Cargando…
Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study
BACKGROUND: The James Lind Alliance (JLA) offers a method for research priority setting with patients, clinicians and carers. The method is increasingly used but publications primarily discuss the outcome of such projects, rather than reflecting on the JLA method itself. Scrutiny of the method is cr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00240-3 |
_version_ | 1783612120395415552 |
---|---|
author | Jongsma, Karin van Seventer, Juliette Verwoerd, Anouk van Rensen, Annemiek |
author_facet | Jongsma, Karin van Seventer, Juliette Verwoerd, Anouk van Rensen, Annemiek |
author_sort | Jongsma, Karin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The James Lind Alliance (JLA) offers a method for research priority setting with patients, clinicians and carers. The method is increasingly used but publications primarily discuss the outcome of such projects, rather than reflecting on the JLA method itself. Scrutiny of the method is crucial in order to understand and correctly interpret its outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative interview study with people involved in a JLA project into Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) (n = 30) to better understand the mechanisms, procedures and decisional processes during such a project and to formulate recommendations for those who consider starting a JLA project in the future. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified: 1) motivations, goals and expectations 2) inclusivity, roles and representation 3) procedures and decision-making 4) outcomes and future steps. CONCLUSION: While the top 10 of ‘evidence uncertainties’ seems to take the centre stage in JLA projects, the ways in which these priorities are determined may be influenced by ‘process uncertainties’. We have formulated ten specific recommendations for future JLA projects. Reflection on and reporting of these process uncertainties would contribute to the improvement of JLA projects and increase the validity of the outcome of such projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7678261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-76782612020-11-20 Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study Jongsma, Karin van Seventer, Juliette Verwoerd, Anouk van Rensen, Annemiek Res Involv Engagem Research Article BACKGROUND: The James Lind Alliance (JLA) offers a method for research priority setting with patients, clinicians and carers. The method is increasingly used but publications primarily discuss the outcome of such projects, rather than reflecting on the JLA method itself. Scrutiny of the method is crucial in order to understand and correctly interpret its outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative interview study with people involved in a JLA project into Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) (n = 30) to better understand the mechanisms, procedures and decisional processes during such a project and to formulate recommendations for those who consider starting a JLA project in the future. RESULTS: Four main themes were identified: 1) motivations, goals and expectations 2) inclusivity, roles and representation 3) procedures and decision-making 4) outcomes and future steps. CONCLUSION: While the top 10 of ‘evidence uncertainties’ seems to take the centre stage in JLA projects, the ways in which these priorities are determined may be influenced by ‘process uncertainties’. We have formulated ten specific recommendations for future JLA projects. Reflection on and reporting of these process uncertainties would contribute to the improvement of JLA projects and increase the validity of the outcome of such projects. BioMed Central 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7678261/ /pubmed/33292829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00240-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jongsma, Karin van Seventer, Juliette Verwoerd, Anouk van Rensen, Annemiek Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
title | Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
title_full | Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
title_short | Recommendations from a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
title_sort | recommendations from a james lind alliance priority setting partnership - a qualitative interview study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33292829 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00240-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jongsmakarin recommendationsfromajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnershipaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT vanseventerjuliette recommendationsfromajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnershipaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT verwoerdanouk recommendationsfromajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnershipaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT vanrensenannemiek recommendationsfromajameslindallianceprioritysettingpartnershipaqualitativeinterviewstudy |