Cargando…

Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study

PURPOSE: Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) programs for chronic back pain are effective and recommended. The patient-centered and biopsychosocial nature of IMPT is grounded in contemporary understanding that chronic pain states reflect heightened sensitization of the nervous system ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richter, Michael, Rauscher, Christian, Kluttig, Alexander, Mallwitz, Joachim, Delank, Karl-Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235493
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S272943
_version_ 1783612162631008256
author Richter, Michael
Rauscher, Christian
Kluttig, Alexander
Mallwitz, Joachim
Delank, Karl-Stefan
author_facet Richter, Michael
Rauscher, Christian
Kluttig, Alexander
Mallwitz, Joachim
Delank, Karl-Stefan
author_sort Richter, Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) programs for chronic back pain are effective and recommended. The patient-centered and biopsychosocial nature of IMPT is grounded in contemporary understanding that chronic pain states reflect heightened sensitization of the nervous system rather than an issue in the tissue. Teaching patients about pain is part of IMPT programs, though a clinical guideline is lacking. This study aims to answer the following question: Does the addition of an evidence-based pain neuroscience education (PNE) lecture for patients, into an IMPT program, produce superior results than the IMPT program itself? PATIENTS AND METHODS: A non-randomized, controlled intervention study was performed with 179 back pain patients indicated for IMPT. Intervention group (N=102) received a four-week IMPT program, which contained 4 one-hour sessions PNE. Control group (N=77) received the same IMPT without the additional PNE. Primary outcome was current pain after intervention. Pain knowledge, physical function, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life and fear-avoidance were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were defined as change of the parameter measured before and immediately after the four-week IMPT. For each outcome, linear regression models were used to estimate the raw and adjusted (sex, age and BMI) effect of additional PNE. RESULTS: Despite improvement in all outcomes for both groups during the treatment phase, the implemented PNE did not result in additional pain reduction (regression coefficient for PNE effect on pain level 0.34; 95% CI −6.23–6.97). Between-group differences could only be shown for pain-related knowledge in favor for the intervention group (0.78; 95% CI 0.35–1.20). CONCLUSION: The additional PNE lecture did not lead to pain reduction beyond the usual IMPT. However, the PNE did increase pain-related knowledge and, therefore, might be helpful in coping with pain after the IMPT program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76784722020-11-23 Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study Richter, Michael Rauscher, Christian Kluttig, Alexander Mallwitz, Joachim Delank, Karl-Stefan J Pain Res Original Research PURPOSE: Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) programs for chronic back pain are effective and recommended. The patient-centered and biopsychosocial nature of IMPT is grounded in contemporary understanding that chronic pain states reflect heightened sensitization of the nervous system rather than an issue in the tissue. Teaching patients about pain is part of IMPT programs, though a clinical guideline is lacking. This study aims to answer the following question: Does the addition of an evidence-based pain neuroscience education (PNE) lecture for patients, into an IMPT program, produce superior results than the IMPT program itself? PATIENTS AND METHODS: A non-randomized, controlled intervention study was performed with 179 back pain patients indicated for IMPT. Intervention group (N=102) received a four-week IMPT program, which contained 4 one-hour sessions PNE. Control group (N=77) received the same IMPT without the additional PNE. Primary outcome was current pain after intervention. Pain knowledge, physical function, depression, anxiety, stress, quality of life and fear-avoidance were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were defined as change of the parameter measured before and immediately after the four-week IMPT. For each outcome, linear regression models were used to estimate the raw and adjusted (sex, age and BMI) effect of additional PNE. RESULTS: Despite improvement in all outcomes for both groups during the treatment phase, the implemented PNE did not result in additional pain reduction (regression coefficient for PNE effect on pain level 0.34; 95% CI −6.23–6.97). Between-group differences could only be shown for pain-related knowledge in favor for the intervention group (0.78; 95% CI 0.35–1.20). CONCLUSION: The additional PNE lecture did not lead to pain reduction beyond the usual IMPT. However, the PNE did increase pain-related knowledge and, therefore, might be helpful in coping with pain after the IMPT program. Dove 2020-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7678472/ /pubmed/33235493 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S272943 Text en © 2020 Richter et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Richter, Michael
Rauscher, Christian
Kluttig, Alexander
Mallwitz, Joachim
Delank, Karl-Stefan
Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
title Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
title_full Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
title_fullStr Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
title_short Effect of Additional Pain Neuroscience Education in Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Therapy on Current Pain. A Non-Randomized, Controlled Intervention Study
title_sort effect of additional pain neuroscience education in interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy on current pain. a non-randomized, controlled intervention study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235493
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S272943
work_keys_str_mv AT richtermichael effectofadditionalpainneuroscienceeducationininterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapyoncurrentpainanonrandomizedcontrolledinterventionstudy
AT rauscherchristian effectofadditionalpainneuroscienceeducationininterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapyoncurrentpainanonrandomizedcontrolledinterventionstudy
AT kluttigalexander effectofadditionalpainneuroscienceeducationininterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapyoncurrentpainanonrandomizedcontrolledinterventionstudy
AT mallwitzjoachim effectofadditionalpainneuroscienceeducationininterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapyoncurrentpainanonrandomizedcontrolledinterventionstudy
AT delankkarlstefan effectofadditionalpainneuroscienceeducationininterdisciplinarymultimodalpaintherapyoncurrentpainanonrandomizedcontrolledinterventionstudy