemmed Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
title_short Intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
title_sort intimate partner violence among women with and without disabilities: a pooled analysis of baseline data from seven violence-prevention programmes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002156
work_keys_str_mv AT chirwaesnat intimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenwithandwithoutdisabilitiesapooledanalysisofbaselinedatafromsevenviolencepreventionprogrammes
AT jewkesrachel intimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenwithandwithoutdisabilitiesapooledanalysisofbaselinedatafromsevenviolencepreventionprogrammes
AT vanderheijdeningrid intimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenwithandwithoutdisabilitiesapooledanalysisofbaselinedatafromsevenviolencepreventionprogrammes
AT dunklekristin intimatepartnerviolenceamongwomenwithandwithoutdisabilitiesapooledanalysisofbaselinedatafromsevenviolencepreventionprogrammes