Cargando…

How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore young people’s perspectives barriers to chlamydia testing in general practice and potential intervention functions and implementation strategies to overcome identified barriers, using a meta-theoretical framework (the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McDonagh, Lorraine K, Harwood, Hannah, Saunders, John M, Cassell, Jackie A, Rait, Greta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054309
_version_ 1783611979731042304
author McDonagh, Lorraine K
Harwood, Hannah
Saunders, John M
Cassell, Jackie A
Rait, Greta
author_facet McDonagh, Lorraine K
Harwood, Hannah
Saunders, John M
Cassell, Jackie A
Rait, Greta
author_sort McDonagh, Lorraine K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore young people’s perspectives barriers to chlamydia testing in general practice and potential intervention functions and implementation strategies to overcome identified barriers, using a meta-theoretical framework (the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW)). METHODS: Twenty-eight semistructured individual interviews were conducted with 16–24 year olds from across the UK. Purposive and convenience sampling methods were used (eg, youth organisations, charities, online platforms and chain-referrals). An inductive thematic analysis was first conducted, followed by thematic categorisation using the BCW. RESULTS: Participants identified several barriers to testing: conducting self-sampling inaccurately (physical capability); lack of information and awareness (psychological capability); testing not seen as a priority and perceived low risk (reflective motivation); embarrassment, fear and guilt (automatic motivation); the UK primary care context and location of toilets (physical opportunity) and stigma (social opportunity). Potential intervention functions raised by participants included education (eg, increase awareness of chlamydia); persuasion (eg, use of imagery/data to alter beliefs); environmental restructuring (eg, alternative sampling methods) and modelling (eg, credible sources such as celebrities). Potential implementation strategies and policy categories discussed were communication and marketing (eg, social media); service provision (eg, introduction of a young person’s health-check) and guidelines (eg, standard questions for healthcare providers). CONCLUSIONS: The BCW provided a useful framework for conceptually exploring the wide range of barriers to testing identified and possible intervention functions and policy categories to overcome said barriers. While greater education and awareness and expanded opportunities for testing were considered important, this alone will not bring about dramatic increases in testing. A societal and structural shift towards the normalisation of chlamydia testing is needed, alongside approaches which recognise the heterogeneity of this population. To ensure optimal and inclusive healthcare, researchers, clinicians and policy makers alike must consider patient diversity and the wider health issues affecting all young people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76774642020-11-30 How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model McDonagh, Lorraine K Harwood, Hannah Saunders, John M Cassell, Jackie A Rait, Greta Sex Transm Infect Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore young people’s perspectives barriers to chlamydia testing in general practice and potential intervention functions and implementation strategies to overcome identified barriers, using a meta-theoretical framework (the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW)). METHODS: Twenty-eight semistructured individual interviews were conducted with 16–24 year olds from across the UK. Purposive and convenience sampling methods were used (eg, youth organisations, charities, online platforms and chain-referrals). An inductive thematic analysis was first conducted, followed by thematic categorisation using the BCW. RESULTS: Participants identified several barriers to testing: conducting self-sampling inaccurately (physical capability); lack of information and awareness (psychological capability); testing not seen as a priority and perceived low risk (reflective motivation); embarrassment, fear and guilt (automatic motivation); the UK primary care context and location of toilets (physical opportunity) and stigma (social opportunity). Potential intervention functions raised by participants included education (eg, increase awareness of chlamydia); persuasion (eg, use of imagery/data to alter beliefs); environmental restructuring (eg, alternative sampling methods) and modelling (eg, credible sources such as celebrities). Potential implementation strategies and policy categories discussed were communication and marketing (eg, social media); service provision (eg, introduction of a young person’s health-check) and guidelines (eg, standard questions for healthcare providers). CONCLUSIONS: The BCW provided a useful framework for conceptually exploring the wide range of barriers to testing identified and possible intervention functions and policy categories to overcome said barriers. While greater education and awareness and expanded opportunities for testing were considered important, this alone will not bring about dramatic increases in testing. A societal and structural shift towards the normalisation of chlamydia testing is needed, alongside approaches which recognise the heterogeneity of this population. To ensure optimal and inclusive healthcare, researchers, clinicians and policy makers alike must consider patient diversity and the wider health issues affecting all young people. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7677464/ /pubmed/32471931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054309 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
McDonagh, Lorraine K
Harwood, Hannah
Saunders, John M
Cassell, Jackie A
Rait, Greta
How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
title How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
title_full How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
title_fullStr How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
title_full_unstemmed How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
title_short How to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
title_sort how to increase chlamydia testing in primary care: a qualitative exploration with young people and application of a meta-theoretical model
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054309
work_keys_str_mv AT mcdonaghlorrainek howtoincreasechlamydiatestinginprimarycareaqualitativeexplorationwithyoungpeopleandapplicationofametatheoreticalmodel
AT harwoodhannah howtoincreasechlamydiatestinginprimarycareaqualitativeexplorationwithyoungpeopleandapplicationofametatheoreticalmodel
AT saundersjohnm howtoincreasechlamydiatestinginprimarycareaqualitativeexplorationwithyoungpeopleandapplicationofametatheoreticalmodel
AT casselljackiea howtoincreasechlamydiatestinginprimarycareaqualitativeexplorationwithyoungpeopleandapplicationofametatheoreticalmodel
AT raitgreta howtoincreasechlamydiatestinginprimarycareaqualitativeexplorationwithyoungpeopleandapplicationofametatheoreticalmodel