Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Eighty percent of neonatal deaths occur among babies born preterm and/or small for gestational age (SGA). In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, approximately 40% of births occur outside of health facilities, and gestational age (GA) and birth weight are commonly unknown. Foot length (F...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Folger, Lian V, Panchal, Pratik, Eglovitch, Michelle, Whelan, Rachel, Lee, Anne CC
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002976
_version_ 1783611953313218560
author Folger, Lian V
Panchal, Pratik
Eglovitch, Michelle
Whelan, Rachel
Lee, Anne CC
author_facet Folger, Lian V
Panchal, Pratik
Eglovitch, Michelle
Whelan, Rachel
Lee, Anne CC
author_sort Folger, Lian V
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Eighty percent of neonatal deaths occur among babies born preterm and/or small for gestational age (SGA). In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, approximately 40% of births occur outside of health facilities, and gestational age (GA) and birth weight are commonly unknown. Foot length (FL) has been proposed as a simple, surrogate measurement to identify and triage small babies born in the community. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of newborn FL to classify preterm and low birthweight infants. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, POPLINE and WHO Global Health Library databases were searched. Studies of live-born infants that compared FL with GA and/or birth weight were included. Data on diagnostic accuracy were summarised, described, and pooled, as appropriate. RESULTS: Six hundred and two studies were identified and 41 included. Techniques for measuring FL included use of a firm plastic ruler, callipers, footprint or a measuring board. Twelve studies assessed the diagnostic accuracy of FL to identify preterm births; however, data were not pooled given heterogeneity and low quality of GA. 19 studies used FL to identify low birthweight infants (<2500 g, <2000 g). Among studies in Asia (n=3), FL <7.7 cm had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 87.6% (95% CI 61.1% to 99.0%) and 70.9% (95% CI 23.5% to 95.1%), respectively, to identify <2500 g infants. FL <7.3 cm had 82.1% (95% CI 63.7% to 92.2%) sensitivity and 82.1% (95% CI 59.2% to 90.8%) specificity for identifying <2000 g infants (n=3). In the African studies (n=3), FL <7.9 cm had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92.0% (95% CI 85.6% to 95.7%) and 71.9% (95% CI 44.5% to 89.1%), respectively, to identify <2500 g neonates. CONCLUSIONS: FL is a simple proxy measure that can identify babies of low birthweight with high sensitivity, though somewhat lower specificity. Additional research is needed to determine the validity of FL to identify preterm infants, and understand the programmatic impact of screening on healthcare seeking and outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020499
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76773512020-11-30 Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis Folger, Lian V Panchal, Pratik Eglovitch, Michelle Whelan, Rachel Lee, Anne CC BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Eighty percent of neonatal deaths occur among babies born preterm and/or small for gestational age (SGA). In sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, approximately 40% of births occur outside of health facilities, and gestational age (GA) and birth weight are commonly unknown. Foot length (FL) has been proposed as a simple, surrogate measurement to identify and triage small babies born in the community. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of newborn FL to classify preterm and low birthweight infants. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, POPLINE and WHO Global Health Library databases were searched. Studies of live-born infants that compared FL with GA and/or birth weight were included. Data on diagnostic accuracy were summarised, described, and pooled, as appropriate. RESULTS: Six hundred and two studies were identified and 41 included. Techniques for measuring FL included use of a firm plastic ruler, callipers, footprint or a measuring board. Twelve studies assessed the diagnostic accuracy of FL to identify preterm births; however, data were not pooled given heterogeneity and low quality of GA. 19 studies used FL to identify low birthweight infants (<2500 g, <2000 g). Among studies in Asia (n=3), FL <7.7 cm had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 87.6% (95% CI 61.1% to 99.0%) and 70.9% (95% CI 23.5% to 95.1%), respectively, to identify <2500 g infants. FL <7.3 cm had 82.1% (95% CI 63.7% to 92.2%) sensitivity and 82.1% (95% CI 59.2% to 90.8%) specificity for identifying <2000 g infants (n=3). In the African studies (n=3), FL <7.9 cm had pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92.0% (95% CI 85.6% to 95.7%) and 71.9% (95% CI 44.5% to 89.1%), respectively, to identify <2500 g neonates. CONCLUSIONS: FL is a simple proxy measure that can identify babies of low birthweight with high sensitivity, though somewhat lower specificity. Additional research is needed to determine the validity of FL to identify preterm infants, and understand the programmatic impact of screening on healthcare seeking and outcomes. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015020499 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7677351/ /pubmed/33208312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002976 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Folger, Lian V
Panchal, Pratik
Eglovitch, Michelle
Whelan, Rachel
Lee, Anne CC
Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of neonatal foot length to identify preterm and low birthweight infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002976
work_keys_str_mv AT folgerlianv diagnosticaccuracyofneonatalfootlengthtoidentifypretermandlowbirthweightinfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT panchalpratik diagnosticaccuracyofneonatalfootlengthtoidentifypretermandlowbirthweightinfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT eglovitchmichelle diagnosticaccuracyofneonatalfootlengthtoidentifypretermandlowbirthweightinfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT whelanrachel diagnosticaccuracyofneonatalfootlengthtoidentifypretermandlowbirthweightinfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leeannecc diagnosticaccuracyofneonatalfootlengthtoidentifypretermandlowbirthweightinfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis