Cargando…

Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure

BACKGROUND: Associations of coffee consumption with multiple health outcomes have been researched extensively. Coffee consumption, usually reported in cups a day, is a heterogeneous measure due to numerous preparation methods and cup sizes, leading to misclassification. This paper develops a new ‘un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poole, Robin, Ewings, Sean, Parkes, Julie, Fallowfield, Jonathan A, Roderick, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2018-000013
_version_ 1783612165046927360
author Poole, Robin
Ewings, Sean
Parkes, Julie
Fallowfield, Jonathan A
Roderick, Paul
author_facet Poole, Robin
Ewings, Sean
Parkes, Julie
Fallowfield, Jonathan A
Roderick, Paul
author_sort Poole, Robin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Associations of coffee consumption with multiple health outcomes have been researched extensively. Coffee consumption, usually reported in cups a day, is a heterogeneous measure due to numerous preparation methods and cup sizes, leading to misclassification. This paper develops a new ‘unit’ measure of coffee and uses coffee consumption data from a representative sample of the UK population to assess misclassification when cup volume and preparation type are not taken into account. METHODS: A coffee unit measure was created using published estimates of caffeine and chlorogenic acid concentrations, and applied across volumes and preparation types. Four-day food diary data in adults from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS; 2012–2016) were used to quantify coffee intake. Participant self-reported cups a day were compared with cups a day standardised by (a) 227 mL volume and (b) 227 mL instant coffee equivalents (unit measure), and the degree of misclassification was derived. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to model coffee drinking preferences of different populations and caffeine:chlorogenic acid weighting assumptions of the unit measure. RESULTS: The NDNS sample consisted of 2832 adult participants. Coffee was consumed by 62% of participants. Types varied, with 75% of caffeinated coffee cups being instant, 17% filter, 3% latte, 2% cappuccino, 2% espresso and <1% other types. Comparing reported cups to volume-standardised cups, 84% of participants had correct classification, and 73% when using the coffee unit measure, 22% underestimated and 5% overestimated, largely by one cup. Misclassification varied by gender, age and income. Sensitivity analysis highlighted the benefits of using the unit measure over volume alone to cater for different populations, and stability of the unit composition assumption. CONCLUSION: Cup volume and preparation type should be taken into account, through the application of a standardised coffee unit measure, when coffee consumption is classified in future research studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7678482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-76784822020-11-23 Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure Poole, Robin Ewings, Sean Parkes, Julie Fallowfield, Jonathan A Roderick, Paul BMJ Nutr Prev Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Associations of coffee consumption with multiple health outcomes have been researched extensively. Coffee consumption, usually reported in cups a day, is a heterogeneous measure due to numerous preparation methods and cup sizes, leading to misclassification. This paper develops a new ‘unit’ measure of coffee and uses coffee consumption data from a representative sample of the UK population to assess misclassification when cup volume and preparation type are not taken into account. METHODS: A coffee unit measure was created using published estimates of caffeine and chlorogenic acid concentrations, and applied across volumes and preparation types. Four-day food diary data in adults from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS; 2012–2016) were used to quantify coffee intake. Participant self-reported cups a day were compared with cups a day standardised by (a) 227 mL volume and (b) 227 mL instant coffee equivalents (unit measure), and the degree of misclassification was derived. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to model coffee drinking preferences of different populations and caffeine:chlorogenic acid weighting assumptions of the unit measure. RESULTS: The NDNS sample consisted of 2832 adult participants. Coffee was consumed by 62% of participants. Types varied, with 75% of caffeinated coffee cups being instant, 17% filter, 3% latte, 2% cappuccino, 2% espresso and <1% other types. Comparing reported cups to volume-standardised cups, 84% of participants had correct classification, and 73% when using the coffee unit measure, 22% underestimated and 5% overestimated, largely by one cup. Misclassification varied by gender, age and income. Sensitivity analysis highlighted the benefits of using the unit measure over volume alone to cater for different populations, and stability of the unit composition assumption. CONCLUSION: Cup volume and preparation type should be taken into account, through the application of a standardised coffee unit measure, when coffee consumption is classified in future research studies. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7678482/ /pubmed/33235952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2018-000013 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Original Research
Poole, Robin
Ewings, Sean
Parkes, Julie
Fallowfield, Jonathan A
Roderick, Paul
Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
title Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
title_full Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
title_fullStr Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
title_full_unstemmed Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
title_short Misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
title_sort misclassification of coffee consumption data and the development of a standardised coffee unit measure
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33235952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2018-000013
work_keys_str_mv AT poolerobin misclassificationofcoffeeconsumptiondataandthedevelopmentofastandardisedcoffeeunitmeasure
AT ewingssean misclassificationofcoffeeconsumptiondataandthedevelopmentofastandardisedcoffeeunitmeasure
AT parkesjulie misclassificationofcoffeeconsumptiondataandthedevelopmentofastandardisedcoffeeunitmeasure
AT fallowfieldjonathana misclassificationofcoffeeconsumptiondataandthedevelopmentofastandardisedcoffeeunitmeasure
AT roderickpaul misclassificationofcoffeeconsumptiondataandthedevelopmentofastandardisedcoffeeunitmeasure