Cargando…
Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01535-1 |
_version_ | 1783612081360076800 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Fei Wang, Fei Sun, Si Zhu, Mei Liu, Zheng |
author_facet | Chen, Fei Wang, Fei Sun, Si Zhu, Mei Liu, Zheng |
author_sort | Chen, Fei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). METHODS: Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. RESULTS: The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73 ± 2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98 ± 1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26 ± 2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. CONCLUSION: There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7678053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76780532020-11-20 Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound Chen, Fei Wang, Fei Sun, Si Zhu, Mei Liu, Zheng BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) imaging is known to underestimate tumor size in clinical. This study is aimed to compare the size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in three US imaging modalities, i.e. two-dimensional (2D) imaging, the arterial phase (AP) and the late phase (LP) imaging of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS). METHODS: Fifty-eight clinically proved HCC patients were included. The 2D and CEUS imaging were performed with Siemens S2000, Philips iu22 and BioSound Twice. 2.5 mL of SonoVue® was injected for every CEUS performance. Two physicians measured the maximal longitudinal and the transverse diameters of the tumors in 2D, the AP and the LP of CEUS from one image section. The three measurements were compared by paired t test. RESULTS: The mean longitudinal diameter of HCC appeared to be maximal in the AP (4.73 ± 2.04 cm) of CEUS and minimal in the LP (3.98 ± 1.99 cm) of CEUS. The 2D diameter (4.26 ± 2.07 cm) was in the middle between two CEUS measurements. There were significant differences between any two measurements. CONCLUSION: There is size difference between the three kinds of HCC measurement. It appeared to be maximal in the AP of CEUS and minimal in the LP. The 2D diameter was in the middle. BioMed Central 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7678053/ /pubmed/33213375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01535-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Fei Wang, Fei Sun, Si Zhu, Mei Liu, Zheng Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
title | Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
title_full | Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
title_fullStr | Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
title_full_unstemmed | Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
title_short | Size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
title_sort | size measurements of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparisons between contrast and two-dimensional ultrasound |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01535-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenfei sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound AT wangfei sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound AT sunsi sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound AT zhumei sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound AT liuzheng sizemeasurementsofhepatocellularcarcinomacomparisonsbetweencontrastandtwodimensionalultrasound |