Cargando…

Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase

BACKGROUND: In the absence of extant recommendations, the aim of this study was to formalise support practices used by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit (PCU) for the relatives of patients in the agonal phase preceding death. The secondary objective was to understand the expectatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mélin, M., Amieva, H., Frasca, M., Ouvrard, C., Berger, V., Hoarau, H., Roumiguière, C., Paternostre, B., Stadelmaier, N., Raoux, N., Bergua, V., Burucoa, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00680-4
_version_ 1783612088219860992
author Mélin, M.
Amieva, H.
Frasca, M.
Ouvrard, C.
Berger, V.
Hoarau, H.
Roumiguière, C.
Paternostre, B.
Stadelmaier, N.
Raoux, N.
Bergua, V.
Burucoa, B.
author_facet Mélin, M.
Amieva, H.
Frasca, M.
Ouvrard, C.
Berger, V.
Hoarau, H.
Roumiguière, C.
Paternostre, B.
Stadelmaier, N.
Raoux, N.
Bergua, V.
Burucoa, B.
author_sort Mélin, M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the absence of extant recommendations, the aim of this study was to formalise support practices used by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit (PCU) for the relatives of patients in the agonal phase preceding death. The secondary objective was to understand the expectations of relatives during this phase in terms of the support provided by professionals and volunteers. METHODS: Thirty-two people took part in this study; all were interviewed through focus groups (FGs). Each FG comprised one category of individuals working in the PCU: nurses, care- assistants, doctors, psychologists, other professionals, palliative-care volunteers, and relatives. Groups were surveyed using an interview guide, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed to enable identification and characterization of all practices. Care practices were classified into four categories: current consensual practices (i.e. performed by all team members), occasional consensual practices, non-consensual practices (performed by one or a few participants), and practices to be developed. RESULTS: In total, 215 practices were mentioned by professionals and palliative-care volunteers: 150 current consensual practices, 48 occasional consensual practices, 1 non-consensual practice, 16 practices yet to be developed, and 29 practices for relatives. Many practices were mentioned by different categories of participants; thus, after cross-checking, the number of practices decreased from 215 to 52. A list of practices deemed desirable by all was drawn up and then validated by the entire interprofessional team. These practices were organised around four themes: providing care and ensuring comfort; communicating, informing, and explaining; interacting; and mobilising interdisciplinary skills. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the importance of the quality of care provided to patients, the attention given to the relatives themselves, and they highlight the importance of the helping relationship. Following this study, which established a list of varied practices aimed at supporting the relatives of patients in agonal phase, it will be important to set up a broader study seeking to establish a consensus on these practices with an interprofessional group of experts from other PCUs using broad surveys and an adapted methodology. Such studies will make it possible to develop training modules for teams working with relatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-020-00680-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678093
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76780932020-11-20 Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase Mélin, M. Amieva, H. Frasca, M. Ouvrard, C. Berger, V. Hoarau, H. Roumiguière, C. Paternostre, B. Stadelmaier, N. Raoux, N. Bergua, V. Burucoa, B. BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: In the absence of extant recommendations, the aim of this study was to formalise support practices used by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit (PCU) for the relatives of patients in the agonal phase preceding death. The secondary objective was to understand the expectations of relatives during this phase in terms of the support provided by professionals and volunteers. METHODS: Thirty-two people took part in this study; all were interviewed through focus groups (FGs). Each FG comprised one category of individuals working in the PCU: nurses, care- assistants, doctors, psychologists, other professionals, palliative-care volunteers, and relatives. Groups were surveyed using an interview guide, and the interviews were recorded and transcribed to enable identification and characterization of all practices. Care practices were classified into four categories: current consensual practices (i.e. performed by all team members), occasional consensual practices, non-consensual practices (performed by one or a few participants), and practices to be developed. RESULTS: In total, 215 practices were mentioned by professionals and palliative-care volunteers: 150 current consensual practices, 48 occasional consensual practices, 1 non-consensual practice, 16 practices yet to be developed, and 29 practices for relatives. Many practices were mentioned by different categories of participants; thus, after cross-checking, the number of practices decreased from 215 to 52. A list of practices deemed desirable by all was drawn up and then validated by the entire interprofessional team. These practices were organised around four themes: providing care and ensuring comfort; communicating, informing, and explaining; interacting; and mobilising interdisciplinary skills. CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the importance of the quality of care provided to patients, the attention given to the relatives themselves, and they highlight the importance of the helping relationship. Following this study, which established a list of varied practices aimed at supporting the relatives of patients in agonal phase, it will be important to set up a broader study seeking to establish a consensus on these practices with an interprofessional group of experts from other PCUs using broad surveys and an adapted methodology. Such studies will make it possible to develop training modules for teams working with relatives. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-020-00680-4. BioMed Central 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7678093/ /pubmed/33213448 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00680-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mélin, M.
Amieva, H.
Frasca, M.
Ouvrard, C.
Berger, V.
Hoarau, H.
Roumiguière, C.
Paternostre, B.
Stadelmaier, N.
Raoux, N.
Bergua, V.
Burucoa, B.
Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
title Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
title_full Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
title_fullStr Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
title_full_unstemmed Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
title_short Support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
title_sort support practices by an interdisciplinary team in a palliative-care unit for relatives of patients in agonal phase
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678093/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33213448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00680-4
work_keys_str_mv AT melinm supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT amievah supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT frascam supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT ouvrardc supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT bergerv supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT hoarauh supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT roumiguierec supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT paternostreb supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT stadelmaiern supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT raouxn supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT berguav supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase
AT burucoab supportpracticesbyaninterdisciplinaryteaminapalliativecareunitforrelativesofpatientsinagonalphase