Cargando…

Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices

Inspired by work on infants, we investigated whether dogs’ behaviors are guided by human displays of preference, contrasting with the animals’ own choices. In a rewarded fetching task, dogs override their own interest toward “disgusting” objects and retrieve what the owner prefers. However, in previ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kubinyi, Enikő, Szánthó, Flóra, Gilmert, Elodie, Iotchev, Ivaylo B., Miklósi, Ádám
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588916
_version_ 1783612005529157632
author Kubinyi, Enikő
Szánthó, Flóra
Gilmert, Elodie
Iotchev, Ivaylo B.
Miklósi, Ádám
author_facet Kubinyi, Enikő
Szánthó, Flóra
Gilmert, Elodie
Iotchev, Ivaylo B.
Miklósi, Ádám
author_sort Kubinyi, Enikő
collection PubMed
description Inspired by work on infants, we investigated whether dogs’ behaviors are guided by human displays of preference, contrasting with the animals’ own choices. In a rewarded fetching task, dogs override their own interest toward “disgusting” objects and retrieve what the owner prefers. However, in previous research, both objects were inherently neutral to the dogs and they might have chosen the owner’s object because a “happy owner” predicts a positive outcome. If dogs are indeed able to override their own interests, we expected them to fetch the owner’s object even if (1) they would prefer another one and (2) do not receive a reward for it. Two objects were compared, a toy (hoop) and a bracelet. After establishing that the toy was preferred by all dogs in an initial test of preference, we applied a two-choice procedure to test if either fetching or looking at the objects from a distance would be affected by the owner’s choice. In Study 1, the owner demonstrated happiness toward the bracelet and disgust toward the toy with both facial and body gestures accompanied by verbalizations. Then the owner asked the dog to fetch, without providing additional guiding cues. All dogs fetched the toy, indicating that their own choice was not overcome by the positive emotional state signaled by the owner. To avoid direct contact with the objects, in Study 2 we placed the objects on an unreachable spot after the emotion demonstration and measured the duration of looking at the objects. In the “bracelet” (non-matching) group the owners demonstrated happiness toward the bracelet and disgust toward the toy, similar to Study 1. In the “toy” (matching) group the owners showed happiness toward the toy and disgust toward the bracelet. When the objects were placed on the unreachable spot, dogs looked at both objects for the same amount of time in the non-matching group, but longer at the toy in the matching group. Although the studies did not demonstrate that dogs override their own preferences for an object, the results suggested that the owners’ expressed preference was perceived by the dogs and guided their perceptual focus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677580
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76775802020-11-24 Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices Kubinyi, Enikő Szánthó, Flóra Gilmert, Elodie Iotchev, Ivaylo B. Miklósi, Ádám Front Psychol Psychology Inspired by work on infants, we investigated whether dogs’ behaviors are guided by human displays of preference, contrasting with the animals’ own choices. In a rewarded fetching task, dogs override their own interest toward “disgusting” objects and retrieve what the owner prefers. However, in previous research, both objects were inherently neutral to the dogs and they might have chosen the owner’s object because a “happy owner” predicts a positive outcome. If dogs are indeed able to override their own interests, we expected them to fetch the owner’s object even if (1) they would prefer another one and (2) do not receive a reward for it. Two objects were compared, a toy (hoop) and a bracelet. After establishing that the toy was preferred by all dogs in an initial test of preference, we applied a two-choice procedure to test if either fetching or looking at the objects from a distance would be affected by the owner’s choice. In Study 1, the owner demonstrated happiness toward the bracelet and disgust toward the toy with both facial and body gestures accompanied by verbalizations. Then the owner asked the dog to fetch, without providing additional guiding cues. All dogs fetched the toy, indicating that their own choice was not overcome by the positive emotional state signaled by the owner. To avoid direct contact with the objects, in Study 2 we placed the objects on an unreachable spot after the emotion demonstration and measured the duration of looking at the objects. In the “bracelet” (non-matching) group the owners demonstrated happiness toward the bracelet and disgust toward the toy, similar to Study 1. In the “toy” (matching) group the owners showed happiness toward the toy and disgust toward the bracelet. When the objects were placed on the unreachable spot, dogs looked at both objects for the same amount of time in the non-matching group, but longer at the toy in the matching group. Although the studies did not demonstrate that dogs override their own preferences for an object, the results suggested that the owners’ expressed preference was perceived by the dogs and guided their perceptual focus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7677580/ /pubmed/33240181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588916 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kubinyi, Szánthó, Gilmert, Iotchev and Miklósi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kubinyi, Enikő
Szánthó, Flóra
Gilmert, Elodie
Iotchev, Ivaylo B.
Miklósi, Ádám
Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices
title Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices
title_full Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices
title_fullStr Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices
title_full_unstemmed Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices
title_short Human Expressions of Object Preference Affect Dogs’ Perceptual Focus, but Not Their Action Choices
title_sort human expressions of object preference affect dogs’ perceptual focus, but not their action choices
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677580/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33240181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588916
work_keys_str_mv AT kubinyieniko humanexpressionsofobjectpreferenceaffectdogsperceptualfocusbutnottheiractionchoices
AT szanthoflora humanexpressionsofobjectpreferenceaffectdogsperceptualfocusbutnottheiractionchoices
AT gilmertelodie humanexpressionsofobjectpreferenceaffectdogsperceptualfocusbutnottheiractionchoices
AT iotchevivaylob humanexpressionsofobjectpreferenceaffectdogsperceptualfocusbutnottheiractionchoices
AT miklosiadam humanexpressionsofobjectpreferenceaffectdogsperceptualfocusbutnottheiractionchoices