Cargando…

Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey

AIMS: The primary aim of the survey was to map the current provision of simulation training within UK and Republic of Ireland (RoI) trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) specialist training programmes to inform future design of a simulation based-curriculum. The secondary aims were to characterize; the t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Hannah K., Gregory, Robert J. H., Tennent, Duncan, Pattison, Giles T. R., Fisher, Joanne D., Griffin, Damian R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.15.BJO-2020-0011
_version_ 1783612035757506560
author James, Hannah K.
Gregory, Robert J. H.
Tennent, Duncan
Pattison, Giles T. R.
Fisher, Joanne D.
Griffin, Damian R.
author_facet James, Hannah K.
Gregory, Robert J. H.
Tennent, Duncan
Pattison, Giles T. R.
Fisher, Joanne D.
Griffin, Damian R.
author_sort James, Hannah K.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The primary aim of the survey was to map the current provision of simulation training within UK and Republic of Ireland (RoI) trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) specialist training programmes to inform future design of a simulation based-curriculum. The secondary aims were to characterize; the types of simulation offered to trainees by stage of training, the sources of funding for simulation, the barriers to providing simulation in training, and to measure current research activity assessing the educational impact of simulation. METHODS: The development of the survey was a collaborative effort between the authors and the British Orthopaedic Association Simulation Group. The survey items were embedded in the Performance and Opportunity Dashboard, which annually audits quality in training across several domains on behalf of the Speciality Advisory Committee (SAC). The survey was sent via email to the 30 training programme directors in March 2019. Data were retrieved and analyzed at the Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, UK. RESULTS: Overall, 28 of 30 programme directors completed the survey (93%). 82% of programmes had access to high-fidelity simulation facilities such as cadaveric laboratories. More than half (54%) had access to a non-technical skills simulation training. Less than half (43%) received centralized funding for simulation, a third relied on local funding such as the departmental budget, and there was a heavy reliance on industry sponsorship to partly or wholly fund simulation training (64%). Provision was higher in the mid-stages (ST3-5) compared to late-stages (ST6-8) of training, and was formally timetabled in 68% of prostgrammes. There was no assessment of the impact of simulation training using objective behavioural measures or real-world clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is currently widespread, but variable, provision of simulation in T&O training in the UK and RoI, which is likely to expand further with the new curriculum. It is important that research activity into the impact of simulation training continues, to develop an evidence base to support investment in facilities and provision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76777302020-11-20 Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey James, Hannah K. Gregory, Robert J. H. Tennent, Duncan Pattison, Giles T. R. Fisher, Joanne D. Griffin, Damian R. Bone Jt Open Trauma AIMS: The primary aim of the survey was to map the current provision of simulation training within UK and Republic of Ireland (RoI) trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) specialist training programmes to inform future design of a simulation based-curriculum. The secondary aims were to characterize; the types of simulation offered to trainees by stage of training, the sources of funding for simulation, the barriers to providing simulation in training, and to measure current research activity assessing the educational impact of simulation. METHODS: The development of the survey was a collaborative effort between the authors and the British Orthopaedic Association Simulation Group. The survey items were embedded in the Performance and Opportunity Dashboard, which annually audits quality in training across several domains on behalf of the Speciality Advisory Committee (SAC). The survey was sent via email to the 30 training programme directors in March 2019. Data were retrieved and analyzed at the Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, UK. RESULTS: Overall, 28 of 30 programme directors completed the survey (93%). 82% of programmes had access to high-fidelity simulation facilities such as cadaveric laboratories. More than half (54%) had access to a non-technical skills simulation training. Less than half (43%) received centralized funding for simulation, a third relied on local funding such as the departmental budget, and there was a heavy reliance on industry sponsorship to partly or wholly fund simulation training (64%). Provision was higher in the mid-stages (ST3-5) compared to late-stages (ST6-8) of training, and was formally timetabled in 68% of prostgrammes. There was no assessment of the impact of simulation training using objective behavioural measures or real-world clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: There is currently widespread, but variable, provision of simulation in T&O training in the UK and RoI, which is likely to expand further with the new curriculum. It is important that research activity into the impact of simulation training continues, to develop an evidence base to support investment in facilities and provision. The British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery 2020-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7677730/ /pubmed/33225283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.15.BJO-2020-0011 Text en © 2020 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Open Access This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC-ND), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Trauma
James, Hannah K.
Gregory, Robert J. H.
Tennent, Duncan
Pattison, Giles T. R.
Fisher, Joanne D.
Griffin, Damian R.
Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
title Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
title_full Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
title_fullStr Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
title_short Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
title_sort current provision of simulation in the uk and republic of ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.15.BJO-2020-0011
work_keys_str_mv AT jameshannahk currentprovisionofsimulationintheukandrepublicofirelandtraumaandorthopaedicspecialisttraininganationalsurvey
AT gregoryrobertjh currentprovisionofsimulationintheukandrepublicofirelandtraumaandorthopaedicspecialisttraininganationalsurvey
AT tennentduncan currentprovisionofsimulationintheukandrepublicofirelandtraumaandorthopaedicspecialisttraininganationalsurvey
AT pattisongilestr currentprovisionofsimulationintheukandrepublicofirelandtraumaandorthopaedicspecialisttraininganationalsurvey
AT fisherjoanned currentprovisionofsimulationintheukandrepublicofirelandtraumaandorthopaedicspecialisttraininganationalsurvey
AT griffindamianr currentprovisionofsimulationintheukandrepublicofirelandtraumaandorthopaedicspecialisttraininganationalsurvey