Cargando…

Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated substantial differences in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women. We sought to determine if disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between cycles from black non-Hispanic and w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seifer, D. B., Simsek, B., Wantman, E., Kotlyar, A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00662-4
_version_ 1783612058491682816
author Seifer, D. B.
Simsek, B.
Wantman, E.
Kotlyar, A. M.
author_facet Seifer, D. B.
Simsek, B.
Wantman, E.
Kotlyar, A. M.
author_sort Seifer, D. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated substantial differences in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women. We sought to determine if disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between cycles from black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women have changed and to identify factors that may have influenced change and determine racial differences in cumulative live birth rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the SARTCORS database outcomes for 2014–2016 compared with those previously reported in 2004–2006 and 1999/2000. Patient demographics, etiology of infertility, and cycle outcomes were compared between black non-hispanic and white non-hispanic patients. Categorical values were compared using Chi-squared testing. Continuous variables were compared using t-test. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess confounders. RESULTS: We analyzed 122,721 autologous, fresh, non-donor embryo cycles from 2014 to 2016 of which 13,717 cycles from black and 109,004 cycles from white women. The proportion of cycles from black women increased from 6.5 to 8.4%. Cycles from black women were almost 3 times more likely to have tubal and/or uterine factor and body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that black women had a lower live birth rate (OR 0.71;P < 0.001) and a lower cumulative live birth rate for their initial cycle (OR 0.64; P < 0.001) independent of age, parity, body mass index, etiology of infertility, ovarian reserve, cycle cancellation, past spontaneous abortions, use of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection or number of embryos transferred. A lower proportion of cycles in black women were represented among non-mandated states (P < 0.001) and cycles in black women were associated with higher clinical live birth rates in mandated states (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the US have persisted for black women over the last 15 years. Limited access to state mandated insurance may be contributory. Race has continued to be an independent prognostic factor for live birth and cumulative live birth rate from assisted reproductive technology in the US.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7677830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76778302020-11-20 Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US Seifer, D. B. Simsek, B. Wantman, E. Kotlyar, A. M. Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have demonstrated substantial differences in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women. We sought to determine if disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between cycles from black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women have changed and to identify factors that may have influenced change and determine racial differences in cumulative live birth rates. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of the SARTCORS database outcomes for 2014–2016 compared with those previously reported in 2004–2006 and 1999/2000. Patient demographics, etiology of infertility, and cycle outcomes were compared between black non-hispanic and white non-hispanic patients. Categorical values were compared using Chi-squared testing. Continuous variables were compared using t-test. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess confounders. RESULTS: We analyzed 122,721 autologous, fresh, non-donor embryo cycles from 2014 to 2016 of which 13,717 cycles from black and 109,004 cycles from white women. The proportion of cycles from black women increased from 6.5 to 8.4%. Cycles from black women were almost 3 times more likely to have tubal and/or uterine factor and body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that black women had a lower live birth rate (OR 0.71;P < 0.001) and a lower cumulative live birth rate for their initial cycle (OR 0.64; P < 0.001) independent of age, parity, body mass index, etiology of infertility, ovarian reserve, cycle cancellation, past spontaneous abortions, use of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection or number of embryos transferred. A lower proportion of cycles in black women were represented among non-mandated states (P < 0.001) and cycles in black women were associated with higher clinical live birth rates in mandated states (P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the US have persisted for black women over the last 15 years. Limited access to state mandated insurance may be contributory. Race has continued to be an independent prognostic factor for live birth and cumulative live birth rate from assisted reproductive technology in the US. BioMed Central 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7677830/ /pubmed/33213467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00662-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Seifer, D. B.
Simsek, B.
Wantman, E.
Kotlyar, A. M.
Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US
title Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US
title_full Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US
title_fullStr Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US
title_full_unstemmed Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US
title_short Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US
title_sort status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the us
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00662-4
work_keys_str_mv AT seiferdb statusofracialdisparitiesbetweenblackandwhitewomenundergoingassistedreproductivetechnologyintheus
AT simsekb statusofracialdisparitiesbetweenblackandwhitewomenundergoingassistedreproductivetechnologyintheus
AT wantmane statusofracialdisparitiesbetweenblackandwhitewomenundergoingassistedreproductivetechnologyintheus
AT kotlyaram statusofracialdisparitiesbetweenblackandwhitewomenundergoingassistedreproductivetechnologyintheus