Cargando…
Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) in Norway increasingly use spirometry diagnostically as well as in follow up of patients with respiratory complaints, but little is known about their skills and knowledge in this area. The aim of the present study was to investigate how GPs interpret a case hi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01310-x |
_version_ | 1783612061769531392 |
---|---|
author | Tollånes, Mette C. Sjaastad, Geir E. Aarli, Bernt B. Sandberg, Sverre |
author_facet | Tollånes, Mette C. Sjaastad, Geir E. Aarli, Bernt B. Sandberg, Sverre |
author_sort | Tollånes, Mette C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) in Norway increasingly use spirometry diagnostically as well as in follow up of patients with respiratory complaints, but little is known about their skills and knowledge in this area. The aim of the present study was to investigate how GPs interpret a case history and spirometry recordings of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and their knowledge about their own spirometer. METHODS: A web-based survey, consisting of a case history and spirometry recordings of a patient with COPD, was distributed to the 4700 members of the Norwegian GP Association. In addition to background information about themselves and their spirometer, topics included whether they requested, and how they interpreted, a spirometry reversibility-test, identification of the of most likely diagnosis, and recognition of the spirometry parameters used to diagnose COPD and grade airway obstruction. Immediate feedback was provided for educational purposes. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty GPs responded. Twenty six percent would not request a reversibility test, but 81% identified COPD as the most likely diagnosis. Less than 50% correctly identified the spirometry parameters used for diagnosis of COPD and grading the airway obstruction. One in five (21%) did not know which spirometer was used in their own practice, and 49 and 61% did not know which reference values were used for adults and children, respectively. Participants evaluated the survey as useful (average 74 points on a 0–100 scale) and would like more case-based surveys concerning use of spirometry in the future (average 91 points). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of self-selected GPs, probably more interested in respiratory medicine than the average GP, we identified several problem areas and gaps in knowledge regarding the use of spirometry. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01310-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7677845 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76778452020-11-20 Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice Tollånes, Mette C. Sjaastad, Geir E. Aarli, Bernt B. Sandberg, Sverre BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) in Norway increasingly use spirometry diagnostically as well as in follow up of patients with respiratory complaints, but little is known about their skills and knowledge in this area. The aim of the present study was to investigate how GPs interpret a case history and spirometry recordings of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and their knowledge about their own spirometer. METHODS: A web-based survey, consisting of a case history and spirometry recordings of a patient with COPD, was distributed to the 4700 members of the Norwegian GP Association. In addition to background information about themselves and their spirometer, topics included whether they requested, and how they interpreted, a spirometry reversibility-test, identification of the of most likely diagnosis, and recognition of the spirometry parameters used to diagnose COPD and grade airway obstruction. Immediate feedback was provided for educational purposes. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty GPs responded. Twenty six percent would not request a reversibility test, but 81% identified COPD as the most likely diagnosis. Less than 50% correctly identified the spirometry parameters used for diagnosis of COPD and grading the airway obstruction. One in five (21%) did not know which spirometer was used in their own practice, and 49 and 61% did not know which reference values were used for adults and children, respectively. Participants evaluated the survey as useful (average 74 points on a 0–100 scale) and would like more case-based surveys concerning use of spirometry in the future (average 91 points). CONCLUSION: In this cohort of self-selected GPs, probably more interested in respiratory medicine than the average GP, we identified several problem areas and gaps in knowledge regarding the use of spirometry. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12875-020-01310-x. BioMed Central 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7677845/ /pubmed/33208085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01310-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tollånes, Mette C. Sjaastad, Geir E. Aarli, Bernt B. Sandberg, Sverre Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice |
title | Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice |
title_full | Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice |
title_fullStr | Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice |
title_short | Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Norwegian general practice |
title_sort | spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in norwegian general practice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7677845/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33208085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01310-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tollanesmettec spirometryinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinnorwegiangeneralpractice AT sjaastadgeire spirometryinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinnorwegiangeneralpractice AT aarliberntb spirometryinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinnorwegiangeneralpractice AT sandbergsverre spirometryinchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseaseinnorwegiangeneralpractice |