Cargando…
Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the 2-year cost-utility ratio between tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) first followed by the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor, or vice versa, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217528 |
_version_ | 1783611985354555392 |
---|---|
author | van Mulligen, Elise Weel, Angelique E Kuijper, Tjallingius Martijn Denissen, N H A M Gerards, Andreas H de Jager, Mike H Lam-Tse, Wai-Kwan Hazes, J M van der Helm-van Mil, Annette de Jong, Pascal Hendrik Pieter Luime, Jolanda J |
author_facet | van Mulligen, Elise Weel, Angelique E Kuijper, Tjallingius Martijn Denissen, N H A M Gerards, Andreas H de Jager, Mike H Lam-Tse, Wai-Kwan Hazes, J M van der Helm-van Mil, Annette de Jong, Pascal Hendrik Pieter Luime, Jolanda J |
author_sort | van Mulligen, Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the 2-year cost-utility ratio between tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) first followed by the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor, or vice versa, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two-year data of the Tapering strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis trial were used. Patients with RA, who used both a csDMARD and a TNF-inhibitor and had a well-controlled disease (disease activity score ≤2.4 and swollen joint count≤1) for at least 3 months, were randomised into gradual tapering the csDMARD first followed by the TNF-inhibitor, or vice versa. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived from the European Quality of life questionnaire with 5 dimensions. Healthcare and productivity costs were calculated with data from patient records and questionnaires. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental net monetary benefit were used to assess cost effectiveness between both tapering strategies. RESULTS: 94 patients started tapering their TNF-inhibitor first, while the other 95 tapered their csDMARD first. QALYs (SD) were, respectively, 1.64 (0.22) and 1.65 (0.22). Medication costs were significantly lower in the patients who tapered the TNF-inhibitor first, while indirect cost were higher due to more productivity loss (p=0.10). Therefore, total costs (SD) were €38 833 (€39 616) for tapering csDMARDs first, and €39 442 (€47 271) for tapering the TNF-inhibitor (p=0.88). For willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels <€83 800 tapering, the csDMARD first has the highest probability of being cost effective, while for WTP levels >€83 800 tapering the TNF-inhibitor first has the highest probability. CONCLUSION: Our economic evaluation shows that costs are similar for both tapering strategies. Regardless of the WTP, tapering either the TNF-inhibitor or the csDMARD first is equally cost effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2754. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7677489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76774892020-11-30 Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial van Mulligen, Elise Weel, Angelique E Kuijper, Tjallingius Martijn Denissen, N H A M Gerards, Andreas H de Jager, Mike H Lam-Tse, Wai-Kwan Hazes, J M van der Helm-van Mil, Annette de Jong, Pascal Hendrik Pieter Luime, Jolanda J Ann Rheum Dis Rheumatoid Arthritis OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the 2-year cost-utility ratio between tapering conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD) first followed by the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor, or vice versa, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Two-year data of the Tapering strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis trial were used. Patients with RA, who used both a csDMARD and a TNF-inhibitor and had a well-controlled disease (disease activity score ≤2.4 and swollen joint count≤1) for at least 3 months, were randomised into gradual tapering the csDMARD first followed by the TNF-inhibitor, or vice versa. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were derived from the European Quality of life questionnaire with 5 dimensions. Healthcare and productivity costs were calculated with data from patient records and questionnaires. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and the incremental net monetary benefit were used to assess cost effectiveness between both tapering strategies. RESULTS: 94 patients started tapering their TNF-inhibitor first, while the other 95 tapered their csDMARD first. QALYs (SD) were, respectively, 1.64 (0.22) and 1.65 (0.22). Medication costs were significantly lower in the patients who tapered the TNF-inhibitor first, while indirect cost were higher due to more productivity loss (p=0.10). Therefore, total costs (SD) were €38 833 (€39 616) for tapering csDMARDs first, and €39 442 (€47 271) for tapering the TNF-inhibitor (p=0.88). For willingness-to-pay (WTP) levels <€83 800 tapering, the csDMARD first has the highest probability of being cost effective, while for WTP levels >€83 800 tapering the TNF-inhibitor first has the highest probability. CONCLUSION: Our economic evaluation shows that costs are similar for both tapering strategies. Regardless of the WTP, tapering either the TNF-inhibitor or the csDMARD first is equally cost effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2754. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12 2020-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7677489/ /pubmed/32907801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217528 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rheumatoid Arthritis van Mulligen, Elise Weel, Angelique E Kuijper, Tjallingius Martijn Denissen, N H A M Gerards, Andreas H de Jager, Mike H Lam-Tse, Wai-Kwan Hazes, J M van der Helm-van Mil, Annette de Jong, Pascal Hendrik Pieter Luime, Jolanda J Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial |
title | Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial |
title_full | Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial |
title_fullStr | Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial |
title_short | Two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the TARA trial |
title_sort | two-year cost effectiveness between two gradual tapering strategies in rheumatoid arthritis: cost-utility analysis of the tara trial |
topic | Rheumatoid Arthritis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907801 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217528 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanmulligenelise twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT weelangeliquee twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT kuijpertjallingiusmartijn twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT denissennham twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT gerardsandreash twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT dejagermikeh twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT lamtsewaikwan twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT hazesjm twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT vanderhelmvanmilannette twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT dejongpascalhendrikpieter twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial AT luimejolandaj twoyearcosteffectivenessbetweentwogradualtaperingstrategiesinrheumatoidarthritiscostutilityanalysisofthetaratrial |