Cargando…

Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of psychological burden in low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials may lack generalisability due to participation bias and control arms having elevated distress. METHODS: Current and former smokers (n=787, aged 60–75) within a real-world screening demonstration p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kummer, Sonja, Waller, Jo, Ruparel, Mamta, Duffy, Stephen W, Janes, Samuel M, Quaife, Samantha L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215054
_version_ 1783611981123551232
author Kummer, Sonja
Waller, Jo
Ruparel, Mamta
Duffy, Stephen W
Janes, Samuel M
Quaife, Samantha L
author_facet Kummer, Sonja
Waller, Jo
Ruparel, Mamta
Duffy, Stephen W
Janes, Samuel M
Quaife, Samantha L
author_sort Kummer, Sonja
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies of psychological burden in low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials may lack generalisability due to participation bias and control arms having elevated distress. METHODS: Current and former smokers (n=787, aged 60–75) within a real-world screening demonstration pilot completed measures of lung cancer worry at three time points (T(0): appointment, T(1): next day, T(2): 3 months) and anxiety and depression at two time points (T(0) and T(2)). A ‘screening unaware’ community sample (n=383) with the same age and smoking characteristics completed these measures once (T(0)). Mean scores were compared by sample type and LDCT result. RESULTS: Compared with the community sample (T(0)), mean scores were higher in the screening sample, and statistically significantly increased in adjusted analyses, for lung cancer worry at T(0) and T(2) (mean (M): 9.32; 95% CI 8.96 to 9.69 vs M: 11.34; 11.09 to 11.59 and M: 11.88; 11.49 to 12.27), for anxiety at T(0) and T(2) (M: 3.32; 2.94 to 3.70 vs M: 4.73; 4.42 to 5.04 and M: 5.78; 5.33 to 6.23) and depression at T(2) (M: 3.85; 3.44 to 4.27 vs M: 4.15; 3.76 to 4.55). Scores were highest for those with indeterminate (eg, T(2) anxiety M: 6.93; 5.65 to 8.21) and incidental findings (primary care follow-up M: 5.34; 4.67 to 6.02) and those ineligible for screening (M: 6.51; 5.25 to 7.77). Being female, younger, not in paid employment, not married/cohabiting with a partner and lower education predicted poorer psychological outcomes at T(0), but not T(2) after adjusting for baseline scores. Mean scores remained within ‘normal’ clinical ranges. CONCLUSION: Psychological distress was raised among high-risk individuals undergoing LDCT screening in a real-world setting, but overall differences were unlikely to be clinically meaningful. It will be critical to monitor the psychological impact of services longitudinally across diverse settings, including subgroups vulnerable to clinically elevated distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Lung Screen Uptake Trial was registered prospectively with the International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy (ISRCTN) (Number: ISRCTN21774741) on 23 September 2015 and the National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT02558101) on 22 September 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76774702020-11-30 Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT) Kummer, Sonja Waller, Jo Ruparel, Mamta Duffy, Stephen W Janes, Samuel M Quaife, Samantha L Thorax Lung Cancer BACKGROUND: Previous studies of psychological burden in low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening trials may lack generalisability due to participation bias and control arms having elevated distress. METHODS: Current and former smokers (n=787, aged 60–75) within a real-world screening demonstration pilot completed measures of lung cancer worry at three time points (T(0): appointment, T(1): next day, T(2): 3 months) and anxiety and depression at two time points (T(0) and T(2)). A ‘screening unaware’ community sample (n=383) with the same age and smoking characteristics completed these measures once (T(0)). Mean scores were compared by sample type and LDCT result. RESULTS: Compared with the community sample (T(0)), mean scores were higher in the screening sample, and statistically significantly increased in adjusted analyses, for lung cancer worry at T(0) and T(2) (mean (M): 9.32; 95% CI 8.96 to 9.69 vs M: 11.34; 11.09 to 11.59 and M: 11.88; 11.49 to 12.27), for anxiety at T(0) and T(2) (M: 3.32; 2.94 to 3.70 vs M: 4.73; 4.42 to 5.04 and M: 5.78; 5.33 to 6.23) and depression at T(2) (M: 3.85; 3.44 to 4.27 vs M: 4.15; 3.76 to 4.55). Scores were highest for those with indeterminate (eg, T(2) anxiety M: 6.93; 5.65 to 8.21) and incidental findings (primary care follow-up M: 5.34; 4.67 to 6.02) and those ineligible for screening (M: 6.51; 5.25 to 7.77). Being female, younger, not in paid employment, not married/cohabiting with a partner and lower education predicted poorer psychological outcomes at T(0), but not T(2) after adjusting for baseline scores. Mean scores remained within ‘normal’ clinical ranges. CONCLUSION: Psychological distress was raised among high-risk individuals undergoing LDCT screening in a real-world setting, but overall differences were unlikely to be clinically meaningful. It will be critical to monitor the psychological impact of services longitudinally across diverse settings, including subgroups vulnerable to clinically elevated distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Lung Screen Uptake Trial was registered prospectively with the International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy (ISRCTN) (Number: ISRCTN21774741) on 23 September 2015 and the National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov database (NCT02558101) on 22 September 2015. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12 2020-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7677470/ /pubmed/33087548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215054 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Kummer, Sonja
Waller, Jo
Ruparel, Mamta
Duffy, Stephen W
Janes, Samuel M
Quaife, Samantha L
Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)
title Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)
title_full Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)
title_fullStr Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)
title_full_unstemmed Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)
title_short Psychological outcomes of low-dose CT lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the Lung Screen Uptake Trial (LSUT)
title_sort psychological outcomes of low-dose ct lung cancer screening in a multisite demonstration screening pilot: the lung screen uptake trial (lsut)
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33087548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215054
work_keys_str_mv AT kummersonja psychologicaloutcomesoflowdosectlungcancerscreeninginamultisitedemonstrationscreeningpilotthelungscreenuptaketriallsut
AT wallerjo psychologicaloutcomesoflowdosectlungcancerscreeninginamultisitedemonstrationscreeningpilotthelungscreenuptaketriallsut
AT ruparelmamta psychologicaloutcomesoflowdosectlungcancerscreeninginamultisitedemonstrationscreeningpilotthelungscreenuptaketriallsut
AT duffystephenw psychologicaloutcomesoflowdosectlungcancerscreeninginamultisitedemonstrationscreeningpilotthelungscreenuptaketriallsut
AT janessamuelm psychologicaloutcomesoflowdosectlungcancerscreeninginamultisitedemonstrationscreeningpilotthelungscreenuptaketriallsut
AT quaifesamanthal psychologicaloutcomesoflowdosectlungcancerscreeninginamultisitedemonstrationscreeningpilotthelungscreenuptaketriallsut