Cargando…

Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy has partially replaced open surgery due to the lower infection rate for the patient and hence better and shorter recovery. However, the surgeon’s physical load is higher due to longer duration static and awkward body postures, increasing the risk for developing work-related...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luger, Tessy, Rieger, Monika A, Bonsch, Rosina, Krämer, Bernhard, Seibt, Robert, Steinhilber, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038952
_version_ 1783612144860790784
author Luger, Tessy
Rieger, Monika A
Bonsch, Rosina
Krämer, Bernhard
Seibt, Robert
Steinhilber, Benjamin
author_facet Luger, Tessy
Rieger, Monika A
Bonsch, Rosina
Krämer, Bernhard
Seibt, Robert
Steinhilber, Benjamin
author_sort Luger, Tessy
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy has partially replaced open surgery due to the lower infection rate for the patient and hence better and shorter recovery. However, the surgeon’s physical load is higher due to longer duration static and awkward body postures, increasing the risk for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Interventions of an organisational nature are work breaks, being either passive or active. The primary objectives of this study are to determine whether passive and active work breaks lead to less discomfort than no work breaks and whether active work breaks lead to less discomfort than passive work breaks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A controlled, randomised cross-over trial will be performed in the laboratory, of which its protocol is described here according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement. Recruitment of 21 laparoscopic surgeons started in April 2019 and the study is ongoing. The participating surgeons will perform three 1.5 hour experimental conditions, one without work breaks, one with 2.5 min passive work breaks including rest, and one with 2.5 min active work breaks including mobility and stretching exercises. The work breaks will be taken after 30 and 60 min of work. During the experiments, outcomes will be recorded. The primary outcome is rating of perceived discomfort measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The secondary outcomes are performance, muscle activity of selected muscles, upper body angles, heart rate, workload and subjective evaluation of both interventions. The collected data will be tested using a one-way or two-factorial repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of the study protocol was received by the local medical ethical committee of the University of Tübingen in February 2019 (no 618/2018BO2). The results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences, submitted for publications in peer-reviewed journals and serve as the starting point for a feasibility study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03715816.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76783872020-11-30 Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial Luger, Tessy Rieger, Monika A Bonsch, Rosina Krämer, Bernhard Seibt, Robert Steinhilber, Benjamin BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy has partially replaced open surgery due to the lower infection rate for the patient and hence better and shorter recovery. However, the surgeon’s physical load is higher due to longer duration static and awkward body postures, increasing the risk for developing work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Interventions of an organisational nature are work breaks, being either passive or active. The primary objectives of this study are to determine whether passive and active work breaks lead to less discomfort than no work breaks and whether active work breaks lead to less discomfort than passive work breaks. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A controlled, randomised cross-over trial will be performed in the laboratory, of which its protocol is described here according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement. Recruitment of 21 laparoscopic surgeons started in April 2019 and the study is ongoing. The participating surgeons will perform three 1.5 hour experimental conditions, one without work breaks, one with 2.5 min passive work breaks including rest, and one with 2.5 min active work breaks including mobility and stretching exercises. The work breaks will be taken after 30 and 60 min of work. During the experiments, outcomes will be recorded. The primary outcome is rating of perceived discomfort measured on an 11-point numeric rating scale. The secondary outcomes are performance, muscle activity of selected muscles, upper body angles, heart rate, workload and subjective evaluation of both interventions. The collected data will be tested using a one-way or two-factorial repeated-measures analysis of variance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval of the study protocol was received by the local medical ethical committee of the University of Tübingen in February 2019 (no 618/2018BO2). The results of this study will be presented at national and international conferences, submitted for publications in peer-reviewed journals and serve as the starting point for a feasibility study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03715816. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7678387/ /pubmed/33444192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038952 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Luger, Tessy
Rieger, Monika A
Bonsch, Rosina
Krämer, Bernhard
Seibt, Robert
Steinhilber, Benjamin
Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
title Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
title_full Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
title_fullStr Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
title_full_unstemmed Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
title_short Active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
title_sort active and passive work breaks during simulated laparoscopy among laparoscopic surgeons: study protocol for a controlled, randomised cross-over laboratory trial
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33444192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038952
work_keys_str_mv AT lugertessy activeandpassiveworkbreaksduringsimulatedlaparoscopyamonglaparoscopicsurgeonsstudyprotocolforacontrolledrandomisedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT riegermonikaa activeandpassiveworkbreaksduringsimulatedlaparoscopyamonglaparoscopicsurgeonsstudyprotocolforacontrolledrandomisedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT bonschrosina activeandpassiveworkbreaksduringsimulatedlaparoscopyamonglaparoscopicsurgeonsstudyprotocolforacontrolledrandomisedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT kramerbernhard activeandpassiveworkbreaksduringsimulatedlaparoscopyamonglaparoscopicsurgeonsstudyprotocolforacontrolledrandomisedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT seibtrobert activeandpassiveworkbreaksduringsimulatedlaparoscopyamonglaparoscopicsurgeonsstudyprotocolforacontrolledrandomisedcrossoverlaboratorytrial
AT steinhilberbenjamin activeandpassiveworkbreaksduringsimulatedlaparoscopyamonglaparoscopicsurgeonsstudyprotocolforacontrolledrandomisedcrossoverlaboratorytrial