Cargando…

Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms

BACKGROUND: The global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health problem impacted by antimicrobial use (AMU) for human and livestock applications. Extensive Iberian swine production is based on a more sustainable and eco-friendly management system, providing an excellent opportunity t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mencía-Ares, Oscar, Cabrera-Rubio, Raúl, Cobo-Díaz, José Francisco, Álvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino, Gómez-García, Manuel, Puente, Héctor, Cotter, Paul D., Crispie, Fiona, Carvajal, Ana, Rubio, Pedro, Argüello, Héctor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00941-7
_version_ 1783612083875610624
author Mencía-Ares, Oscar
Cabrera-Rubio, Raúl
Cobo-Díaz, José Francisco
Álvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
Gómez-García, Manuel
Puente, Héctor
Cotter, Paul D.
Crispie, Fiona
Carvajal, Ana
Rubio, Pedro
Argüello, Héctor
author_facet Mencía-Ares, Oscar
Cabrera-Rubio, Raúl
Cobo-Díaz, José Francisco
Álvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
Gómez-García, Manuel
Puente, Héctor
Cotter, Paul D.
Crispie, Fiona
Carvajal, Ana
Rubio, Pedro
Argüello, Héctor
author_sort Mencía-Ares, Oscar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health problem impacted by antimicrobial use (AMU) for human and livestock applications. Extensive Iberian swine production is based on a more sustainable and eco-friendly management system, providing an excellent opportunity to evaluate how sustained differences in AMU impact the resistome, not only in the animals but also on the farm environment. Here, we evaluate the resistome footprint of an extensive pig farming system, maintained for decades, as compared to that of industrialized intensive pig farming by analyzing 105 fecal, environmental and slurry metagenomes from 38 farms. RESULTS: Our results evidence a significantly higher abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) on intensive farms and a link between AMU and AMR to certain antimicrobial classes. We observed differences in the resistome across sample types, with a higher richness and dispersion of ARGs within environmental samples than on those from feces or slurry. Indeed, a deeper analysis revealed that differences among the three sample types were defined by taxa-ARGs associations. Interestingly, mobilome analyses revealed that the observed AMR differences between intensive and extensive farms could be linked to differences in the abundance of mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Thus, while there were no differences in the abundance of chromosomal-associated ARGs between intensive and extensive herds, a significantly higher abundance of integrons in the environment and plasmids, regardless of the sample type, was detected on intensive farms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study shows how AMU, production system, and sample type influence, mainly through MGEs, the profile and dispersion of ARGs in pig production. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-020-00941-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76780692020-11-20 Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms Mencía-Ares, Oscar Cabrera-Rubio, Raúl Cobo-Díaz, José Francisco Álvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino Gómez-García, Manuel Puente, Héctor Cotter, Paul D. Crispie, Fiona Carvajal, Ana Rubio, Pedro Argüello, Héctor Microbiome Research BACKGROUND: The global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a One Health problem impacted by antimicrobial use (AMU) for human and livestock applications. Extensive Iberian swine production is based on a more sustainable and eco-friendly management system, providing an excellent opportunity to evaluate how sustained differences in AMU impact the resistome, not only in the animals but also on the farm environment. Here, we evaluate the resistome footprint of an extensive pig farming system, maintained for decades, as compared to that of industrialized intensive pig farming by analyzing 105 fecal, environmental and slurry metagenomes from 38 farms. RESULTS: Our results evidence a significantly higher abundance of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) on intensive farms and a link between AMU and AMR to certain antimicrobial classes. We observed differences in the resistome across sample types, with a higher richness and dispersion of ARGs within environmental samples than on those from feces or slurry. Indeed, a deeper analysis revealed that differences among the three sample types were defined by taxa-ARGs associations. Interestingly, mobilome analyses revealed that the observed AMR differences between intensive and extensive farms could be linked to differences in the abundance of mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Thus, while there were no differences in the abundance of chromosomal-associated ARGs between intensive and extensive herds, a significantly higher abundance of integrons in the environment and plasmids, regardless of the sample type, was detected on intensive farms. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study shows how AMU, production system, and sample type influence, mainly through MGEs, the profile and dispersion of ARGs in pig production. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40168-020-00941-7. BioMed Central 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7678069/ /pubmed/33213522 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00941-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mencía-Ares, Oscar
Cabrera-Rubio, Raúl
Cobo-Díaz, José Francisco
Álvarez-Ordóñez, Avelino
Gómez-García, Manuel
Puente, Héctor
Cotter, Paul D.
Crispie, Fiona
Carvajal, Ana
Rubio, Pedro
Argüello, Héctor
Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
title Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
title_full Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
title_fullStr Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
title_short Antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
title_sort antimicrobial use and production system shape the fecal, environmental, and slurry resistomes of pig farms
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213522
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00941-7
work_keys_str_mv AT menciaaresoscar antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT cabrerarubioraul antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT cobodiazjosefrancisco antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT alvarezordonezavelino antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT gomezgarciamanuel antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT puentehector antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT cotterpauld antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT crispiefiona antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT carvajalana antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT rubiopedro antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms
AT arguellohector antimicrobialuseandproductionsystemshapethefecalenvironmentalandslurryresistomesofpigfarms